Social Cognition and Artificial Agents.
Strasser A. (2018) Social Cognition and Artificial Agents. In: Müller, V. (ed.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017. PT-AI 2017. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (SAPERE), 44, 106-114, Berlin, Springer., 2018
Standard notions in philosophy of mind have a tendency to characterize socio-cognitive abilities ... more Standard notions in philosophy of mind have a tendency to characterize socio-cognitive abilities as if they were unique to sophisticated human beings. However, assuming that it is likely that we are soon going to share a large part of our social lives with various kinds of artificial agents, it is important to develop a conceptual framework providing notions that are able to account for various types of social agents. Recent minimal approaches to socio-cognitive abilities such as mindreading and commitment present a promising starting point from which one can expand the field of application not only to infants and non-human animals but also to artificial agents. Developing a minimal approach to the socio-cognitive ability of acting jointly, I present a foundation for future discussions about the question of how our conception of sociality can be expanded to artificial agents.
Uploads
Books by Anna Strasser
Zu diesem Zwecke wird in dieser Arbeit der programmatische Vorschlag einer Bedeutungstheorie von Donald Davidson vorgestellt. Dazu ist es notwendig, sich mit der Wahrheitstheorie Tarskis zu beschäftigen. Interessant ist nun, welche Erkenntnisse unabhängig von Tarski in dieser Bedeutungstheorie enthalten sind. Hier kann man zum einen die These der Unerforschlichkeit der Referenz und zum anderen das Prinzip der Nachsicht nennen.
Durch die Voraussetzung des Prinzips der Nachsicht, nämlich größtmögliche Übereinstimmung zwischen Interpret und Sprecher anzunehmen, ist es einem Interpreten möglich, in die Interdependenzbeziehung zwischen Überzeugung und Bedeutung einzudringen. So kann der radikale Interpret erste Interpretationshypothesen aufstellen, die er später mit einem bedeutungsholistischen Ansatz auf logische Konsistenz in bezug auf die faktische Menge aller seiner Interpretationshypothesen überprüfen kann."
Papers by Anna Strasser
To argue for this claim I will clarify the conditions that a possible participant of a collective action necessarily has to fulfill. In the case of collective actions, it is not primarily intentionality that matters, but social abilities that play a crucial role, since social cognition enables participants of a collective action to successfully interact.
I will argue that successful interaction requires that we are able to anticipate the behavior of others, and to coordinate with them. However, it may not require higher-order representational abilities - including joint attention, theory of mind and theory of emotion.
The behavior of artificial systems may be interpreted as if they are able to ‘read’ social hints and behave in such a way that we tend to treat them as if they had mental or even emotional states. This leads to cases of collective agency where it is at least extremely counter-intuitive to describe the participating artificial system as merely a tool. In this paper I will argue for a position showing that less demanding conditions like pure goal-directedness plus certain social and cognitive abilities may be sufficient to participate in a collective action.