Psychologie

Report Length 1,500 words (not including references and appendices) Harvard referencing required. To be uploaded at Turnitin on week 7 (check exact date on syllabus) Project description: Students are to work individually and prepare a report on a successful new product launch in the European or North American market. It can be a physical product or a service. It can be a completely new product or service or a re-launched one, which however entails a significant element of "newness" for the customer. It is important that product launch takes place in the context of the digital environment. In order to achieve that they will need to conduct a literature review on key success factors of new product launches and use that as the basis for their product choice. This assignment is designed to develop and assess students' understanding of the key success factors and key challenges related to new product launches in developed economies and stagnated markets in the context of the digital world. The issues to be discussed are: key success factors for the industry, competitive advantage, target market, positioning, product strategy, pricing strategy, communication strategy and distribution strategy. Through this assignment students will achieve the following learning objectives: a) Develop their analytical skills. b) Develop and demonstrate their ability to conduct academic research. c) Develop and demonstrate their ability to write business reports. d) Develop an in depth understanding of the fundamental marketing theories. Project outline: Students can choose the outline that they believe better serves their analysis. However, in the context of that, the following questions need to be answered: • The market, size, growth rate, macro environmental trends and their effect on the success of the product. • Competitive analysis. Define the industry in which the product competes. Discuss industry profitability and growth potential. Discuss direct and indirect competitors and needs they satisfy.

FAQ Capitalisme Cognitif:

Le Capital cognitif d'un pays, mesuré par son QI moyen ou le niveau de QI de son top 5%, est le principal facteur de sa réussite tant en termes de richesse (PIB) que de santé et d'agrément de vie. Il ne s'agit bien sûr pas du seul facteur influent, mais il offre l'avantage d'être quantifiable et d'être corrélé avec d'autres critères considérés comme positifs. En d'autres termes : quel que soit votre QI individuel, le QI moyen de votre lieu de résidence a un impact déterminant sur la vie que vous pourrez mener.

This is a message for you, human of the future. As of receiving this message, you may have been allowing a third party to modify the genes that you passed on to your own children, to our descendants. I am here to tell you that you have chosen the wrong path for our species. The goal of this text is to help you understand the errors that were committed along the way. All of these errors could have been readily foreseen and avoided. This text, written in the Year 2023, before the events that it describes would happen, stands as proof of that. It may not be too late for you to reverse course. Your immediate action may be crucial in ensuring the continuation of human existence. Genetically editing children at the moment of conception may have seemed obvious and normal to you, your friends or your ancestors. Perhaps your parents and grandparents all went through the process before conceiving any children they had, including you. Plenty of social incentives must exist in your world that would pressure you into taking this path. Encouragements may have come from your friends, family or doctors. Some monetary incentives, as well as social and financial ones, may even exist that would push you toward genetic modifications in your world. These outside pressures are, however, only the tip of the iceberg. The case for genetically modifying your children also relies on support located deep inside of you.

Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that there could be an artificial superintelligence in the future that, while otherwise benevolent, would punish anyone who knew of its potential existence but did not directly contribute to its advancement or development, in order to incentivize said advancement.