Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Evaluation of a Modified ADC-Based Thermometry Bridge

2011, International Journal of Thermophysics

https://doi.org/10.1007/S10765-011-1119-3

Abstract

This article presents the modification and testing of an ADC-based thermometry bridge. The instrument under investigation is an Anton Paar MKT 50 Millikelvin Thermometer (developed at the IFE, TU-Graz) based on a precision analog-to-digital converter (ADC). During preliminary testing, it was found that the MKT 50 performs better than its declared uncertainty (1 mK equal to 1 ppm when using a 100 PRT) and is comparable to thermometry resistance ratio bridges typically used in secondary thermometry laboratories (with typical uncertainties from 0.1 mK to 1 mK). The modifications to the original bridge were undertaken by the development team of the MKT 50 at the Graz University of Technology, Austria. Measurements and evaluation of the modified instruments were performed at the MIRS/UL-FE/LMK. For the MKT 50 to be used in thermometry laboratories as a reference unit, measuring parameters of the instrument had to be changed. During the first modification, the upper limit of the instrument range was decreased from 400 to 133 , this is a preferred range for standard platinum resistance thermometers (SPRTs). This also meant an increase in the measuring current from 0.5 mA to the more frequently used 1 mA. A modification of the programmable ADC control unit increased the resolution from 24 bit to 27 bit. By adding a switch, the use of an external standard resistor was enabled. After this stage of the modification, the first tests on the instrument were performed. The second stage was aimed at the removal of noise sources. The instrument was

References (14)

  1. J. Bojkovski, J. Fischer, G. Machin, F. Pavese, A. Peruzzi, E. Renaot, E. Tegeler, Int. J. Thermophys. 30, 1 (2009)
  2. H. Preston-Thomas, Metrologia 27, 3 (1990)
  3. G.F. Strouse, M. Ballico, J. Bojkovski, M. de Groot, H.G. Liedberg, A.I. Pokhodun, Int. J. Thermophys. 29, 1193 (2008)
  4. G. Winkler, H. Hartl, C. Klapf, Ein batteriebetriebenes PT100-Thermometer mit einer Auflösung von 1/10
  5. Millikelvin, Informationstagung Mikroelektronik 2006, Schriftenreihe Nr. 43 ÖVE (Oct 2006), pp. 45-50
  6. H. Leopold, H. Stabinger, K.P. Schröcker, Resistance ratio measurement utilizing measuring currents of opposite plural direction, US Patent 5 351 010 (1994)
  7. S.Z. Avramov, N.M. Oldham, D.G. Jarrett, B.C. Waltrip, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 42, 131 (1993)
  8. S.Z. Avramov, G.N. Stenbakken, A.D. Koffman, N.M. Oldham, R.W. Gammon, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 44, 904 (1998)
  9. D.R. White, J.M. Williams, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 46, 329 (1997)
  10. G.F. Strouse, K.D. Hill, Performance Assessment of Resistance Ratio Bridges Used for the Calibra- tion of SPRTs, in Proceedings of Eight International Temperature Symposium (Chicago, IL, 2002), pp. 327-332
  11. B.V. Hamon, J. Sci. Instrum. 31, 450 (1954)
  12. T. Podgornik, J. Bojkovski, V. Batagelj, J. Drnovsek, Int. J. Thermophys. 29, 403 (2008)
  13. T. Podgornik, J. Bojkovsk, V. Batagelj, J. Drnovsek, Measurement 42, 1065 (2009)
  14. S. Rudtsch, G. Ramm, D. Heyer, R. Vollmert, Comparison of Test and Calibration Methods For Resis- tance Ratio Bridges, in Proceedings of TEMPMEKO 2004, 9th International Symposium on Tempera- ture and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science, ed. by D. Zvizdić, L.G. Bermanec, T. Veliki, T. Stašić (FSB/LPM, Zagreb, Croatia, 2004), pp. 773-780