This essay examines the intense flow and re-flow of transnational migrants between Venezuela and Colombia, applying the theory suggested by Thomas Nail in his work the Figure of the Migrant. We initially focus on the regimes of social...
moreThis essay examines the intense flow and re-flow of transnational migrants between Venezuela and Colombia, applying the theory suggested by Thomas Nail in his work the Figure of the Migrant. We initially focus on the regimes of social motion, and how they link with the political figures of migrants and the strategies of expulsion. Then, we consider the demographic contribution of Colombian diaspora in Venezuela and the socio-political repercussion of their current migratory crisis reverse movement. In pursuing the latter goal, we use primary sources like interviews and discuss censuses and surveys from both countries. We concluded that the current migratory flood is shaped by decades of Colombian immigration to Venezuela and the much quoted exodus is part of a new Cold War narrative. Keywords: Colombian diaspora; politics of movement; proletarian; figures of migrants; surplus motion the United States. However, a second wave of immigrants from Venezuela started to arrive from 2015. This new wave had two characteristics, most were underclass workers, and many were descendants of Colombians and returnees. They were the outcome of decades of Colombians migration to Venezuela. In this way to understand this new migratory flow, Colombians, who emigrated to Venezuela and their social condition matters. This work explores a large scale contemporary population movement in a south to south corridor under the lights of techniques of social expulsion and the migrant figures. Figures that emerged from the historical evolution of social orders. I use for that purpose the method and the United States-Mexican case discussed by Thomas Nail in his book The Figure of the Migrant (2015), supplemented with archival sources, ethnographic material like interview, and an analysis on the limits of migratory statistics. The aim of the essay is not to explain the causes of migration but a portrayal of its social conditions and its contemporary hybridity and political complexity. In the first section of the paper, I discuss the political regimes of social motion in both countries and how they induce the flow population and the figures of the migrants associated. Then the essay examines the substantial demographic contribution of Colombians to the population growth of Venezuela. The last segment is an alternative view to the current migration crisis narrative, remarkably influenced by the cold war nature of the clash between Venezuela and the United States and its regional allies. I suggest to look at this flood mostly as a reverse immigration of Colombian families hurt by the economic crisis, and under pressure to leave the country. As a final point, we consider this reverse movement as a kinetic problem involving the last strategy of extensive expulsion: denationalization. From this perspective, the current migratory movement is shaped by Colombian immigration to Venezuela. I gathered material from twenty-one structured interviews to understand the migrant's perspective on various topics like family origins, the decision to come to Colombia, relations with the local bureaucracy, work opportunities, and opinions on Colombian society. Sixteen of these were Colombians, including nine women, of first and second generation, most with Venezuelan passports. The rest were Venezuelans and Italians. I have used my own experience as an immigrant and obtained great help from intense debates , conversations and unstructured interviews with dozens of my Colombian students, colleagues, friends, and people coming from Venezuela I meet on the streets of Bogotá 1. Annania, a civil servant in Venezuela, help me to get the important view from the other side of the hill. Most participants received a pseudonymous to protect them from unexpected repercussions. Long conversations with Italian parents, from my daughter Italian school, allowed me an enriched picture of foreign migrant opinions on Colombian society. I took many notes from these encounters and selected numerous newspaper articles relevant for this research. Politics of movement, petroleum, and the figure of the Colombian migrant The political theory of the migrant suggests a historical perspective that regards migrants subsumed by the evolution of political modes and subordinated to social motion defined by expansion and expulsion. The theory of expansion by expulsion radicalizes and broadens Marx's concept of primitive accumulation since Marx's concept is related with the prior historical age before the rise of capitalism. Nail work unwrapped new angles for studying migrations as the politics of movement or kinopolitics, and as a condition for social orders expansion. The theory emphasizes how different social regimes of accumulation since ancient times, and not only capitalism, bring into play four strategies of social expulsion: territorial, political, juridical, and economic. Each strategy is associated to a kinopower (centripetal, centrifugal, tensional and elastic forces), defined as the mode of circulation. The combinations of social expulsion strategies and mode of circulations produce four categories of migrants: nomad, barbarian, vagabond and proletarian. These figures are denied of their social status (expulsion) to develop new forms of social motion (expansion). These devices of a territorial, political, juridical, and economic expulsion continue to coexist and regulate contemporary migratory processes. The notion of expansion by extensive expulsion is that which matters the most for our analysis. Nail describes three different ways in which such movements take place: penal transportation, as those carried out in the eighteenth century from Great Britain to her colonies; The emigration of the relative surplus of the population when the economy reaches a critical juncture, and the denationalization of returned migrants or the annulment of their citizenship rights. Therefore, the population flows in the Colombian-Venezuelan migratory corridor may be illustrated by considering the political regimes of social motions in both countries, along with the strategies of expulsion and the migrant figures they produce. Colombia has been, during great part of the twentieth century, a booty capitalist economy. Weber outlined booty capitalism as a manner of acquiring wealth and riches by the way of war, plunder, and speculative adventures (Parkin 2002). Many characteristics of this type of capitalism are to be found in the Colombia economy, like the large concentration,-through war and displacement-of land in few hands. In the cocaine production that gave rise to a powerful narcobourgeoisie integrated into the legal economy and institutions (Richani 2013) and that in the words of Arias Felipe (2019) is a "macroeconomic stabilizer". A country locked in a vicious war over the control and commodification of land and governed indirectly as a European colonial empire (Robinson 2013). The national political elite, living particularly in the capital Bogotá, have left vast geographical spaces, in exchange for its power and stability, in the hand of provincial elites associated with non-state armed groups (paramilitaries and drug trafficking bands). Rural and frontier regions of Colombia live in a perpetual low-intensity armed conflict (Hristov 2014). This indirect form of rule produces chaos and expansive expulsion of social motion. The Colombian kinopolitics order displays an embedded tendency to expel the population to preserve political stability, shelter the power elites from social unrest and promote economic wealth concentration and capital accumulation by dispossession (Glassman 2006). As Koessl, using Bourdieu's sociological categories, states: (...)The opening argument of the analysis is that the structure of the field is preserved in Colombia thanks to an inherent violence that comes from the beginning of the 20th century. This violence, assimilated into the habitus of the Colombian social agents, differs from other cases in Latin America. In Colombia, violence is part of history and, therefore, an accepted praxis for the solution of conflicts that allows to overcome the barriers to system reproduction. (Koessl, 54) Population displacements from their land and means of production began during the era known as La Violencia (1948-1961). Forced migration reached the astounding number of 2 million persons out of a population of 11 million, expanding the production frontier of cash crops by reducing subsistence peasant agriculture. The development of a neoliberal extractive economy (expansion) in the last two decades, such as oil, coal mining, biofuels and extensive livestock led to a new cycle of dispossession and forced displacement, with the expropriation of lands of peasant communities, and minority groups like natives and Afro-descendant populations. It deprived all these folks of their social status (expulsion), means of productions and political rights, criminalizing them or restricting their access to work through unemployment. A structural surplus of social motion is produced by continuous enclosures (Ruiz Ruiz and Santana Riva 2016; Hough 2007). This surplus either moves to Colombian urban centers swelling the informal economy or leaves (emigrates) the country. The unit of victims of the Colombian government registers 7,364,964 persons forcefully displaced (data from the Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas), from 1999 to 2015. The extractive economy, during that time, thrived and an amalgam of nonstate armed groups (paramilitaries), local and national elites, and transnational capital seized and concentrated from 8 to 10 million hectares of good quality land. The political economy that guides all these actors was argued with a contemporary wit by Marx in a letter to Sigfrid Meyer and August Vogt, when Marx wrote: "in reducing the Irish population by eviction and forcible emigration, to such a small number that English capital (capital invested in land leased for...