Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Transfer Learning for Tilt-Dependent Radio Map Prediction

2020, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking

https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2020.2964761

Abstract

Machine learning will play a major role in handling 1 the complexity of future mobile wireless networks by improving 2 network management and orchestration capabilities. Due to the 3 large number of parameters that can be monitored and config-4 ured in the network, collecting and processing high volumes of 5 data is often unfeasible or too expensive at network runtime, 6 which calls for taking resource management and service orches-7 tration decisions with only a partial view of the network status. 8 Motivated by this fact, this paper proposes a transfer learning 9 framework for reconstructing the radio map corresponding to a 10 target antenna tilt configuration by transferring the knowledge 11 acquired from another tilt configuration of the same antenna, 12 when no or very limited measurements are available from the 13 target. The performance of the framework is validated against 14 standard machine learning techniques on a data set collected 15 from a 4G commercial base stations. In most of the tested scenar-16 ios, the proposed framework achieves notable prediction accuracy 17 with respect to classical machine learning approaches, with a 18 mean absolute percentage error below 8%. 19 Index Terms-Radio map prediction, antenna tilt, transfer 20 learning. 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 F IFTH generation wireless networks (5G) are expected to 23 improve the performance of cellular systems, achieving 24 higher data rates, reduced latency, higher reliability and sup-25 port for greater numbers of users. To achieve this, 5G resorts 26 to dense and heterogeneous deployments, coupled with higher 27 flexibility in the network access and core domains, which can 28 be dynamically managed in either a centralized or distributed 29 manner. To cope with such a complex scenario, it is foreseen 30 that machine learning tools will play a major role in enabling 31

References (53)

  1. C. Parera, A. E. C. Redondi, M. Cesana, Q. Liao, L. Ewe, and C. Tatino, "Transferring knowledge for tilt-dependent radio map prediction," in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), 2018, pp. 1-6.
  2. C. Jiang, H. Zhang, Y. Ren, Z. Han, K.-C. Chen, and L. Hanzo, "Machine learning paradigms for next-generation wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 98-105, Apr. 2017.
  3. M. Danneberg, J. Holfeld, M. Grieger, M. Amro, and G. Fettweis, "Field trial evaluation of UE specific antenna downtilt in an LTE down- link," in Proc. IEEE Int. ITG Workshop Smart Antennas (WSA), 2012, pp. 274-280.
  4. S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, "A survey on transfer learning," IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345-1359, Oct. 2010.
  5. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, "BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding," in Proc. Conf. North Amer. Ch. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Human Lang. Technol., 2019, pp. 4171-4186.
  6. J. Howard and S. Ruder, "Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification," in Proc. 56th Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguist., 2018, pp. 328-339.
  7. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING
  8. J. Moysen, L. Giupponi, and J. Mangues-Bafalluy, "A mobile network 1005 planning tool based on data analytics," Mobile Inf. Syst., vol. 2017, 1006 Nov. 2017, Art. no. 6740585.
  9. H. C. Nguyen et al., "Validation of tilt gain under realistic path loss 1008 model and network scenario," in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC), 1009 2013, pp. 1-5.
  10. C. Phillips, D. Sicker, and D. Grunwald, "A survey of wireless path 1011 loss prediction and coverage mapping methods," IEEE Commun. Surveys 1012 Tuts., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 255-270, 1st Quart., 2013. 1013
  11. I. Rodriguez et al., "A geometrical-based vertical gain correction for 1014 signal strength prediction of downtilted base station antennas in urban 1015 areas," in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC), 2012, pp. 1-5.
  12. D. W. Kifle, B. Wegmann, I. Viering, and A. Klein, "Impact of antenna 1017 tilting on propagation shadowing model," in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol.
  13. 1018 Conf. (VTC), 2013, pp. 1-5.
  14. 1019 [12] "Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); Further advance- 1020 ments for (E-UTRA) physical layer aspects," 3GPP, Sophia Antipolis, 1021 France, Rep. TR 36.814, 2006.
  15. K. Weiss, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D. Wang, "A survey of transfer 1023 learning," J. Big Data, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 9, 2016. 1024
  16. M. E. Taylor and P. Stone, "Transfer learning for reinforcement learning 1025 domains: A survey," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1633-1685, 1026 2009. 1027
  17. J. Jiang and C. Zhai, "Instance weighting for domain adaptation in 1028 NLP," in Proc. 45th Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguist., 2007, 1029 pp. 264-271.
  18. R. Chattopadhyay, Q. Sun, W. Fan, I. Davidson, S. Panchanathan, and 1031 J. Ye, "Multisource domain adaptation and its application to early detec- 1032 tion of fatigue," ACM Trans. Knowl. Disc. Data, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 18, 1033 2012. 1034
  19. L. Duan, D. Xu, and I. W.-H. Tsang, "Domain adaptation from multiple 1035 sources: A domain-dependent regularization approach," IEEE Trans.
  20. 1036 Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 504-518, Mar. 2012. 1037
  21. S.-I. Lee, V. Chatalbashev, D. Vickrey, and D. Koller, "Learning a meta- 1038 level prior for feature relevance from multiple related tasks," in Proc. 1039 ACM 24th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2007, pp. 489-496.
  22. M. Long, J. Wang, G. Ding, S. J. Pan, and S. Y. Philip, "Adaptation 1041 regularization: A general framework for transfer learning," IEEE Trans. 1042 Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1076-1089, May 2014. 1043
  23. J. Gao, W. Fan, J. Jiang, and J. Han, "Knowledge transfer via multiple 1044 model local structure mapping," in Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. 1045 Knowl. Disc. Data Mining, 2008, pp. 283-291.
  24. T. Tommasi, F. Orabona, and B. Caputo, "Learning categories from few 1047 examples with multi model knowledge transfer," IEEE Trans. Pattern 1048 Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 928-941, May 2014.
  25. L. Mihalkova, T. Huynh, and R. J. Mooney, "Mapping and revising 1050 Markov logic networks for transfer learning," in Proc. AAAI 22nd Nat. 1051 Conf. Artif. Intell., 2007, pp. 608-614.
  26. J. Davis and P. Domingos, "Deep transfer via second-order Markov 1053 logic," in Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2009, pp. 217-224. 1054
  27. M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic, "Learning and transferring 1055 mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks," in 1056 Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2014, pp. 1717-1724.
  28. D. C. Cireşan, U. Meier, and J. Schmidhuber, "Transfer learning for 1058 Latin and Chinese characters with deep neural networks," in Proc. IEEE 1059 Int. Joint Conf. Neur. Netw. (IJCNN), 2012, pp. 1-6.
  29. M. Chen, U. Challita, W. Saad, C. Yin, and M. Debbah, "Artificial neu- 1061 ral networks-based machine learning for wireless networks: A tutorial," 1062 IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3039-3071, 4th Quart., 1063 2019. 1064
  30. S. J. Pan, J. T. Kwok, Q. Yang, and J. J. Pan, "Adaptive localization in a 1065 dynamic WiFi environment through multi-view learning," in Proc. 22nd
  31. 1066 Nat. Conf. Artif. Intell., 2007, pp. 1108-1113.
  32. V. W. Zheng, S. J. Pan, Q. Yang, and J. J. Pan, "Transferring multi- 1068 device localization models using latent multi-task learning," in Proc. 1069 AAAI, vol. 8, 2008, pp. 1427-1432.
  33. S. J. Pan, D. Shen, Q. Yang, and J. T. Kwok, "Transferring localiza- 1071 tion models across space," in Proc. 23rd Nat. Conf. Artif. Intell., 2008, 1072 pp. 1383-1388.
  34. J. Pan, "Feature-based transfer learning with real-world applications," 1074 Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Comput. Sci. Eng., Hong Kong Univ. Sci. 1075 Technol., Hong Kong, 2010.
  35. E. Baştug, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, "A transfer learning approach 1077 for cache-enabled wireless networks," in Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Model.
  36. 1078 Optim. Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Netw. (WiOpt), 2015, pp. 161-166.
  37. A. Galindo-Serrano, L. Giupponi, and G. Auer, "Distributed learning in multiuser OFDMA femtocell networks," in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC), 2011, pp. 1-6.
  38. W. Wang, J. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, "Transfer learning based diagnosis for configuration troubleshooting in self-organizing femtocell networks," in Proc. IEEE Glob. Telecommun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), 2011, pp. 1-5.
  39. M. Chen, W. Saad, C. Yin, and M. Debbah, "Data correlation-aware resource management in wireless virtual reality (VR): An echo state transfer learning approach," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4267-4280, Jun. 2019.
  40. Z. Tang, D. Wang, and Z. Zhang, "Recurrent neural network training with dark knowledge transfer," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), 2016, pp. 5900-5904.
  41. E. U. T. R. Access, "Physical layer-measurements (3gpp ts 36.214 version 9.0. 0 release 9)," Standard ETSI TS 136 214, 2010.
  42. F. Afroz, R. Subramanian, R. Heidary, K. Sandrasegaran, and S. Ahmed, "SINR, RSRP, RSSI and RSRQ measurements in long term evolution networks," Int. J. Wireless Mobile Netw., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 113-123, 2015.
  43. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, Deep Learning, vol. 1. Cambridge, U.K.: MIT Press, 2016.
  44. J. Snoek, H. Larochelle, and R. P. Adams, "Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms," in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Neur. Inf. Process. Sys., 2012, pp. 2951-2959.
  45. J. Bergstra and Y. Bengio, "Random search for hyper-parameter optimization," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 281-305, 2012.
  46. F. Chollet et al., (2015). Keras. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/fchollet/keras
  47. M. Abadi et al., "Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learn- ing," in Proc. 12th USENIX Conf. Oper. Syst. Design Implement., 2016, pp. 265-283.
  48. T. Cover and P. Hart, "Nearest neighbor pattern classification," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. IT-13, no. 1, pp. 21-27, Jan. 1967.
  49. T. K. Ho, "Random decision forests," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Document Anal. Recognit., 1995, pp. 278-282.
  50. A. Liaw and M. Wiener, "Classification and regression by randomforest," R News, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 18-22, 2002.
  51. L. Breiman, "Random forests," Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001.
  52. J. M. Joyce, "Kullback-Leibler divergence," in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2011, pp. 720-722.
  53. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks," in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Neur. Inf. Process. Syst., 2012, pp. 1097-1105.