Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Psychiatry

Psychiatric comorbidity: a concept in need of a theory

Profile image of Julie NordgaardJulie Nordgaard

2023, Psychological Medicine

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723001605
visibility

…

description

7 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Despite being a relatively new concept, psychiatric comorbidity, i.e. the co-occurrence of two or more mental disorders, has become widespread in clinical practice and psychiatric research. In this article, we trace the origin of the concept of psychiatric comorbidity, discuss the conceptual literature and point to basic problems concerning inadequate definition of the concept, differential diagnostic issues, and reification of mental disorders. We illustrate how these problems may have consequences for diagnostic assessment in current clinical practice and psychiatric research. To address some of the problems related to psychiatric comorbidity, we discuss potential principles for assessing psychiatric comorbidity. Inspired by Feinstein's original concept of comorbidity in general medicine and his differential diagnostic principles, we emphasize the importance of independence of mental disorders when assessing psychiatric comorbidity. We suggest that knowledge of trait v. state conditions and of the multitudinous clinical manifestations beyond what is captured in the diagnostic manuals may be helpful for assessing the independence of mental disorders and thus psychiatric comorbidity. We further argue that a more hierarchical diagnostic system and explicit exclusionary rules could improve clinical practice and research by reducing informational complexity and combating unwarranted psychiatric comorbidity.

Related papers

Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity The Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity section will focus on the prevalence and impact of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic medical illness as well as the prevalence and impact of medical disorders in patients with chronic psychiatric illness. Mental diso...
Maria Medina-mora

2007

The Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity section will focus on the prevalence and impact of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic medical illness as well as the prevalence and impact of medical disorders in patients with chronic psychiatric illness.

View PDFchevron_right
The one and the many: a case highlighting comorbidity and complexity in psychiatry
Ruth Cain

BJPsych Bulletin

Diagnostic categorisation is a typical stage of the medical model. Nevertheless, it is important to consider what is helpful to both the clinician and the patient when symptoms, experiences and perceptions are categorised. In this case report, we address the problem of comorbidity and complexity in psychiatry. Research and clinical experience point to significant overlap between personality disorders, mood disorders, and developmental disorders such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In the face of such complexity, we discuss ways of addressing and managing multiple diagnoses in clinical practice. We synthesise the perspectives and views of a general practice trainee, two consultant psychiatrists and a person with lived experience.

View PDFchevron_right
Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity The Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity section will focus on the prevalence and impact of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic medical illness as well as the prevalence and impact of medical disorders in patients with chronic psychiatric illness. Depression ...
James Fauerbach

2007

The Psychiatric-Medical Comorbidity section will focus on the prevalence and impact of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic medical illness as well as the prevalence and impact of medical disorders in patients with chronic psychiatric illness.

View PDFchevron_right
Clinicians' conceptual use of comorbidity
Jared Keeley

2009

Diagnostic overlap, termed comorbidity, is a common occurrence in psychopathology. However, the current classification system for mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR; APA, 2000) does not explicitly address how diagnostic concepts should be combined. The DSM assumes an additive model where the study of how humans combine concepts in general would predict some degree of multiplicative combination. The study described herein used the methods of cognitive psychology to examine practicing clinicians' conceptualizations of comorbid cases. Two samples of clinicians drawn from the Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT; n = 48) and licensed psychologists in the state of Florida (n = 25) were asked to describe three disorders and their combinations using a predetermined list of symptoms. The primary evidence of a multiplicative model of combination was the presence of overextensions, or symptoms which occurred in a combination that were not a part of either constituent disorder. v Results indicated that clinicians included overextensions in non-zero amounts demonstrating use of some level of a multiplicative model in contrast to the additive model assumed in the DSM. These findings question the clinical utility of the current diagnostic system and suggest that the current paradigm of descriptive psychopathology may not be congruent with clinicians' conceptualizations.

View PDFchevron_right
Multimorbidity of psychiatric disorders as an indicator of clinical severity
Jules Angst

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2002

s Abstract The present study examines the clinical and research significance of the high frequency of multiple diagnoses emanating from the non-hierarchical descriptive approach to classification in the current psychiatric diagnostic systems. Data from a 15-year prospective cohort study of young adults from the general community were employed to evaluate the frequency of multiple disorders (i. e., multimorbidity), and the extent to which patterns of multiple disorders are associated with indicators of severity of psychopathology. The average number of lifetime disorders in this community-based sample was 2.1 with a range from 0 to 7. Associations within diagnostic spectra were more common than those between diagnostic spectra. The results confirm the link between comorbidity and severity demonstrated in several previous studies and further show that there is a direct increase in nearly all of the indicators of severity by the number of disorders for which the subjects met criteria across 15 years. Each of the major diagnostic categories, particularly depression, contributed to increased severity rather than representing a non-specific effect of the number of disorders. These findings demonstrate the importance of characterization of multiple syndromes rather than applying arbitrary hierarchical distinctions between diagnostic categories. s

View PDFchevron_right
Psychiatric-medical comorbidity: Implications for health services delivery and for research on depression
Joel Streim

Biological Psychiatry, 1994

View PDFchevron_right
Medical Comorbidity in Inpatients with Psychiatric Disorders
International Journal of Research & Review (IJRR)

https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.6_Issue.8_Aug2019/Abstract_IJRR0033.html, 2019

Background: Comorbid Medical in Psychiatric patients is under-recognized, underdiagnosed, under-evaluated and undertreated. Psychiatric patients with co-occurring medical disorders are found to have severe symptoms, earlier age of onset, inadequate response to drugs, poor recovery, decreased quality of life and unfavourable course and outcome. Aims: 1. To evaluate the frequency and nature of medical comorbidity in inpatients with psychiatric disorders. 2. To study the relationship between medical comorbidity and socio-demographic factors and the clinical variables of the psychiatric disorders. Method/ Materials: In-patients with psychiatric disorders were evaluated for the presence of medical comorbidity and its presence was compared with socio-demographic details, clinical variables and with the psychiatric disorder. Results obtained were analyzed with IBM SPSS statistics 21 using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact T test. Results: 152 (50.7 %) patients had comorbid medical disorder. Most common medical comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (n=55, 36.18%) followed by hypertension (n=30, 19.73%). Sixty eight (22.66%) patients had more than one comorbid medical disorders. Age, Marital Status, Socioeconomic status, Total duration of the disorder, number of past episodes, Course of the disorder and Body mass index were found to have statistically significant relation with presence of medical disorder. Bipolar affective disorders was the only disorder with a statistically significant relation to the presence of comorbid medical disorder (N=85, 59.4%). Mood disorders were found to have highly significant relation to the occurrence of medical disorders. Conclusion: Medical comorbidity is common among patients with psychiatric disorder. Early diagnosis and treatment will reduce significant morbidity and mortality rate.

View PDFchevron_right
Comorbidity within mental disorders: a comprehensive analysis based on 145 990 survey respondents from 27 countries
juan carlos stagnaro

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 2020

Aims Epidemiological studies indicate that individuals with one type of mental disorder have an increased risk of subsequently developing other types of mental disorders. This study aimed to undertake a comprehensive analysis of pair-wise lifetime comorbidity across a range of common mental disorders based on a diverse range of population-based surveys. Methods The WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys assessed 145 990 adult respondents from 27 countries. Based on retrospectively-reported age-of-onset for 24 DSM-IV mental disorders, associations were examined between all 548 logically possible temporally-ordered disorder pairs. Overall and time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Absolute risks were estimated using the product-limit method. Estimates were generated separately for men and women. Results Each prior lifetime mental disorder was associated with an increased risk of subsequent first onset...

View PDFchevron_right
Comorbidities Among Persons With Incident Psychiatric Condition
Kyle Fluegge

Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2016

Objective: I sought to determine how medical comorbidities co-exist with incident psychiatric condition. Method: I used data from all 11 available waves (1992-2012) of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). I identified 4,358 index participants with self-reported incident psychiatric condition. I collected comorbidity data from participants preceding, including, and succeeding that incident wave. Comorbidities assessed included high blood pressure (HBP), diabetes mellitus, cancer, lung disease, heart disease, stroke, and arthritis. Modified Poisson regression combined with log-linked binomial regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of reporting a comorbidity preceding and following the incident wave. Multiple comparison testing dictated significance of RRs with p < .007. Results: For the waves preceding the index wave, the RRs of reporting all comorbidities except HBP and cancer were significantly ( p < .007) increased. For the waves following incident psychiatric...

View PDFchevron_right
An epidemiologic and clinical overview of medical and psychopathological comorbidities in major psychoses
Marta Serati, Riccardo Paoli

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2011

The presence of comorbidity in major psychoses (e.g., schizophrenia and psychotic subtypes of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder) seems to be the rule rather than the exception in both DSM-IV and ICD-10. Examining comorbidity in major psychoses, however, requires an investigation into the different levels of comorbidity (either full-blown and subsyndromal) which should be analyzed in both psychopathological and medical fields. On one hand, the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in major psychoses may be the result of the current nosographic systems. On the other hand, it may stem from a common neurobiological substrate. In fact, comorbid psychopathological conditions may share a biological vulnerability, given that dysfunction in specific brain areas may be responsible for different symptoms and syndromes. The high rates of comorbidity in major psychoses require targeted pharmacological treatments in order to effectively act on both the primary diagnosis and comorbid conditions. Nevertheless, few controlled trials in comorbid major psychoses had been carried out and treatment recommendations in this field have mostly an empirical basis. The aim of the present article is to provide a comprehensive and updated overview in relation to epidemiological and clinical issues of comorbidity in major psychoses.

View PDFchevron_right

References (59)

