Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Econometric Analysis
Empirical Literature Review and Data
Results
Alternative Cointegration Methods
References
All Topics
Economics
Econometrics

Inequality and the Us Import Demand Function

Profile image of Thomas MoutosThomas Moutos

2006, Social Science Research Network

https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.940354
visibility

…

description

39 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

In this paper we build a model of trade in vertically differentiated products and find that income inequality can affect the demand for imports even in the presence of homothetic preferences. The empirical importance of changes in inequality on the demand for imports is then assessed by examining US data for the 1948-1996 period. Using the Johansen (1988) procedure we find that there is no evidence of a long run relationship of a standard imports equation (one including imports, income, and relative prices). However, once we include a measure of inequality in our VAR specification we find not only evidence for the existence of a cointegrating equation in imports, income, relative prices and inequality, but that the evolution of inequality has a large and positive influence on the demand for imports in the US. Moreover we find that our results are robust to alternative methods of estimating cointegration equations.

Related papers

Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach
Devashish Mitra

2004

We construct the first direct classification of goods as luxuries or necessities that is compatible with international trade data. We then use it to test an idea that has not been tested directly in the literature: countries' income distributions are important determinants of their import demand, and in particular of the difference in their import demands of luxuries versus necessities. We interpret this result with the aid of a model in which preferences are nonhomothetic, thus relaxing a long-held and standard -but empirically dubious -assumption in the theory of international trade. Our model is strongly borne out by the results: imports of luxuries increase with importing country's inequality, and imports of necessities decrease with it. Our calculations imply that if income distribution in the United States became as equal as in Canada, the US would import about 9 -13% less in luxury goods and 13 -19% more in necessity goods. JEL Classification Codes: F12, D12

View PDFchevron_right
11.Price and Income Elasticities of Disaggregated Import Demand
Alexander Decker

This paper presents an empirical examination of the import demand for services, merchandise, petroleum, and other products in the Dominican Republic during the period of 1980-2005. Using the 'bounds' testing approach to co-integration of Pesaran et al. (2001), four import demand functions are estimated and all show the existence of a long-run equilibrium relationship between imports, relative prices and domestic income. These imports have long-run price demand elasticities below unity, indicating that relative prices have no effect on their demand. On the other hand, all the long-run domestic income demand elasticities are significantly above unity, demonstrating that imports are strongly affected by domestic economic activity. These results are shown to have important implications for sustainable economic growth in the Dominican Republic, particularly in the light of its recent membership in the Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA). Key words: price/income import demand elasticities, error correction model, 'bounds' test Hye, Q. M. A. (2008), Aggregate import demand function for Pakistan: analysis in the form of old and relatively new co-integration techniques, International Journal of Economic Perspective, 2, 236-245.

View PDFchevron_right
The effects of income distribution on consumer imports
ciaran driver

Journal of Macroeconomics, 1987

View PDFchevron_right
Inequality and the Relative Reliance on Tariffs
Thomas Moutos

Review of International Economics, 2010

In this paper we uncover the existence of a U-shaped relationship between inequality and the relative reliance on tariff revenue, by estimating a cross-sectional regression relating the ratio of the tariff rate over the tax rate to inequality and a set of control variables such as GDP per capita, openness, the degree of democracy, and area dummies.We explain this U-shaped relationship by means of a Ricardian model of trade in vertically differentiated products between a developing country and the (developed) rest of the world. The model generates the U-shaped relationship because the preferences of the political majority (as captured by the median voter model) are shaped not only by the influence of inequality on the desire for redistribution, but also by the influence of inequality on the relative size of the tax base on which income taxes and tariffs are applied.

View PDFchevron_right
Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries
marco vivarelli

World Development, 2009

We use a dynamic specification to estimate the impact of trade on within-country income inequality in a sample of 65 developing countries (DCs) over the 1980-1999 period. Our results suggest that trade with high income countries worsen income distribution in DCs, both through imports and exports. These findings provide support to the hypothesis that technological differentials and the skill biased nature of new technologies may be important factors in shaping the distributive effects of trade. Moreover, we observe that the previous results only hold for middle income countries (MICs); we interpret this evidence by considering the greater potential for technological upgrading in MICs. we wish to thank the discussant Paolo Piacentini and all the participants for their useful comments and suggestions. Precious insights by Mariacristina Piva and Gianluca Grimalda are also gratefully acknowledged. Finally, comments and suggestions by four anonymous referees were very useful for improving the submitted version of this paper. Usual caveats apply.

View PDFchevron_right
Trade Policy and the Household Distribution of Income
Hugo Rojasromagosa

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

We explore the theoretical relationship between import protection and the household distribution of income in general equilibrium. Based on CRRA preferences, the social welfare system implicit in Atkinson indexes, we decompose the welfare effect of protection into a real income level and variance component. These explicit inequality derivatives map import protection to inequalityadjusted welfare. They also yield empirical predictions for the linkages between trade protection, country size, level of development, and the level of inequality in a Heckscher-Ohlin and Ricardo-Viner world. Our decomposition of welfare and inequality may also prove parsimonious in applied general equilibrium applications focused on inequality.

View PDFchevron_right
Web Appendix for Trade and Inequality: From Theory to Estimation
Stephen Redding

2012

This web appendix contains the technical derivations for the theoretical results in the paper and reports additional empirical results and information concerning the data. Section A provides a full characterization of the structural model and discusses the relationship between the structural and reduced-form parameters. Section B deals with the econometric inference, including the derivations of the likelihood function, the set up of the GMM objective, and handling of measurement error.

View PDFchevron_right
Trade and wage inequality: Are they related?
KOUSHIK GHOSH

Atlantic Economic Journal, 2000

The objective of this paper is to investigate the relationship between net exports and wage inequality in the U.S. The short-and long-run analyses of the U.S. trade and wage data are undertaken. Cointegration test results indicate that net exports and wage inequality are related in the long run. The main contribution of this paper lies in its focus on the short-run investigation of the relationship between net exports and wage inequality. This investigation was conducted using the vector error correction (VEC) testing framework. Contrary to the prevailing view, the VEC test results indicate that trade has no statistically significant impact on wage inequality in the U.S. Instead, the empirical evidence shows a negative causal impact of wage inequality on net exports.

View PDFchevron_right
Inequality and Relative Reliance on Tariffs: Theory and Evidence
Thomas Moutos

In this paper we construct a Ricardian model of trade in vertically-differentiated products between a developing country and the (developed) rest of the world. Despite labour being the only factor of production in this model, tariffs (in addition to income taxes) have distributional consequences because the high-quality imported varieties are consumed only by high-income households. The model predicts a U-shaped relationship between income inequality and the median-voter’s preferred reliance on tariffs versus income taxes in order to effect the desired redistribution. Using data from 44 countries we test for the existence of this U-shaped relationship by estimating a cross-sectional regression relating the ratio of the tariff rate over the tax rate to inequality and a set of control variables such as GDP per capita, openness, the degree of democracy and area dummies. We find that the model’s predictions are supported by the data.

View PDFchevron_right
International Trade and Global Income Inequality
Emmanuel Anoruo, William Dipietro

2005

In the popular media, trade is quite often being used as a whipping boy and blamed for increased worldwide inequality. Is trade actually a source of greater income inequality around the world? What does the data show? Is there any reason to suspect trade as a major villain on the international scene? Does the data show that there is correlation between trade and inequality? To address these questions, this paper uses regression analysis to investigate whether there is any association between either the amount or the spread of international trade and two important dimensions of global income inequality, namely -income inequality between and within nations.

