Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Analysis of the Notion of Role
The Dimensions of Our Analysis
Discussion
, Conclusion
References
All Topics
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence

The notion of role in conceptual modelling

Profile image of Nathalie Aussenac-GillesNathalie Aussenac-Gilles

1997, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFB0026788
visibility

…

description

17 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

In this article we analyse the notion of knowledge role. First of all, we present how the relationship between problem solving methods and domain models is tackled in different approaches. We concentrate on how they cope with this issue in the knowledge engineering process. Secondly, we introduce several properties which can be used to analyse, characterise and define the notion of role. We evaluate and compare the works exposed previously following these dimensions. This analysis suggests some developments to better exploit the relationship between reasoning and domain knowledge. We present them in a last section.

Related papers

Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Modelling
Marie-laure Mugnier, Dickson Lukose

Proceedings of the …, 1995

View PDFchevron_right
Assumptions of problem-solving methods and their role in knowledge engineering
Dieter Fensel

ECAI, 1996

A problem-solving method describes a reasoning process that efficiently achieves a goal by applying domain knowledge. However, a problem-solving method cannot directly be applied because of the existence of a gap between, on the one hand, a problem-solving method and the domain knowledge it uses, and, on the other hand, a problem-solving method and the goal that it is supposed to achieve. In this paper, we distinguish two types of assumptions based on an architecture of problem-solving methods, that are able to bridge the gap: one type of assumption is used to strengthen a problem-solving method, and the other to weaken the goal to be achieved. We also show how the effect of one assumption type can be substituted by the effect of the other type, and refer to this as "the law of conservation of assumptions".

View PDFchevron_right
Definition of a problem-sensitive conceptual modelling language: foundations and application to software engineering
Andrés Silva

Information and Software Technology, 2006

A conceptual modelling language should provide constructors that can be used to represent the conceptualisation of a problem considering the problem domain. However, software engineering has traditionally focused on implementation concepts. This paper considers the appropriate generic conceptualisation theoretical aspects to identify the conceptual elements for which constructors have to be provided in a problem-sensitive conceptual modelling language. These elements match the formal definition of any conceptualisation and are derived from natural language. By looking at these elements, we have defined a conceptual modelling language that has been successfully applied in knowledge engineering and software engineering.

View PDFchevron_right
The Utilisation of Semantic Information to Bring Conceptual Modelling Closer to Application Domain Experts
Artur Serrano

1995

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptual Modelling In Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Concepts, Techniques and Trends
Juan Carlos

Handbook of Software …, 2001

Conceptual modelling is a crucial software development activity for both Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Each discipline, however, has developed its own techniques for conceptual modelling, and there is no agreement about a common set of techniques that can be used in both disciplines. This chapter will describe such techniques, paying special attention to the more recent and innovative ones, as well as to the concepts shared by the techniques used in the two disciplines. The chapter will, therefore, outline the field of conceptual modelling within these two disciplines. Although the situation in the field is satisfactory, as can be inferred from the review conducted, there is still a lot of work to be done. Indeed, a series of shortcomings besetting the different techniques will be identified and an alternative perspective will be described, which points to a way of quieting such objections.

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptual modeling in software engineering and knowledge engineering: Concepts, techniques and trends, Handbook of Software Engineering& …
Almudena Sierra

2001

Conceptual modelling is a crucial software development activity for both Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Each discipline, however, has developed its own techniques for conceptual modelling, and there is no agreement about a common set of techniques that can be used in both disciplines. This chapter will describe such techniques, paying special attention to the more recent and innovative ones, as well as to the concepts shared by the techniques used in the two disciplines. The chapter will, therefore, outline the field of conceptual modelling within these two disciplines. Although the situation in the field is satisfactory, as can be inferred from the review conducted, there is still a lot of work to be done. Indeed, a series of shortcomings besetting the different techniques will be identified and an alternative perspective will be described, which points to a way of quieting such objections.

View PDFchevron_right
The Effect of Domain Familiarity on Modelling Roles: an Empirical Study
Palash Bera

2009

Conceptual modelling (CM) involves analysts working with domain experts to create a representation of a domain called a conceptual model. We address two issues in CM research. The first deals with the semantics that conceptual models convey. We propose guidelines for how analysts can reflect the semantics of a "role" in a conceptual model using the extended entity relationship (EER) method. Roles are important in organizations, but analysts have little guidance about how to model them. The second issue is the extent to which readers' prior familiarity with the domain shown in a model affects their understanding of the model. We conducted a laboratory study to determine how domain familiarity affects users' understanding of conceptual models that represent roles. Our results indicate that conceptual models developed in accordance with our guidelines show roles more clearly but that the benefit of doing so depends on model readers' familiarity with the modeled domain. In particular, our guidelines will be most useful when users have moderate knowledge of the domain shown in the model. When users are very familiar with the domain, the guidelines do not seem to have much benefit. However, when users have very little knowledge of the domain, the guidelines do help to a certain extent.

View PDFchevron_right
Towards a Theory of Conceptual Modelling
Bernhard Thalheim

Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2010

Conceptual modelling is a widely applied practice and has led to a large body of knowledge on constructs that might be used for modelling and on methods that might be useful for modelling. It is commonly accepted that database application development is based on conceptual modelling. It is however surprising that only very few publications have been published on a theory of conceptual modelling. Modelling is typically supported by languages that are well-founded and easy to apply for the description of the application domain, the requirements and the system solution. It is thus based on a theory of modelling constructs. At the same time, modelling incorporates a description of the application domain and a prescription of requirements for supporting systems. It is thus based on methods of application domain gathering. Modelling is also an engineering activity with engineering steps and engineering results. It is thus engineering. The first facet of modelling has led to a huge body of knowledge. The second facet is considered from time to time in the scientific literature. The third facet is underexposed in the scientific literature. This paper aims in developing principles of conceptual modelling. They cover modelling constructs as well as modelling activities as well as modelling properties and as well as management of models. We first clarify the notion of conceptual modelling. Principles of modelling may be applied and accepted or not by the modeler. Based on these principles we can derive a theory of conceptual modelling that combines foundations of modelling constructs, application capture and engineering. A general theory of conceptual modelling is far too comprehensive and far too complex. It is not yet visible how such a theory can be developed. This paper therefore aims in introducing a framework and an approach to a general theory of conceptual modelling. We are however in urgent need of such a theory. We are sure that this theory can be developed and use this paper for the introduction of the main ingredients of this theory.

View PDFchevron_right
Foundations of a Structured Approach to Characterising Domain Knowledge
H NWANA

2007

One of the key phases in Knowledge Based Systems (KBS) construction is Knowledge Acquisition. However, human knowledge about domains is so complex that without an analysis stage that probes the underlying nature of the real world problem and how human experts conceptualise it, the knowledge incorporated within a KBS remains shallow and incomplete. In this paper, we highlight foundational details of a structured approach to knowledge analysis and describe its application to domains associated with software installation and neural networks. 1 Introduction: Domain Characterisation and Knowledge Acquisition In this paper we present the foundations of an approach to the characterisation of problem solving domains for the development of knowledge based systems. These foundations come from a broadly based, multi-disciplinary perspective which includes the cognitive sciences, computer science and the philosophy of science. The breadth of disciplines required reflects the need to deal with t...

View PDFchevron_right
The Science of Conceptual Modelling
Bernhard Thalheim

Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

References (21)

  1. Aussenac-Giltes N., "How to combine data abstraction and model refinement: a methodological contribution in Macao". A future for Knowledge Acquisition, Proc. of EKAW94. Berlin: Springer Verlag. LNAI 867, pp. 262-282. 1994.
  2. Aussenac-Gilles N., Matta N., "Making the method of problem solving explicit with Macao: the Sisyphus case-study ". International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 40, pp. 193-219. 1994.
  3. Beaubeau D., Aussenac N., Tchounikine P., "Mona au pays des roles". Rapport IRIT/96-23-R, Juil. 96.
  4. Beys B., Benjamins V. R., Van Heijst, G., " Remedying the Reusability -Usability Trade-off for Problem Solving Methods". Proc. of KAW'96, Gaines & Musen ed., Banff: SRDG Publications Univ., Nov. 1996.
  5. Bylander T., Chandrasekaran "Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: the right level of abstraction for knowledge acquisition". In B.R. Gaines & J. H. Boose, Eds. Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems. Vol. 1, pp. 65-87. London: Academic Press. 1988.
  6. Causse K., " Heuristic control knowledge ". Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems. Proc. of EKAW'93. Aussenac N., Boy G., Gaines B.. Linster M., Ganascia J.G., Kodratoff Y. Eds. LNAI 723. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. pp. 183-199. 1993.
  7. Delouis L Krivine J.P., "LISA, un langage r~flexif pour optrationaliser les modules d'expertise ". Revue d'lntelligence Artificielle. Volume 9:1. pp. 53-88. Paris: Hermb, s. t995.
  8. Istenes Z., Tchounikin¢ P., " Zola: a language to Operationalise Conceptual Models of Reasoning". Journal of Computing and Information (Proc. of Iccr96) 2:1, pp. 689-706, 1996.
  9. Leroux B., Laublet P., " Steps towards a Unified Approach to Knowledge Modelling". Proc. of Vlth European Japanese Conf. on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases. Amstctflam: IOS Press. 1995.
  10. Linster M.. " Knowledge Acquisition Based on Explicit Methods of Problem Solving ". PhD Thesis, Univ. of Kaiserslautem. Feb. 1992.
  11. Marcus S. McDermott J.," SALT: a knowledge acquisition tool for propo~ and revise systems". Artificial Intelligence, 39, pp. 1-37, 1989.
  12. Matta N., "M6thodes de r6solution de probl~mes: leur explicitation et leur reprc~,senmfion dans Macao-lr'. Th6se de l'Universit6 P. Sabatier, Toulouse. Oct. 1995.
  13. Pierret-Golbreich C. Talon X., "TFL, an algebraic language to specify the dynamic behavior of Knowiodg¢- Based Systems ". The Knowledge Engineering Review, Volume 11:3, pp. 253-280. 1996.
  14. Reynaud C., Ton F., "Using Explicit Ontologies to Create Problem Solving Methods ". International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 46, pp. 339-364. 1997.
  15. Schreiber G., Wielinga B., Akkermans H., Van de Welde W., Anjewierden A., "CIVIL: The CommonKADS Conceptual Modeling Language ". A future for Knowledge Acquisition. Steels L., Schrciber G., Van do Velde W., ¢~ls. LNAI n%67, pp. 1-2.5. Berlin: Springer Vertag. 1994.
  16. Swanout B., Gil Y., "Flexible knowledge acquisition through explicit representation of knowledge roles".
  17. AAAI Spring Syrup. Acquisition, learning and demonsu'ation: automating tasks for users. SUmford (USA). March 1996.
  18. Van Harmelen F. Balder .L, "(ML)2: A Formal language for KADS models of expertise ". Knowledge Acquisition, 4 (1), pp. 127-161, 1992. Special issue : "The KADS approach to knowledge engineering'.
  19. Van Heijst G., Schreiber A., Wielinga B. "Roles are not classes: a reply to Nicola Guarino ". International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 46, pp. 311-318. March 1997.
  20. Wielinga B., Schreiber G., Breuker .I., " KADS: a Modeling Approach to Knowledge Engineering". Knowledge Acquisition, 4(l). pp. 5-54, 1992. Special issue : 'The KADS approach to knowledge engin~dng'.
  21. Wielinga BJ. Van De Veld¢ W. Schreiber G. Akkermans H., "Towards a unification of knowlodge modelling approaches". In David, .I.-M., Krivine, .l.-P., Simmons R., exts., Second Generation Expert Systems, Springer-Verlag. 1992.

Related papers

The Notion of Role in Conceptual Modeling
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

In this article we analyse the notion of knowledge role. First of all, we present how the relationship between problem solving methods and domain models is tackled in different approaches. We concentrate on how they cope with this issue in the knowledge engineering process. Secondly, we introduce several properties which can be used to analyse, characterise and define the notion of role. We evaluate and compare the works exposed previously following these dimensions. This analysis suggests some developments to better exploit the relationship between reasoning and domain knowledge. We present them in a last section.

View PDFchevron_right
An Analysis of Roles: Towards Ontology-Based Modelling
Frank Loebe

Onto-Med Report, 2003

For decades, the concept of roles has frequently been discussed in the literature of various fields of computer science, such as conceptual modelling and knowledge representation, but an integrative definition of the concept has not yet been accomplished. On the basis of an extensive literature review, a general approach to roles is elaborated, which includes a system of classification. The motivation of this analysis comprises the integration of a well-founded concept of roles into the ontology-based knowledge representation language GOL (General Ontological Language).

View PDFchevron_right
Integrating techniques for conceptual modeling
Doug Skuce

Submitted to: 7th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 1992

Our goal is to facilitate the conceptual modeling of a domain using a flexible knowledge representation schema and supporting software. To facilitate this we have built several knowledge management systems, the latest one being CODE41 (Skuce and Lethbridge 1992)(Skuce 1992c). In the rest of this introduction we describe the type of knowledge engineering we do. In section 2 we describe eight major techniques and list some properties and advantages of each technique. We analyse several of our knowledge engineering projects to see what techniques were used and with what results. We describe how CODE4 has evolved to support these techniques in a highly integrated way, and where we see room for further automated assistance. Finally, we present some some heuristics that indicate what techniques seem most appropriate to what kind of project. 1 CODE stands for Conceptually Oriented Design/Description Environment. The current version is CODE4 which in a complete redesign of CODE2. The knowledge engineering projects described in this paper have used both versions. CODE3 was an experiment that was never used for practical knowledge engineering.

View PDFchevron_right
Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods
Dieter Fensel

Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1998

This paper gives an overview about the development of the field of Knowledge Engineering over the last 15 years. We discuss the paradigm shift from a transfer view to a modeling view and describe two approaches which considerably shaped research in Knowledge Engineering: Role-limiting Methods and Generic Tasks. To illustrate various concepts and methods which evolved in the last years we describe three modeling frameworks: CommonKADS, MIKE, and PROTÉGÉ-II. This description is supplemented by discussing some important methodological developments in more detail: specification languages for knowledge-based systems, problem-solving methods, and ontologies. We conclude with outlining the relationship of Knowledge Engineering to Software Engineering, Information Integration and Knowledge Management.

View PDFchevron_right
Models, methods, roles and tasks: Many labels—one idea?
angi voss

Knowledge Acquisition, 1990

We compare different approaches to the explicit modeling of problem solving processes in knowledge based systems to find out how they model knowledge, how they represent it, how flexible they are and to what degree they guide or support the development of knowledge based systems. We focus on Generic Tasks, KADS, role-limiting-methods and the method-to-task approach. For each approach we describe key concepts, motivations, premises, claims and achievements. These are used to compare the terminology of the approaches, and to establish a mediating terminology for the rest of the paper. The prominent models are compared to show which problem areas they cover, and what methods they use. We analyse each of the approaches under the following hypotheses: (1) it is useful to describe problem solving on a higher, more abstract level; (2) models of problem solving can be specified in a problem specific, but application-task independent way; (3) models guide the knowledge acquisition process and structure the knowledge base.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Computer Science
  • Knowledge Modeling
  • Problem solving methods
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved