Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve
2009, RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Abstract
Modern forms of energy are an important vehicle towards poverty alleviation in rural areas of developing countries. Mo s t d e v e l o p i n g c o u n t r i e s ' h o u s e h o l d s heavily rely on wood fuel which impact their health and social-economic status. To ease such a dependency, other modern forms of energy, namely electricity, need to be provided. However, the quality of the electricity service, namely reliability, is an important factor in reducing this dependency. This paper discusses a choice experiment valuation study conducted among electrified rural households located in Kisumu, Kenya, in which the willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid power outages or blackouts was estimated. A mixed logit estimation was applied to identify the various socioeconomic and demographic characteristics which determine preferences to reduce power outages among a h o u s e h o l d ' s users. In conclusion, several of the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics outlined in this paper were identified and can assist service differentiation to accommodate the diverse households' preferences towards the improvement of the electricity service.
References (48)
- Alberini, A., Longo, A., Veronesi, M., 2007. Basic statistical models for stated choice studies, in: Kanninen, B.J. (Ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 203-208.
- Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., 2001. Using choice experiment for non- market valuation. Economics, 52 [online]. Available from: http://dmsweb.moore.sc.edu/glenn/Manila/choice/Using%20Choice%20Experiments %20for%20Non-Market%20Valuation.pdf. [Accessed 10 October 2006]
- Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., 2002. Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. Energy Policy, 30(2), 107- 116. An, L., Lupi, F., Liu, J., Linderman, M.A., Huang, J., 2002. Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity implications for giant panda habitat conservation. Ecological Economics, 42, 445-457.
- Aravena, C., Martinsson, P., Scarpa, R., 2006. Does money talk? The effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal rate of substitution in a choice experiment. The Third World Congress of Environment and Resource Economists, 3-7 July 2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Arkesteijn, K., Oerelemans, L., 2005. The early adoption of green power by Dutch households. An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy, 33, 183-196.
- Beenstock, M., Goldin, E., Haitovsky, Y., 1998. Response bias in a conjoint analysis of power outages. Energy Economics, 20, 135-156.
- Bergmann, A., Hanley, N., Wright, R., 2006. Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy, 34, 1004-1014.
- Bierlaire, M., 2003. BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Monte- Verità, Ascona, Switzerland, March 19-21 2003, Ed. by Tristan Chevroulet and Aymeric Sevestre.
- Bierlaire, M., 2008. An introduction to BIOGEME Version 1.7. biogeme.epfl.ch
- Brownstone, D., 2001. Discrete choice modelling for transportation, in: Hensher, D.A. (Ed.), Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 97- 124. Bloemhof, G.A., Hulshorst, W.T.J and Janssen, J., 2001. 25 Years outage data, ready for the future [online]. Proceedings of the CIRED2001, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 18- 21 June 2001. (Conference Publication No. 4820 IEE 2001). Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7501/20407/00942898.pdf [Accessed on 28 August 2008].
- Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., 2008. Does it matter when a power outage occurs? -A choice experiment study on willingness to pay to avoid power outages. Energy Economics, 30, 1232-1245.
- Caves, D.W., Herriges, J.A., and Windle, R.J. 1990, The cost of electric power interruptions in industrial sector: Estimates derived from interruptible service programs, Land economics, 68(1), 49-61
- Champ, P.A., 2003. Collecting survey data for nonmarket valuation, in: Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J, Brown T.C. (Eds.) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 59-99
- Doane, M., Hartman, R., Woo, C.K., 1988. Household preference for interruptible rate options and the revealed value of service reliability. Energy Journal, 9, 121-134.
- Eberhard, A., Gratwick, K., 2005. The Kenyan IPP experience. Program on energy and sustainable development, Center for Environmental Science and Policy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University (Working Paper No. 49).
- Electricity Regulatory Board (ERB), 2005. Retail Electricity Tariffs Review Policy, Nairobi: Kenya, Available from: http://www.erc.go.ke/feed-in-tariffs.pdf [Accessed 10 August 2008] Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2004. Country analysis brief: Great Lakes Region: Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda [online].
- Washington DC: EIA. Available from:http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/eafrica.html [Accessed 20 October 2007]
- Fosgerau, M., Bierlaire, M., 2007. A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41, 784-794.
- Global Network on Energy for Sustainable Development (GNESD), 2004. Energy Access theme results: Synthesis/compilation report [online].Available from: http://www.gnesd.org/Downloadables/Energy_Access_I/Synthesis_Report_ver_30_A pri2004.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2007].
- Goett, G., Hudson K., Train, K., 2000. C u s t o me r s ' c h o i c e a mo n g r e t a i l e n e r g y suppliers: The willingness to pay for service attributes. Energy Journal, 21, 1-28.
- Han, S.Y, Yoo, S.H., Kwak, S.J., 2008. Valuing multiple environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: A choice experiment study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 256-266.
- Hanley, N., Mourato, S., Wright, R.E., 2001. Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-462.
- Hanley, N., Wright, R.E, Adamowicz, V., 1998. Using choice experiments to value the environment: Design issues, current experience and future prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4), 413-428.
- Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., 2003. The mixed logit: The state of practice. Transportation, 30, 133-176.
- Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H., 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Hess, S., Polak, J.W., Axhausen, K.W., 2006. Distributional assumptions in mixed logit models, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (Paper #06-2065).
- Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., Fernández-Macho, J., 2009. The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 68, 2372-2381. , S u p p l y a n d Policy Strategy for Households, Small Scale Industries and Service Establishments, Final Report, Nairobi: KAMFOR Company Limited.
- Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2000. Household energy consumption survey. Nairobi: KNBS. [Online] Available from: http://www.cbs.go.ke/ [Accessed 18 October 2008].
- Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2007. Kenya facts and figures. Nairobi: KNBS. [Online] Available from: http://www.cbs.go.ke/downloads/pdf/kenya_facts_and_figures_2007_(a).pdf?SQMSE SSID=d8b45049904d6331d39448859bcdd41a [Accessed 19 October 2007].
- Kenya Power and Lighting Company, Ltd., 2008b. KPLC to launch power interruption SMS notice [online]. Press statement July 2008, Available from: http://www.kplc.co.ke/displayPage.asp?top_level_id=3 [Accessed 10 August 2008]
- Krinsky, I., Robb, A., 1986. On approximating to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 715-719.
- Ladenburg, J., Dubgaard, A., Martinsen, L., Tranberg, J., 2005. Economic valuation of the visual externalities of off-shore wind farms. Food and Resources Economic Institute, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen (Report no.
- Lacommare, K.H. and Eto, J. H., 2006. Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States (US). Energy, 31, 1845-1855.
- Lancaster, K., 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132-157.
- Longo, A., Markandya, A., Petrucci, M., 2008. The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: Willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy. Ecological Economics, 67 (1), 140-152.
- Louviere J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J., 2000. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York.
- McFadden, D., Train, K., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (5), 447-470.
- Ministry of Finance and Planning (MoFP), 2002. Kisumu: District development plan 2002-2008. Republic of Kenya, The Government Printer, Nairobi.
- Mogas, J., Riera, P., Bennett, J., 2006. A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions. Journal of Forest Economics, 12, 5-
- Munasinghe, M., 1980. Costs incurred by residential electricity consumers due to power failures. Journal of Consumer research, 6(4), 361-369
- Osborne, J., Kawann, C., 2001. Reliability of the US electricity system: Recent trends and current issues. Berkeley, CA, (Report Number LBNL-47043). [Online] Available from: http://eetd.lbl.gov/EA/EMP/emppubs.html [Accessed 12 August 2008]
- Renner, H., Fickert, L., 1999. Costs and responsibility of power quality in the deregulated electricity market. University of Technology, Department of Electrical Power Systems, Graz, Australia.
- Roe, B., Teisl, M., Levy, A., Russell, M., 2 0 0 1 . US c o n s u me r s ' wi l l i n g n e s s t o p a y f o r green electricity. Energy Policy, 29, 917-925.
- Salant, P. and Dillman, D.A.1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Sanghvi, A., Barnes, D., 2001. Rural electrification: Lessons learned. World Bank Findings, February, No. 177, [online] Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/afr/findings/english/find177.htm [Accessed on 23 April 2008]
- Silva, P. , Pagiola, A, S., 2003. A review of the environmental costs and benefits in World Bank projects. World Environmental Economics Series, World Bank, Washington DC (Paper No.
- Woo, C.K., Pupp, R.L., Flaim, T., Mango, R., 1991. How much do electric customers want to pay for reliability? New evidence on an old controversy. Energy Systems and Policy, 15, 145-159.