View PDFchevron_right

References (101)

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2002), "Technical Change, Inequality and the Labor Market", Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1, pp. 7-72.
  2. Armington, P.S. (1969), "A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of location", IMF Sta¤ Papers, 26, pp. 159-178.
  3. Boyd D., G.M. Caporale and R. Smith (2001), "Real Exchange Rate E¤ects on the Balance of Trade: Cointegratiopn and the Marshall-Lerner Condition", International Journal of Finance and Economics, 6, pp. 187-200
  4. Bowen, H.P., E. Leamer, and L. Sviekauskas (1987), "Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory", American Economic Review, 82, pp. 371-392.
  5. Brandolini A. (1998 ), "A Bird's-Eye View of Long-Run Changes in Income Inequality", Banca d'Italia Research Department.
  6. Chinn, M. (2005a), "Doomed to De…cits? Aggregate U.S. Trade Flows Re-Examined", Review of World Economics, 141(3), pp. 460-485.
  7. Chinn, M. (2005b), "Incomes, Exchange Rates and the U.S. trade De…cit, Once Again", International Finance, 7(3), pp. 1-19.
  8. Creedy, J. (1977), "Pareto and the Distribution of Income," Review of Income and Wealth, 23, pp. 405-411.
  9. Deininger, A. and L. Squire (1996), A new data set measuring inequality, WIDER, Word Bank.
  10. Flam, H. and E. Helpman (1987), "Vertical Product Di¤erentiation and North-South Trade", American Economic Review, 77, pp. 810-822.
  11. Francois, J.and S. Kaplan (1996), "Aggregate Demand Shifts, Income Distribution, and the Linder Hypothesis." Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 2 , pp. 244-250.
  12. Goldstein, M. and M.S. Khan (1985), "Income and Price E¤ects in Foreign Trade", in R. W. Jones and P.B.Kenen (eds), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 2, North-Holland, New York.
  13. Gonzalo, J. (1994), "Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium Relationships", Journal of Econometrics, 60, 203-233.
  14. Grossman, G. (1982), " Import competition from developed and developing countries", Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp. 271-281.
  15. Hansen, B. (2000), "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation", Econometrica, 68, pp.575-603.
  16. Hargreaves, C.P. (1994), "A Review of Methods of Estimating Cointegrating Relation- ships"in C.P. Hargreaves (ed.), Nonstationary Time Series Analysis and Cointegration, 87-132, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  17. Helkie, W. and P. Hooper (1988), "An Empirical Analysis of the External De…cit, 1980-86", in R. Bryant, G. Holtham and P. Hooper, External De…cits and the Dollar, Brookings Institution.
  18. Hooper, P., and J. Marquez (1995), "Exchange rates, prices, and external adjustment in the United States and Japan", in Kenen, P. (ed.), Understanding Interdependence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  19. Hooper, P, Johnson K. and J. Marquez (1998), "Trade Elasticities for G-7 Countries", International Finance Discussion Papers No. 609, Federal Reserve Board, Washington D.C. Houthakker, H., and S. Magee (1969), "Income and price elasticities in world trade", Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, pp.111-125.
  20. Hunter, L. (1991), "The Contribution of Nonhomothetic Preferences to Trade", Journal of International Economics 30, pp. 345-358.
  21. Inder, B. (1993), "Estimating Long-Run Relationships in Economics. A Comparison of Di¤erent Approaches", Journal of Econometrics, 57, pp. 53-68.
  22. Johansen, S. (1988), "Statistcal Analysis of Cointegration Vectors", Journal of Eco- nomic Dynamics and Control 12, pp. 231-254.
  23. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), "Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, pp. 169-210.
  24. Johansen, Soren, 1991. "Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models," Econometrica, 59, pp 1551-80.
  25. Johnston, L.D. and M. Chinn (1996), "How well is America Competing? A Comment on Papadakis", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(1), pp. 68-81.
  26. Katsimi, M. and T. Moutos (2005), "Inequality and Relative Reliance on Tari¤s: The- ory and Evidence", CESifo Working Paper No. 1457.
  27. Kohli, U.R. (1982), "Relative price e¤ects and the demand for imports", Canadian Journal of Economics, 15, pp. 205-219.
  28. Krugman, P. (1989), "Di¤erences in Income Elasticities and Trends in Real Exchange Rates", European Economic Review, 33, pp. 1031-1054.
  29. Linder, S. (1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, Almqvist and Wiksells, Uppsala.
  30. Malley, J.and T. Moutos, (2002), "Vertical product di¤erentiation and the import demand function: theory and evidence", Canadian Journal of Economics, 35, pp. 257- 281.
  31. Marquez, J. (2000), "The Puzzling Income Elasticity of US Imports", World Conference of Econometric Society.
  32. Marquez, J. (2002), Estimating Trade Elasticities, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
  33. Meade, E. (1991), "A Fresh Look at the Resposiveness of Trade Flows to Exchange Rates", Annual meeting of the Western Economic Association.
  34. Mitra, D. and V. Trindade (2003), "Inequality and Trade."NBER Working Paper No. 10087.
  35. Markusen, J. (1986), "Explaining the Volume of Trade: an Eclectic Approach", Amer- ican Economic Review, 76, 5, pp.1002-1011.
  36. Panopoulou, E. and N. Pittis (2004), "A Comparison of Autoregressive Distributed Lag and Dynamic OLS Cointegration Estimators in the Case of a Serially Correlated Cointegration Error", Econometrics Journal, 7, pp. 585-687.
  37. Pesaran, M.H. and Y. Shin (1999) "An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Ap- proach to Cointegration Analysis", in S. Strom (ed.) Econometrics and Economic The- ory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frish Centennial Symposium, Econometric So- ciety Monograph, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  38. Phillips, P.C.B. and B.E. Hansen (1990) "Statistical Inference in Instumental Variables Regression withI(1) Processes,"Review of Economic Studies, 57:99-125.
  39. Phillips, P.C.B. (1991) "Optimal Inference in Cointegrated Systems," Econometrica, 59, pp. 283-306.
  40. Phillips, P.C.B. and M. Loretan (1991), "Estimating Long-run Economic Equilibria", Review of Economic Studies, 58, pp. 407-436.
  41. Rose, A. (1991), "The Role of Exchange Rates in a Popular Model of International Trade: Does the 'Marshall-Lerner' Condition Hold?" Journal of International Eco- nomics, 30, pp. 301-316.
  42. Rose, A. and J. Yellen (1989), "Is there a J-Curve?", Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, pp. 53-68.
  43. Rosen, S. (1974), "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Di¤erentiation in Pure Competition", Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 34-55.
  44. Schott, P. (2003), "Across-Product versus Within-Product Specialization in Interna- tional Trade", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 657-691.
  45. Tre ‡er, D. (1995), "The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries," American Economic Review, 85, pp.1029-1046.
  46. CESifo Working Paper Series (for full list see T www.cesifo-group.de)T ___________________________________________________________________________ 1764 Didier Laussel and Raymond Riezman, Fixed Transport Costs and International Trade, July 2006
  47. 1765 Rafael Lalive, How do Extended Benefits Affect Unemployment Duration? A Regression Discontinuity Approach, July 2006
  48. 1766 Eric Hillebrand, Gunther Schnabl and Yasemin Ulu, Japanese Foreign Exchange Intervention and the Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate: A Simultaneous Equations Approach Using Realized Volatility, July 2006
