This study explores the modern history of kundalini with an emphasis on its scientification. Concepts of kuṇḍalinī originated in South Asian tantra and yoga texts and practices and have undergone significant transformations since the late...
moreThis study explores the modern history of kundalini with an emphasis on its scientification. Concepts of kuṇḍalinī originated in South Asian tantra and yoga texts and practices and have undergone significant transformations since the late nineteenth century. Modernisation processes transformed the premodern South Asian views of kuṇḍalinī into modern kundalini concepts, which became a globally discussed topic of late twentieth-century religion. This transformation process can be divided into three chronological periods. The first period involved the initial interest of and interpretations by the Theosophical Society, Hindu reformers, and other South Asian intellectuals during the 1880s and early 1890s. The second period (c. 1896 to 1933) features influential South Asian writers and publication projects, such as Swami Vivekananda, Vasant Rele, and the works published under the name Arthur Avalon, which resulted from the collaboration of several South Asian tantra specialists and John Woodroffe. The third period, the focus of this study, spans from the late 1960s to the mid-1980s, marked by the international prominence of the South Asian author Gopi Krishna (1903–1984), whose book Kundalini: The Evolutionary Energy in Man (1967) catalysed kundalini’s modern heyday. Krishna was also significantly involved in elevating the importance of using empirical scientific methods to research kundalini during this period. This study emphasises the institutionalisation and international collaborations of empirical kundalini research during the third period. Gopi Krishna’s pivotal role in initiating and promoting empirical kundalini research through his international projects and collaborations forms the main case study. In addition to Gopi Krishna, the present study examines the involvement of (mainly) US-based institutes as historical examples of empirical kundalini research, such as the Kundalini Clinic and the Esalen Institute. As a concluding analysis, I assess kundalini’s relevance within the broader social, cultural, and religious processes of the 1970s and 1980s. I argue that kundalini’s significance extends beyond its immediate context, as it uniquely reflects developments in recent religious and cultural history. This study posits that kundalini became so popular because it functioned as a unifying symbol around which different currents of the era converged. The study of kundalini, therefore, facilitates a deeper understanding of the cultural landscape of the time.