Jump to content

Talk:Cheryl Hines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robert F. Kennedy's Politics

[edit]

Should a section be added about whether or hot she agrees with the damage her husband has done in his current role? Has she ever commented publicly about then likelihood that her husband will be responsible for millions of deaths due to all the valuable cancer and AIDS research he has ended, the vaccine contracts he has canceled, the lies he has peddled about vaccines, etc.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.253.76 (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Right now she is getting away with murder because she is being careful what she says on the media but her Smiling face is right behind him. 76.146.50.155 (talk) 01:11, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

[edit]

Just curious, why is her new marriage formatted as (2014-) while on the Tom Hanks page is (m. 1998) ? Is there not a standard for marriage date on Wikipedia? 173.172.23.214 (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue to consider is the mistaken idea that husband RFK, Jr., is the Secretary of HHS. As of this date (12/6/24, he has only been nominated for the post, not approved. Is some one jumping the gun out of an excess of enthusiasm? This may become corr5ect, but at this time it has to happened. Dr. Paul Bee (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was due to the format - fixed today.Lowerunit (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Somebody who is connected with Cheryl Hines is toning down her association with RFK Jr. She's been a driving force in portraying RFK Jr as a Normal person married man with a devoted wife and this person is removing important information about her and her r Anti-Vaxxing support.

Cheryl Hines importance today is her support of RFK Jr and his Anti-Vaxxer ideas. Her support or non-support of RFK jr is much more important today than any **Acting*** she has done. So anybody who is removing her Anti-Vax quotes is Whitewashing her misdeeds. She has made several quotes to the Press where she supports her Anti-Vax husband. She literally sat in back him for hours during his Confirmation Hearings. Nobody would care about her marriage as much if she did not have RFK Jr's Anti-Vaxxer back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.146.50.155 (talk) 22:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheryl Hines name and first line

[edit]

Page has been edited to say "she is retarded and likes to kill puppies in her free time". Please correct this and her name has been edited to say Cheryl Hines Jr. 2806:1016:B:BD6:25D3:7DEB:17C9:1AE5 (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and vaccine

[edit]

@Discospinster and Cambial Yellowing: is there a way to include in an encyclopedic way the info the IPs want to insert (the Variety piece for example appears to be a feature RS whose views do not appear to be incorporated into the article) or is there really some big issue here? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Variety article (if this is the one you are talking about) is about RFK Jr's views and how he feared she would suffer backlash from them. It doesn't say anything about how her views might be amplified due to her being married to him. ... discospinster talk 19:02, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikikinkajou: it looks like you have an opinion about this as well. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMO this article is being White Washed by people connected with Hines to make her appear like just a loving Wife instead of Mrs MAHA.
But she is literally standing behind him in every photo (Hearing, confirmation etc) and quote.
Her importance to the World as the wife of RFK Jr far exceeds any TV show she has done.
While of course, this article is not about RFK JR, her association is amplified because of the huge impact RFK JR is having (much like Melania)
I am saying this here in the Talk quotes were removed within a Minute anytime I inserted them in there.
It's clear that Paid people are now monitoring this page. These are not volunteer Editors.
It's well documented that Hines is Blacklisted from any roles now because of her "Support" for RFK Jr's
Quote 1:
Jun 10, 2023
https://variety.com/2023/tv/politicians/cheryl-hines-robert-f-kennedy-jr-separation-offer-vaccine-1235639704/
“I see both sides of the vaccine situation,” Hines says in the new profile. “There’s one side that feels scared if they don’t get the vaccine, and there’s the side that feels scared if they do get the vaccine, because they’re not sure if the vaccine is safe. And I understand that.”
Quote 2:
title "How Cheryl Hines Went From Hollywood Star to Mrs. MAHA"
Wall Street Journal on August 14, 2025
https://www.wsj.com/style/cheryl-hines-rfk-jr-marriage-politics-a8fa6afd
"Is science ever settled?" and commented on the nature of drug development, saying, "It's like any drug that goes on the market that at the beginning everybody thinks is great, and then 10 years later, they realize it's causing some sort of issue"
I urge others to help me to prevent this article from "White Washing" Cheryl Hines Wikikinkajou (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another article from Jezebel not behind payroll which documents these quotes:
https://www.jezebel.com/cheryl-hines-anti-vax-robert-f-kennedy-jr-1850529235 Wikikinkajou (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've not edited content from a Variety article, but having skimread it, Discospinster's summary appears accurate. I removed:

  1. an unsupported heading
  2. content from news sources that made no mention of the article subject
  3. a plagiarised (uncredited) repost on unionleader.com of a New York Daily News article, that does not support the proposed content (as I remarked in edit summary, the source states "“It’s time that actress, Cheryl Hines, stops getting a pass,” wrote another X commenter. “Standing by her ‘husband’ is abhorrent as he poses a deadly threat to all Americans and our healthcare system.”" This is the only reference to the subject in relation to vaccines in the source: one X user. It doesn't support "with many commenters describing her support as inappropriate in light of Kennedy’s record on vaccines".) The view of one X user is not encyclopaedic content.
  4. a post on pajiba.com, self-described as "a small political blog that eventually found a larger audience"
  5. a post on WP:JEZEBEL with a false authorship in the template to the Financial Times Middle East correspondent, who, unsurprisingly, does not write articles about American celebrities, and has no connection to the website. Her and Cheryl Hines' names do not appear together on the internet[1]

No objection to the use of the NYT profile, which has three short paragraphs about her views on vaccines. It is, however, a very-wide-ranging interview, and to cherry-pick three paragraphs with no mention of the views contained in some of the remaining fifty-eight paragraphs would be unbalanced, to say the least. Cambial foliar❧ 17:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The argument that the quotes are unattributed to her or the major thrust of the article is not about Cheyrly Hines are Bullshit.
Of course the main subject is going to be RFK JR.
He is the Most dangerous man in the world and she is squarely behind him as is well documented in numerous articles.
The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal both have quotes from her saying Anti-Vax stuff.
We are talking about the wife of the Most Dangerous Man in the World.
She's the Eva Brun 10X
Those articles are behind a pay wall. So I used articles that quoted them.
There is no argument for Removing attributable quotes that indicate her true support for the Anti-Vax movment. The arguments being made would be those made by a CHeryl Hines Publicist Wikikinkajou (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hope somebody can take this article that happened Tudesday on the View and run with it to stop the White Washing of Hines by her People.
It's very obvious Hines has gone FULL MAGA Lunatic Crackpot even though she has been trying hide it.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/articles/cheryl-hines-pushes-against-view-185932354.html Wikikinkajou (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You mischaracterise the accurate statement in the post above that several of the sources previously inserted into the article make no mention of the article subject. You claim The argument that the quotes are unattributed to her or the major thrust of the article is not about Cheyrly Hines are Bullshit. [sic] No-one has made that argument. The fact is that numerous proposed sources make no mention of Hines at all. The issue is not that "the major thrust of the article is not about Cheyrly Hines". It is that those articles are not about Cheryl Hines at all; they do not mention her. They therefore do not support content about Cheryl Hines. I'll not be engaging in an extended discussion about fabricated claims about the statements of other editors nor about content that lacks a reliable source. This website is not a news website, and adding every appearance of the subject in any news article is not encyclopaedic content. The excerpts from the NYT profile give her expressed views. Cambial foliar❧ 13:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Putting a Lunatic Anti-Vax Crackpot and his backing wife Eva Braun in charge of HHS and every American's Health care is not just a passing news story. That's like saying WWII was a news Story.
We are living in real time the WW III on the Health Care of Ameicans by RFK'Jr and Cheryl Hines. She is his Eva Braun and even worse. Historians have said Eva Braun did not know about Hitler's misdeeds until the end but Hines knows 110% what is going on and she fully supports it. Wikikinkajou (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


References

  1. ^ A google search indicates one result: a Wikipedia mirror of this article that evidently refreshed while the fabricated attribution was on the page