Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

An empirical evaluation of ontology-based semantic annotators

2013, Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture

https://doi.org/10.1145/2479832.2479855

Abstract

One of the most important prerequisites for achieving the Semantic Web vision is semantic annotation of data/resources. Semantic annotation enriches unstructured and/or semistructured content with a context that is further linked to the structured domain-specific knowledge. In particular, ontologybased semantic annotators enable the selection of a specific ontology to annotate content. This paper presents results of an empirical study of recent ontology-based annotators, namely Stanbol, KIM, and SDArch. Specifically, we evaluated the robustness of these annotators with respect to specific features of ontology concepts such as the length of concepts' labels and their linguistic categories (e.g., prepositions and conjunctions). Our results show that although significantly correlated according to most of the conducted evaluations, tools still exhibit their unique features that could be a topic of new research.

References (5)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Andrews, P., Zaihrayeu, I., & Pane, J. (2012). A Classification of Semantic Annotation Systems. Semantic Web Journal, in press.
  3. Maynard, D. (2008). Benchmarking Textual Annotation Tools for the Semantic Web. Proc. of the 6h Int'l Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), (pp. 20- 25).
  4. Reeve, L., & Han, H. (2005). Survey of Semantic Annotation Platforms. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.
  5. Uren, V., Cimiano, P., Iria, J., Handschuh, S., Vargas- Vera, M., Motta, E., & Ciravegna, S. (2005). Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art . Journal of Web Semantics. Van Harmelen, F. (2000). The Semantic Web: the Roles of XML. IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 15, No. 3, 63-74.