The paper addresses the problem of the legitimacy of authority. The author analyzed the role of t... more The paper addresses the problem of the legitimacy of authority. The author analyzed the role of the collective unconscious archetypes in the legitimization of power faction through the reference to the satisfaction of the need for security. Reliance on the models of the archetypes of corporate nature and hierarchy gives the possibility to show the impact of in-depth structures of the unconscious on the formation of power relations within socio-cultural communities. It has been shown that the archetype of corporate nature maintains the group identity as separated from the World entirety. The archetype hierarchy establishes a framework for vertical and horizontal intra-group stratification, which provides an effective functioning of communion in satisfying both common and individual needs. Corporate tendencies, at that, produce the perceptions of individuals organizing themselves in a collective as principally equal 'the same as me-self selves" in a situation of confrontation with the World, structurally similar for each of them. Hierarchical tendencies predispose the fundamentally unequal distribution of rights and obligations of people belonging to this communion. Thus, the interaction of the corporate nature and hierarchy archetypes creates a dialectical tension between a ruling faction and their subordinate community members. The resolution of the highlighted controversy occurs through recourse to the need for security. The consorted influence of the archetypes under discussion supports the priority of collective interests over individual ones, restricting the former by the necessity to satisfy the latter to the full extent possible. Keywords: legitimacy, the archetype of hierarchy, the need for security, the archetype of corporate nature, power.
Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series, 2019
C.G. Jung defined the concept of a collective unconsciousness (CU). Fundamentally, Jungian archet... more C.G. Jung defined the concept of a collective unconsciousness (CU). Fundamentally, Jungian archetypes of the unconscious may be understood as quantum electrodynamic (QED) patterns that exist at deep levels of human individual and collective psyche. Unlike the concepts of Sigmund Freud, comparative research demonstrates that Jungian dream therapy-which is based on archetypal dynamics-accords with the most recent research in the field of neurolinguistics. Archetypal dynamics of the collective unconsciousness have direct applicability to research on sentience in a quantum electrodynamic field according to quantum field theory (QFT). Increasingly in today's science that which has been considered unconscious must be understood as "sentient." Before Freud and Jung, science did not contemplate the unconscious because a "nullity" cannot be measured.
Вестник Томского государственного университета, Jun 1, 2020
Поднимается вопрос о роли не вполне осознаваемых оснований познания в процессе разворачивания мас... more Поднимается вопрос о роли не вполне осознаваемых оснований познания в процессе разворачивания массового сознания и коллективного поведения. Для анализа социальных феноменов предлагается использовать концепции априорного знания, эпистемы и архетипов. Выделяются сходства и отличия концепций кантианского априорного знания, фукодианской эпистемы и юнгианских архетипов.
International journal of recent technology and engineering, Jul 30, 2019
The article deals with the modern order (world order) in the context of modern social reality. Th... more The article deals with the modern order (world order) in the context of modern social reality. This is due to the need to identify and diagnose the current socio-cultural situation in the world. It is suggested that modern social and socio-political orders, as well as world order patterns and mechanisms, are unable to reproduce the value identity of societies. This is partly due to the disruption of the "super doctrines", "pictures of the world", which for many centuries held social identity around a common substantive core, namely, national, religious, or political ideology. The article also discusses the role of individuals in the course of social reproduction, as well as presents general arguments about the increasing role of the human factor and the need for more efficient use of human capital.
Žurnal Sibirskogo federalʹnogo universiteta, Nov 1, 2015
In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a... more In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a group community is considered. The authors point out some emerging contradictions in this process.
Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies, 2019
C.G. Jung defined the concept of a collective unconsciousness (CU). Fundamentally, Jungian archet... more C.G. Jung defined the concept of a collective unconsciousness (CU). Fundamentally, Jungian archetypes of the unconscious may be understood as quantum electrodynamic (QED) patterns that exist at deep levels of human individual and collective psyche. Unlike the concepts of Sigmund Freud, comparative research demonstrates that Jungian dream therapy—which is based on archetypal dynamics—accords with the most recent research in the field of neurolinguistics. Archetypal dynamics of the collective unconsciousness have direct applicability to research on sentience in a quantum electrodynamic field according to quantum field theory (QFT). Increasingly in today's science that which has been considered unconscious must be understood as “sentient.” Before Freud and Jung, science did not contemplate the unconscious because a “nullity” cannot be measured.
In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a... more In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a group community is considered. The authors point out some emerging contradictions in this processВ статье рассматривается взаимодействие архетипов корпоративности и иерархии в процессе становления групповой общности. Исследуются возникающие в этом процессе противоречи
The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives... more The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives a detailed view on the issue of death as a social phenomenon in the cultural and historical context. Its second part provides with the results of sociological study of Siberian Federal University students’ opinion. Analysis of the obtained data made it possible to distinguish 2 significantly different aspects of the attitude to death. The authors conclude that the strategy of death avoidance dominates at the level of surface consciousness whereas the strategy of collective ritual caused by existential experiences, on the contrary, dominates on a deeper level. The explanation for this ambivalence of the student mass consciousness undoubtedly requires further researchВ статье рассматриваются вопросы социального отношения к смерти и бессмертию. В первой части работы авторами подробно прорабатывается проблема смерти как социального феномена в культурно-историческом контексте. Во второй част...
Взаимодействие архетипов корпоративности и иерархии в процессе становления внутригрупповой общности
In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a... more In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a group community is considered. The authors point out some emerging contradictions in this processВ статье рассматривается взаимодействие архетипов корпоративности и иерархии в процессе становления групповой общности. Исследуются возникающие в этом процессе противоречи
The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives... more The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives a detailed view on the issue of death as a social phenomenon in the cultural and historical context. Its second part provides with the results of sociological study of Siberian Federal University students’ opinion. Analysis of the obtained data made it possible to distinguish 2 significantly different aspects of the attitude to death. The authors conclude that the strategy of death avoidance dominates at the level of surface consciousness whereas the strategy of collective ritual caused by existential experiences, on the contrary, dominates on a deeper level. The explanation for this ambivalence of the student mass consciousness undoubtedly requires further researchВ статье рассматриваются вопросы социального отношения к смерти и бессмертию. В первой части работы авторами подробно прорабатывается проблема смерти как социального феномена в культурно-историческом контексте. Во второй част...
Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015
In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a... more In this article the interaction of corporate and hierarchy archetypes in the process of forming a group community is considered. The authors point out some emerging contradictions in this process.
Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015
The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives... more The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives a detailed view on the issue of death as a social phenomenon in the cultural and historical context. Its second part provides with the results of sociological study of Siberian Federal University students' opinion. Analysis of the obtained data made it possible to distinguish 2 significantly different aspects of the attitude to death. The authors conclude that the strategy of death avoidance dominates at the level of surface consciousness whereas the strategy of collective ritual caused by existential experiences, on the contrary, dominates on a deeper level. The explanation for this ambivalence of the student mass consciousness undoubtedly requires further research.
In the formation of any group identity is enabled the collective unconscious program, transformin... more In the formation of any group identity is enabled the collective unconscious program, transforming the
archetypical image of "I and the World" in the archetypical image of "We and the World". This program,
embedded the individual Self in the Self group, we have called the archetype of corporativity. The current
globalization process can substantiate the same archetypical programs that worked before. The Western
world, as the subject of its globalization project, in full compliance with the archetypical program of
corporativity seeks to make its own We-Self in the "universal-all-of-us-Self". If any we-group doesn’t fit in
all the world's leading standards, it should be "civilize". And as long as it will not be "tightened" to the
appropriate standards its members should be regarded still-not-quite-human. Corporativity archetype is
involved in any Globalization project, with dialectically contradictory manner. On the one hand, it provides
the possibility of its supporters existential experience of belonging to a potentially very powerful universal
Self. On the other hand, the program starts the archetypical mechanisms bias - positive to "ours" negative
and even hostile to the "others". We can assume that overcoming the contradictions generated by the
archetype of corporativity will promote through the popular at the moment project of humanity unification
into a single entity in the face of the so-called global threats. However, the implementation of this project is
possible only if the imperatives of the universal "we-self" will be stronger than the imperatives of its
constituent smaller selves, that would reliably block the work of the archetypical program "ours-others" on
the levels of the we-groups included in the humanity. And this is unlikely to happen before a global
catastrophe. Anyway, the solution to this problem is impossible without strengthening the cultural and
symbolic components in the bundle of collective rational and collective unconscious, which instrumentally
is rather formidable task.
The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives... more The article analyses the issues of social attitude to death and immortality. Its first part gives a detailed view on the issue of death as a social phenomenon in the cultural and historical context. Its second part provides with the results of sociological study of Siberian Federal University students’ opinion. Analysis of the obtained data made it possible to distinguish 2 significantly different aspects of the attitude to death. The authors conclude that the strategy of death avoidance dominates at the level of surface consciousness whereas the strategy of collective ritual caused by existential experiences, on the contrary, dominates on a deeper level. The explanation for this ambivalence of the student mass consciousness undoubtedly requires further research.
Uploads
Papers by Denis V Lvov
archetypical image of "I and the World" in the archetypical image of "We and the World". This program,
embedded the individual Self in the Self group, we have called the archetype of corporativity. The current
globalization process can substantiate the same archetypical programs that worked before. The Western
world, as the subject of its globalization project, in full compliance with the archetypical program of
corporativity seeks to make its own We-Self in the "universal-all-of-us-Self". If any we-group doesn’t fit in
all the world's leading standards, it should be "civilize". And as long as it will not be "tightened" to the
appropriate standards its members should be regarded still-not-quite-human. Corporativity archetype is
involved in any Globalization project, with dialectically contradictory manner. On the one hand, it provides
the possibility of its supporters existential experience of belonging to a potentially very powerful universal
Self. On the other hand, the program starts the archetypical mechanisms bias - positive to "ours" negative
and even hostile to the "others". We can assume that overcoming the contradictions generated by the
archetype of corporativity will promote through the popular at the moment project of humanity unification
into a single entity in the face of the so-called global threats. However, the implementation of this project is
possible only if the imperatives of the universal "we-self" will be stronger than the imperatives of its
constituent smaller selves, that would reliably block the work of the archetypical program "ours-others" on
the levels of the we-groups included in the humanity. And this is unlikely to happen before a global
catastrophe. Anyway, the solution to this problem is impossible without strengthening the cultural and
symbolic components in the bundle of collective rational and collective unconscious, which instrumentally
is rather formidable task.
view on the issue of death as a social phenomenon in the cultural and historical context. Its second
part provides with the results of sociological study of Siberian Federal University students’ opinion.
Analysis of the obtained data made it possible to distinguish 2 significantly different aspects of the
attitude to death. The authors conclude that the strategy of death avoidance dominates at the level of
surface consciousness whereas the strategy of collective ritual caused by existential experiences, on
the contrary, dominates on a deeper level. The explanation for this ambivalence of the student mass
consciousness undoubtedly requires further research.