Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

General Reggeon Vertex in Dual Theory

1971, Progress of Theoretical Physics

https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.46.1192

Abstract

On the basis of Fubini and Veneziano's manifestly dual symmetric operator expression for a dual amplitude, we perform multiple-factorization of dual amplitude in Shapiro's general factorization scheme. In contrast with other works, our method of multiple-factorization is completely symmetric with respect to Reggeon legs. A new general form of Reggeon vertex is obtained, which includes Lovelace's vertex as a particular limiting case, and Olive's one as a special case. Our general Reggeon vertex has simple gauge and twisting transformation properties. The duality relation is satisfied with the KSV change of propagator variables, as an identity of, integrands. *> This is Alessandrini et al.'s canonical form.W **> t means transpose. This relation follows from the fact that the matrices X

References (16)

  1. K. Kikkawa, B. Sakita and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969), 1701. K. Kikkawa, S. A. Klein, B. Sakita and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970), 3258.
  2. S. Sciuto, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 2 (1969), 411.
  3. G. Carborne and S. Sciuto, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 3 (1970), 246.
  4. M. Kosterlitz and D. A. Wray, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 3 (1970), 491.
  5. L. Yu, Phys. Rev. Dl (1970), 1010, 2256.
  6. L. Caneshi, A. Schwimmer and G. Veneziano, Phys. Letters 30B (1969), 356. L. Caneshi and A. Schwimmer, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 3 (1970), 213. F. Guerin, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 2 (1970), 895.
  7. M. Ida, H. Matsumoto and S. Y azaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 (1970), 456. See also: D. ]. Gross and ].
  8. H. Schwartz, Nucl. Phys. B23 (1970), 333.
  9. S. Fubini and G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cim. 67A (1970), 29.
  10. A. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Dl (1970), 3371.
  11. C. Lovelace, Phys. Letters 32B (1970), 490.
  12. D. I. Olive, preprint DAMTP 70/33.
  13. See e.g. A. 0. Barut and C. Fronsdal, Proc. Roy. Soc. A287 (1965), 532. See also : L. Clavelli and P. Ramond, Phys. Rev. D2 (1970), 973.
  14. V. Alessandrini, D. Amati, M. LeBellac and D. Olive, CERN preprint, TH-1160; Phys. Letters 32B (1970) , 285.
  15. D. Amati, M. LeBellac and D. Olive, Nuovo Cim. 66A (1970), 831.
  16. E. Donini and S. Sciuto, Ann. of Phys. 58 (1970), 388. Note added in proof: For finite e, Eq. (2•5) is not mathematically correct definition. Precisely speaking, it should be understood as the limit e-70 of the equation co { (az+ {j) (r+8/z)} -• (P(z) I ±n) = 21 R~~ (zl ±m).