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revised). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
  4. American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text revised). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
  5. Andreasen, N. C. (2007). DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 108-112.
  6. Andrews, G., Henderson, S., & Hall, W. (2001). Prevalence, comorbidity, dis- ability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 145-153.
  7. Aragona, M. (2009). The role of comorbidity in the crisis of the current psy- chiatric classification system. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 16, 1-11.
  8. Boyd, J. H., Burke, J. D. Jr., Gruenberg, E., Holzer, C. E. 3rd, Rae, D. S., George, L. K., … Nestadt, G. (1984). Exclusion criteria of DSM-III. A study of co-occurrence of hierarchy-free syndromes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 983-989.
  9. Bürgy, M. (2007). Obsession in the strict sense: A helpful psychopathological phenomenon in the differential diagnosis between obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. Psychopathology, 40, 102-110.
  10. Caron, C., & Rutter, M. (1991). Comorbidity in child psychopathology: Concepts, issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 32, 1063-1080.
  11. Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., … Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119-137.
  12. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2018). All for one and one for all: Mental disorders in one dimension. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 831-844.
  13. Clark, L. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psy- chopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505-521.
  14. Cohen, B. M., & Öngür, D. (2023). The need for evidence-based updating of ICD and DSM models of psychotic and mood disorders. Molecular Psychiatry.
  15. Elvevåg, B., & Goldberg, T. E. (2000). Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is the core of the disorder. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, 14, 1-21.
  16. Etchecopar-Etchart, D., Korchia, T., Loundou, A., Llorca, P. M., Auquier, P., Lançon, C., … Fond, G. (2021). Comorbid major depressive disorder in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 47, 298-308.
  17. Faust, D., & Miner, R. A. (1986). The empiricist and his new clothes: DSM-III in perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 962-967.
  18. Feinstein, A. R. (1970). The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 23, 455-468.
  19. First, M. B. (2005). Mutually exclusive versus co-occurring diagnostic categor- ies: The challenge of diagnostic comorbidity. Psychopathology, 38, 206-210.
  20. Frances, A. J., Widiger, T., & Fyer, M. R. (1990). The influence of classification methods on comorbidity. In J. D. Maser & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 41-59). Washington: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
  21. Henriksen, M. G., Raballo, A., & Nordgaard, J. (2021). Self-disorders and psy- chopathology: A systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8, 1001-1012.
  22. Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reifi- cation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155-179.
  23. Jablensky, A. (2004). The syndrome -an antidote to spurious comorbidity? World Psychiatry, 3, 24-25.
  24. Jablensky, A. (2005). Categories, dimensions and prototypes: Critical issues for psychiatric classification. Psychopathology, 38, 201-205.
  25. Jaspers, K. (1997). General psychopathology. London: John Hopkins University Press.
  26. Kaplan, M. H., & Feinstein, A. R. (1974). The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 27, 387-404.
  27. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4-12.
  28. Kendell, R. E. (1975). The role of diagnosis in psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  29. Kendler, K. S. (1990). Toward a scientific psychiatric nosology. Strengths and limitations. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 969-973.
  30. Kendler, K. S. (2014). DSM issues: Incorporation of biological tests, avoidance of reification, and an approach to the 'box canyon problem'. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 1248-1250.
  31. Kendler, K. S. (2016a). The phenomenology of major depression and the rep- resentativeness and nature of DSM criteria. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 771-780.
  32. Kendler, K. S. (2016b). Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representa- tiveness of modern diagnostic criteria. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1082-1092.
  33. Kendler, K. S. (2022). Potential lessons for DSM from contemporary philoso- phy of science. JAMA Psychiatry, 79, 99-100.
  34. Kendler, K. S., & Zachar, P. (2008). The incredible insecurity of psychiatric nosology. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psych- iatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology (pp. 368-383). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  35. Klerman, G. L. (1990). Approaches to the phenomena of comorbidity. In Maser, J. D., & Cloninger, C. R. (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 13-37). Washington: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
  36. Leckman, J. F., Weissman, M. M., Merikangas, K. R., Pauls, D. L., & Prusoff, B. A. (1983). Panic disorder and major depression. Increased risk of depres- sion, alcoholism, panic, and phobic disorders in families of depressed pro- bands with panic disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1055-1060.
  37. Lieberman, J. A., Kane, J. M., & Alvir, J. (1987). Provocative tests with psychos- timulant drugs in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology, 91, 415-433.
  38. Lilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015). Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: A list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1100.
  39. Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., & Israel, A. C. (1994). A critical examination of the use of the term and concept of comorbidity in psychopathology research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 71-83.
  40. Maj, M. (2005a). The aftermath of the concept of 'psychiatric comorbidity'. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74, 67-68.
  41. Maj, M. (2005b). 'Psychiatric comorbidity': An artefact of current diagnostic systems? British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 182-184.
  42. Maser, J. D., & Cloninger, C. R. (1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and mood dis- orders: Introduction and overview. In Maser, J. D., & Cloninger, C. R. (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 3-12). Washington: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
  43. Meehl, P. E. (2001). Comorbidity and taxometrics. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 507-519.
  44. Mølstrøm, I.-M., Henriksen, M. G., & Nordgaard, J. (2020). Differential-diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients. Psychiatry Research, 291, 113302.
  45. Owen, G. (2023). What is formulation in psychiatry? Psychological Medicine, 53, 1-8.
  46. Parnas, J. (2011). A disappearing heritage: The clinical core of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 1121-1130.
  47. Pincus, H. A., Tew, J. D., & First, M. B. (2004). Psychiatric comorbidity: Is more less? World Psychiatry, 3, 18-23.
  48. Plana-Ripoll, O., Pedersen, C. B., Holtz, Y., Benros, M. E., Dalsgaard, S., de Jonge, P., … McGrath, J. J. (2019). Exploring comorbidity within mental disorders among a Danish National Population. JAMA Psychiatry, 259-270.
  49. Rasmussen, A. R., & Parnas, J. (2022). What is obsession? Differentiating obsessive-compulsive disorder and the schizophrenia spectrum. Schizophrenia Research, 243, 1-8.
  50. Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psy- chiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 983-987.
  51. Strålin, P., & Hetta, J. (2019). First episode psychosis and comorbid ADHD, autism and intellectual disability. European Psychiatry, 55, 18-22.
  52. Trull, T. J., Scheiderer, E. M., & Tomko, R. L. (2012). Axis II comorbidity. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 219-236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  53. van Praag, H. M. (1996). Comorbidity (psycho) analysed. British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement, 30, 129-134.
  54. Vella, G., Aragona, M., & Alliani, D. (2000). The complexity of psychiatric comorbidity: A conceptual and methodological discussion. Psychopathology, 33, 25-30.
  55. Wakefield, J. C. (2016). Diagnostic issues and controversies in DSM-5: Return of the false positives problem. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 105-132.
  56. Widiger, T. A., & Ford-Black, M. M. (1994). Diagnoses and disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 84-87.
  57. Wittchen, H. U. (1996). What is comorbidity -fact or artefact? British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement, 30, 7-8.
  58. World Health Organization (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  59. Wyrsch, J. (1930). Psychiatrie als Wissenschaft. Neue Schweizer Rundschau, 4, 284-295.