  49. 1767 Carsten Hefeker, EMU Enlargement, Policy Uncertainty and Economic Reforms, July 2006 1768 Giovanni Facchini and Anna Maria Mayda, Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants: Welfare-State Determinants across Countries, July 2006
  50. 1769 Maarten Bosker and Harry Garretsen, Geography Rules Too! Economic Development and the Geography of Institutions, July 2006
  51. M. Hashem Pesaran and Allan Timmermann, Testing Dependence among Serially Correlated Multi-category Variables, July 2006
  52. 1771 Juergen von Hagen and Haiping Zhang, Financial Liberalization in a Small Open Economy, August 2006
  53. 1772 Alessandro Cigno, Is there a Social Security Tax Wedge?, August 2006 1773 Peter Egger, Simon Loretz, Michael Pfaffermayr and Hannes Winner, Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity, August 2006
  54. 1774 Jeremy S.S. Edwards, Wolfgang Eggert and Alfons J. Weichenrieder, The Measurement of Firm Ownership and its Effect on Managerial Pay, August 2006
  55. 1775 Scott Alan Carson and Thomas N. Maloney, Living Standards in Black and White: Evidence from the Heights of Ohio Prison Inmates, 1829 -1913, August 2006
  56. 1776 Richard Schmidtke, Two-Sided Markets with Pecuniary and Participation Externalities, August 2006
  57. 1777 Ben J. Heijdra and Jenny E. Ligthart, The Transitional Dynamics of Fiscal Policy in Small Open Economies, August 2006
  58. 1778 Jay Pil Choi, How Reasonable is the 'Reasonable' Royalty Rate? Damage Rules and Probabilistic Intellectual Property Rights, August 2006
  59. 1779 Ludger Woessmann, Efficiency and Equity of European Education and Training Policies, August 2006
  60. 1780 Gregory Ponthiere, Growth, Longevity and Public Policy, August 2006
  61. 1781 Laszlo Goerke, Corporate and Personal Income Tax Declarations, August 2006 1782
  62. Florian Englmaier, Pablo Guillén, Loreto Llorente, Sander Onderstal and Rupert Sausgruber, The Chopstick Auction: A Study of the Exposure Problem in Multi-Unit Auctions, August 2006
  63. 1783 Adam S. Posen and Daniel Popov Gould, Has EMU had any Impact on the Degree of Wage Restraint?, August 2006
  64. 1784 Paolo M. Panteghini, A Simple Explanation for the Unfavorable Tax Treatment of Investment Costs, August 2006
  65. 1785 Alan J. Auerbach, Why have Corporate Tax Revenues Declined? Another Look, August 2006 1786 Hideshi Itoh and Hodaka Morita, Formal Contracts, Relational Contracts, and the Holdup Problem, August 2006
  66. 1787 Rafael Lalive and Alejandra Cattaneo, Social Interactions and Schooling Decisions, August 2006
  67. 1788 George Kapetanios, M. Hashem Pesaran and Takashi Yamagata, Panels with Nonstationary Multifactor Error Structures, August 2006
  68. 1789 Torben M. Andersen, Increasing Longevity and Social Security Reforms, August 2006
  69. 1790 John Whalley, Recent Regional Agreements: Why so many, why so much Variance in Form, why Coming so fast, and where are they Headed?, August 2006
  70. 1791 Sebastian G. Kessing and Kai A. Konrad, Time Consistency and Bureaucratic Budget Competition, August 2006
  71. 1792 Bertil Holmlund, Qian Liu and Oskar Nordström Skans, Mind the Gap? Estimating the Effects of Postponing Higher Education, August 2006
  72. 1793 Peter Birch Sørensen, Can Capital Income Taxes Survive? And Should They?, August 2006 1794
  73. Michael Kosfeld, Akira Okada and Arno Riedl, Institution Formation in Public Goods Games, September 2006
  74. 1795 Marcel Gérard, Reforming the Taxation of Multijurisdictional Enterprises in Europe, a Tentative Appraisal, September 2006 Risk Taking, September 2006
  75. 1797 Dominique M. Gross and Nicolas Schmitt, Why do Low-and High-Skill Workers Migrate? Flow Evidence from France, September 2006
  76. 1798 Dan Bernhardt, Stefan Krasa and Mattias Polborn, Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias, September 2006
  77. 1799 Pierre Pestieau and Motohiro Sato, Estate Taxation with Both Accidental and Planned Bequests, September 2006
  78. 1800 Øystein Foros and Hans Jarle Kind, Do Slotting Allowances Harm Retail Competition?, September 2006
  79. 1801 Tobias Lindhe and Jan Södersten, The Equity Trap, the Cost of Capital and the Firm's Growth Path, September 2006
  80. 1802 Wolfgang Buchholz, Richard Cornes and Wolfgang Peters, Existence, Uniqueness and Some Comparative Statics for Ratio-and Lindahl Equilibria: New Wine in Old Bottles, September 2006
  81. 1803 Jan Schnellenbach, Lars P. Feld and Christoph Schaltegger, The Impact of Referendums on the Centralisation of Public Goods Provision: A Political Economy Approach, September 2006
  82. 1804 David-Jan Jansen and Jakob de Haan, Does ECB Communication Help in Predicting its Interest Rate Decisions?, September 2006
  83. 1805 Jerome L. Stein, United States Current Account Deficits: A Stochastic Optimal Control Analysis, September 2006
  84. 1806 Friedrich Schneider, Shadow Economies and Corruption all over the World: What do we really Know?, September 2006
  85. 1807 Joerg Lingens and Klaus Waelde, Pareto-Improving Unemployment Policies, September 2006
  86. 1808 Axel Dreher, Jan-Egbert Sturm and James Raymond Vreeland, Does Membership on the UN Security Council Influence IMF Decisions? Evidence from Panel Data, September 2006
  87. 1809 Prabir De, Regional Trade in Northeast Asia: Why do Trade Costs Matter?, September 2006 1810 Antonis Adam and Thomas Moutos, A Politico-Economic Analysis of Minimum Wages and Wage Subsidies, September 2006
  88. 1811 Guglielmo Maria Caporale and Christoph Hanck, Cointegration Tests of PPP: Do they also Exhibit Erratic Behaviour?, September 2006
  89. 1812 Robert S. Chirinko and Hisham Foad, Noise vs. News in Equity Returns, September 2006 1813
  90. Oliver Huelsewig, Eric Mayer and Timo Wollmershaeuser, Bank Behavior and the Cost Channel of Monetary Transmission, September 2006
  91. 1814 Michael S. Michael, Are Migration Policies that Induce Skilled (Unskilled) Migration Beneficial (Harmful) for the Host Country?, September 2006
  92. 1815 Eytan Sheshinski, Optimum Commodity Taxation in Pooling Equilibria, October 2006 1816 Gottfried Haber and Reinhard Neck, Sustainability of Austrian Public Debt: A Political Economy Perspective, October 2006
  93. 1817 Thiess Buettner, Michael Overesch, Ulrich Schreiber and Georg Wamser, The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on Multinationals' Financing and Investment Decisions, October 2006
  94. 1818 Eric O'N. Fisher and Sharon L. May, Relativity in Trade Theory: Towards a Solution to the Mystery of Missing Trade, October 2006
  95. 1819 Junichi Minagawa and Thorsten Upmann, Labor Supply and the Demand for Child Care: An Intertemporal Approach, October 2006
  96. 1820 Jan K. Brueckner and Raquel Girvin, Airport Noise Regulation, Airline Service Quality, and Social Welfare, October 2006
  97. 1821 Sijbren Cnossen, Alcohol Taxation and Regulation in the European Union, October 2006 1822 Frederick van der Ploeg, Sustainable Social Spending in a Greying Economy with Stagnant Public Services: Baumol's Cost Disease Revisited, October 2006
  98. 1823 Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen and Charles van Marrewijk, Cross-Border Mergers & Acquisitions: The Facts as a Guide for International Economics, October 2006 1824 J. Atsu Amegashie, A Psychological Game with Interdependent Preference Types, October 2006
  99. 1825 Kurt R. Brekke, Ingrid Koenigbauer and Odd Rune Straume, Reference Pricing of Pharmaceuticals, October 2006
  100. 1826 Sean Holly, M. Hashem Pesaran and Takashi Yamagata, A Spatio-Temporal Model of House Prices in the US, October 2006
  101. 1827 Margarita Katsimi and Thomas Moutos, Inequality and the US Import Demand Function, October 2006

Related papers

Inequality and the import demand function
Thomas Moutos

Oxford Economic Papers, 2012

In this paper we build a model of trade in vertically differentiated products and find that income inequality can affect the demand for imports even in the presence of homothetic preferences. The empirical importance of changes in inequality on the demand for imports is then assessed by examining panel data for 36 developing and developed countries for the 1980-1997 period. We find significant evidence supporting our prediction that inequality has a large influence on the demand for imports. Moreover we find that, in line with the predictions of our theoretical model, this influence is positive for high-income countries (countries that produce the high quality variety of the vertically differentiated product) and negative for low-income countries (countries that produce the low quality variety of the vertically differentiated product).

View PDFchevron_right
The Impact of International Trade on Income Inequality in the United States since 1970's
Andoni Fornio

EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, 2017

This research analyzes the impact of openness to trade on the level of income inequality in the United States. Using time series data of periods between 1970 and 2014, this study found that trade increases income inequality. It is also found that an increase in trade volume leads to a wider income gap as more income goes to the top 10% wealthiest people in the United States. When elaborating trade into export side and import side, it is found that both of them significantly contribute to a higher income inequality when it is measured by GINI. However, it is only the import side that contributes to the increase in the income share of the top 10%. This study also found that there is a negligible effect of FDI inflow on income inequality in the United States.

View PDFchevron_right
Inequality and trade
Devashish Mitra

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d&apos;<html_ent glyph="@eacute;" ascii="e"/>conomique, 2005

We incorporate demand-side considerations in trade in a systematic but straightforward way. We do so by focusing on the role of inequality in the determination of trade flows and patterns. With nonhomothetic preferences, when countries are similar in all respects but asset inequality, we find that trade is driven by specialization in consumption, not production. These assumptions allow us to generate some interesting international spillover effects of redistributive policies. We also look at the effects of combining inequality and endowment differences on trade flows, and see that this has implications for "the mystery of the missing trade." We then study a model of monopolistic competition, and find a novel V-shaped relationship between the ratio of inter-industry to intraindustry trade and a country's inequality. Finally, we look at how international differences in factor endowments affect this relationship between the ratio of inter-to-intra-industry trade and inequality. Our theory formalizes as well as modifies Linder's conjecture about the relationship between intraindustry trade and the extent of similarity between trading partners.

View PDFchevron_right
Identify Factors Affecting the Imports of Consumption Goods, with an Emphasis on Income Inequality (1969-2010)
Abolfazl shahabadi

2015

In the current structure of world economy, import plays an important role in the economic development strategy. This is one of the effective factors on economic growth on the one hand and it is an important item of the country&#39;s balance of payments on the other hand. Thus a change that occurs in the import of country would affect on the country&#39;s development process. So Suitable policies are important for imports, But choosing the correct strategy for import depends on consider of factors affecting it. So, one of the major issues in the field of import of goods is identify of factors affecting on imports. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is identify factors affecting the imports of consumption goods during the period 1969-2010 in Iran. This study assessed the effects of factors such as gross domestic product, relative price, income inequality and total factor productivity on Iranian imports of consumption goods. Based on the findings, there was a positive relationship be...

View PDFchevron_right
Income Inequality and International Trade: Empirical Evidence based on New Panel Data Sets
Sylvain Petit

staffs.ac.uk

The purpose of this paper is to empirically study the link between inequalities and international trade (notably of services), by using new panel data. We use a long term panel data set from the CHELEM (CEPII), Top Incomes Shares, and IFS (International financial statistics) databases, for nine developed countries. We propose two alternative methods to explain inequalities due to international trade. The first one is a dynamic model and the second is based on the method of panel cointegration. For every empirical method, we check if the link between inequalities and trade of services has the same significance as between trade of manufactured goods and inequalities. Finally, we decompose the trade of services in three categories: tourism, transport and others commercial services, to analyze this link.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Economics
  • Econometrics
  • Applied Economics
  • Social Science Research Network
  • Money and Finance
  • Finance and Investment Banking
  • consumption sociology
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved