An approach to evaluating relative effectiveness in non-profit institutions
Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Mar 1, 2008
We present, in this study, a method for comparing the relative effectiveness of different non-pro... more We present, in this study, a method for comparing the relative effectiveness of different non-profit institutions with similar objectives. In addition, we show how this measure of relative effectiveness is related theoretically to their relative efficiency. Relative effectiveness is shown to be a product of the efficacy with which potentially utilizable resources can be converted into usable inputs, and the efficiency with which the inputs are converted to outputs or outcomes. Finally, drawing on developments in data envelopment analysis, we illustrate the new methodology using data from 109 institutions of higher education.
Uploads
Papers by Yaw Mensah
This paper evaluates the prevalent view that accounting information competes with, but also disciplines, information from other sources by examining the inferential value to investors of accounting versus non-accounting information. Inferential value is defined as the ability of the capital markets to draw the correct inference from the information signals regarding future firm performance. Both average quarterly accounting rate of return on equity and excess stock returns are used as measures of firm performance. The findings indicate that a market-normalized accounting rate of return derived from stock prices and excess returns measured around earnings announcement dates are more highly correlated with changes in future firm performance than similar measures in the non-disclosure periods. The findings support the prevalent view that accounting information disciplines information from other sources.
a trans log budget model by outlining a more complete budgetary system. It
is shown that a frontier cost function generated from the ordinary least
squares (OLS) translog function can be used to identify four types of
inefficiencies: the degree of technical, allocative, and scale inefficiency as
well as institutional X-inefficiency (Liebenstein 1966). These four types of
inefficiencies are then linked to both the long-term and short-term
objectives of budgeting; namely, performance evaluation, subordinate
manager motivation, planning, and control.
The second objective of the study is to compare the translog budget
model (as revised) against the most frequently applied alternative
technique, the nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA), in the
same context. From the standpoint of a routine budgetary control system,
it was found that the DEA model is more suitable than the translog model.