Related papers

Psychiatric comorbidity: concepts, controversies and alternatives
Vladan Starcevic

Australasian Psychiatry, 2005

To review various concepts of psychiatric comorbidity, their implications, surrounding controversies and underlying issues. A further aim is to propose an alternative term that might be more clinically useful and meaningful for describing the coexistence of mental disorders.

View PDFchevron_right
Psychiatric comorbidity: is more less?
Michael First

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2004

With each successive revision of the DSM and ICD, psychiatric comorbidity has become more prevalent. The 'atheoretical' approaches of the DSM and ICD explicitly encourage multiple diagnoses with few exclusionary hierarchies, in the hope that all clinically relevant information will be captured. However, the current strategy of diagnosing 'maximal' comorbidity may not reflect 'optimal' comorbidity. Many clinicians and health information systems, particularly those in developing countries, have a limited capacity for capturing this diagnostic information, and fail to characterize additional diagnoses that are present. This article will address the evolution of our current diagnostic system as a way of understanding the emergence of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. Alternative diagnostic approaches (a dimensional system, diagnostic hierarchies, and mixed diagnostic categories) that could be used to address the emergence of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses are consi...

View PDFchevron_right
Emerging clinical trends and perspectives on comorbid patterns of mental disorders in research
Guy Chouinard

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2014

Comorbidity is a well-established and documented phenomenon in mental disorders and medicine with heuristic value. The concept of comorbidity remains however poorly defined and lacks a comprehensive and coherent theoretical framework. There is a need to develop coherent methodological strategies in order to promote a fuller understanding of the implications of comorbidity and to exploit its potential value with regard to etiopathogenic and therapeutic issues. This position paper makes recommendations of improved methodological standards and procedures and discusses a range of options that can provide incremental information that is likely to improve therapeutic outcomes. Copyright

View PDFchevron_right
Comorbidity as an epistemological challenge to modern psychiatry
Crossing Dialogues

In spite of a considerable progress in comorbidity research and huge literature on it, this phenomenon is one of the greatest epistemological, research and clinical challenges to contemporary psychiatry and medicine. Mental disorders are very often comorbidly expressed, both among themselves and with various sorts of somatic diseases and illnesses. Therefore, comorbidity studies have been expected to be an impetus to research on the validity of current diagnostic systems as well as on establishing more effective and effi cient treatment within the frame of person centered transdisciplinary psychiatry and integrative medicine. This review focuses fi rst on conceptual chaos and different connotations, then on transdisciplinary perspectives of comorbidity and multimorbidity. The authors compiled an extensive set of various views and perspectives, dilemmas and controversies, in order to evaluate what we know and what we don’t about comorbidity, what comorbidity is and what comorbidity is not, what are facts and what are non-facts on comorbidity and multimorbidity.

View PDFchevron_right
Comorbidity in Child Psychiatric Diagnosis: Conceptual Complications
S. Brian Hood
View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychiatric nosology
  • Psychiatric Comorbidity
  • Public health systems and servic...
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved