Vanderbilt University
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology
Since mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis of dopaminergic neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease, we determined the expression of genes related to mitochondrial function in the substantia nigra of mice... more
Although both amphiregulin and TGF-α are known to exert their effects through the EGF receptor, we find that concentrations of recombinant human amphiregulin and TGF-α that are equipotent in EGF receptor activation and mitogenesis exhibit... more
Activating mutations of the RAS family of small GTPases are among the most common genetic events in human tumorigenesis. Constitutive activation of the three canonical family members, KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS segregate strongly by tissue... more
Both transcriptional subtype and signaling network analyses have proved useful in cancer genomics research. However, these two approaches are usually applied in isolation in existing studies. We reason that deciphering genomic alterations... more
Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker important for epithelial homeostasis. However, the position of the Lrig1 + population in the intestinal crypt has been debated, largely due to discrepant staining patterns using two Lrig1... more
Mutant KRAS colorectal cancer (CRC) cells release protein-laden exosomes that can alter the tumor microenvironment. To test whether exosomal RNAs also contribute to changes in gene expression in recipient cells, and whether mutant KRAS... more
The NIH Extracellular RNA Communication Program's initiative on clinical utility of extracellular RNAs and therapeutic agents and developing scalable technologies is reviewed here. Background information and details of the projects... more
Composition and behavior of mutant KRAS exosomes 2 Abbreviations Amphiregulin (AREG), colorectal cancer (CRC), coefficient of variation (CV), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), false discovery rate (FDR), multiple reaction... more
instructed to select ≥1 diagnosis for each vignette. Results: 1) Total diagnostic agreement between all G was 2/20 vignettes, none among all F. IR percentage of agreement coefficient per case was >50% in only 7/20 vignettes (G) and 6/20... more