Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Towards Generic Models of Player Experience

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment

https://doi.org/10.1609/AIIDE.V11I1.12806

Abstract

Context personalisation is a flourishing area of research with many applications. Context personalisation systems usually employ a user model to predict the appeal of the context to a particular user given a history of interactions. Most of the models used are context-dependent and their applicability is usually limited to the system and the data used for model construction. Establishing models of user experience that are highly scalable while maintaing the performance constitutes an important research direction. In this paper, we propose generic models of user experience in the computer games domain. We employ two datasets collected from players interactions with two games from different genres where accurate models of players experience were previously built. We take the approach one step further by investigating the modelling mechanism ability to generalise over the two datasets. We further examine whether generic features of player behaviour can be defined and used to boost the ...

References (35)

  1. Abou-Zleikha, M., and Shaker, N. 2015. Evolving random forest for preference learning. In Applications of Evolutionary Computa- tion. Springer. 318-330.
  2. Abou-Zleikha, M.; Shaker, N.; and Christensen, M. G. Preference learning with evolutionary-based multivariate adaptive regression spline model.
  3. Alrifai, M.; Gennari, R.; Tifrea, O.; and Vittorini, P. 2012. The user and domain models of the terence adaptive learning system. In International Workshop on Evidence-Based Technology Enhanced Learning, 83-90. Springer.
  4. Bakkes, S.; Whiteson, S.; Li, G.; Visniuc, G. V.; Charitos, E.; Hei- jne, N.; and Swellengrebel, A. 2014. Challenge balancing for per- sonalised game spaces. In Games Media Entertainment (GEM), 2014 IEEE, 1-8. IEEE.
  5. Bakkes, S.; Tan, C. T.; and Pisan, Y. 2012. Personalised gaming: a motivation and overview of literature. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System, 4. ACM.
  6. Bartle, R. 1996. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit muds. Journal of MUD research 1(1):19.
  7. Calvo, R. A., and D'Mello, S. 2010. Affect detection: An in- terdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on 1(1):18-37.
  8. Conati, C. 2002. Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in ed- ucational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence 16(7-8):555-575.
  9. Conati, C. 2011. Combining cognitive appraisal and sensors for affect detection in a framework for modeling user affect. In New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies. Springer. 71- 84.
  10. Cooper, A.; Reimann, R.; and Cronin, D. 2007. About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Heckmann, D.; Schwarzkopf, E.; Mori, J.; Dengler, D.; and Kröner, A. 2007. The user model and context ontology gumo revisited for future web 2.0 extensions. Contexts and Ontologies: Representa- tion and Reasoning 37-46.
  12. Hoque, M.; McDuff, D.; and Picard, R. 2012. Exploring temporal patterns in classifying frustrated and delighted smiles.
  13. Isbister, K.; Schwekendiek, U.; and Frye, J. 2011. Wriggle: An ex- ploration of emotional and social effects of movement. In Proceed- ings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1885-1890. ACM.
  14. Kobsa, A. 2001. Generic user modeling systems. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 11(1-2):49-63.
  15. Koster, R. 2004. A theory of fun for game design. Paraglyph press.
  16. Malone, T. 1981. What makes computer games fun? New York, NY, USA: ACM.
  17. Martínez, H.; Garbarino, M.; and Yannakakis, G. 2011. Generic physiological features as predictors of player experience. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction 267-276.
  18. Niederée, C.; Stewart, A.; Mehta, B.; and Hemmje, M. 2004. A multi-dimensional, unified user model for cross-system personal- ization. In Proceedings of the AVI 2004 Workshop on Environments for Personalized Information Access, 34-54.
  19. Ortony, A.; Clore, G.; and Collins, A. 1990. The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge university press.
  20. Pantic, M., and Rothkrantz, L. 2003. Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE 91(9):1370-1390.
  21. Pedersen, C.; Togelius, J.; and Yannakakis, G. N. 2010. Model- ing player experience for content creation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 2(1):54-67.
  22. Picard, R. 1995. Affective computing. Perceptual Computing Sec- tion, Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Scherer, K. 2005. What are emotions? and how can they be mea- sured? Social science information 44(4):695-729.
  23. Sebe, N.; Cohen, I.; and Huang, T. 2005. Multimodal emotion recognition. Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vi- sion 4:387-419.
  24. Shaker, N.; Abou-Zleikha, M.; and Shaker, M. Active learning for player modeling.
  25. Shaker, N.; Shaker, M.; Abu-Abdallah, I.; Al-Zengi, M.; and Sarhan, M. H. 2013. A quantitative approach for modelling and personalizing player experience in first-person shooter games. In UMAP Workshops.
  26. Shaker, M.; Al-Zengi, M.; Abu-Abdallah, I.; Sarhan, M. H.; and Shaker, N. 2015. Personalizing content generation in first person shooter games through player modeling. In to appear. Shaker, N.; Togelius, J.; and Yannakakis, G. N. 2010. Towards automatic personalized content generation for platform games. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE). AAAI Press. Shaker, N.; Yannakakis, G. N.; and Togelius, J. 2012. Crowd- sourcing the aesthetics of platform games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and Games, Special Issue on Compu- tational Aesthetics in Games.
  27. Sweetser, P., and Wyeth, P. 2005. Gameflow: a model for evaluat- ing player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 3(3):3-3.
  28. Viviani, M.; Bennani, N.; and Egyed-Zsigmond, E. 2010. A sur- vey on user modeling in multi-application environments. In Ad- vances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Tech- nologies and Services (CENTRIC), 2010 Third International Con- ference On, 111-116. IEEE.
  29. Wöllmer, M.; Kaiser, M.; Eyben, F.; Schuller, B.; and Rigoll, G. 2013. Lstm-modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovi- sual affect recognition framework. Image and Vision Computing 31(2):153-163.
  30. Yannakakis, G., and Hallam, J. 2006. Towards Capturing and En- hancing Entertainment in Computer Games. In Advances in Ar- tificial Intelligence, volume 3955 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. 432-442.
  31. Yannakakis, G. N., and Hallam, J. 2009. Real-time Game Adap- tation for Optimizing Player Satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 1(2):121-133.
  32. Yannakakis, G. N., and Togelius, J. 2011. Experience-Driven Pro- cedural Content Generation. IEEE Transactions on Affective Com- puting.
  33. Yannakakis, G. N.; Maragoudakis, M.; and Hallam, J. 2009. Prefer- ence learning for cognitive modeling: a case study on entertainment preferences. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernet- ics. Part A 39:1165-1175.
  34. Zakharov, K.; Mitrovic, A.; and Johnston, L. 2008. Towards emotionally-intelligent pedagogical agents. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 19-28. Springer.
  35. Zeng, Z.; Pantic, M.; Roisman, G.; and Huang, T. 2009. A sur- vey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(1):39-58.