Ergative marking system in Changki

References

Amenla, Changkija I. 2024. A socio-semantic study of personal names: A Preliminary. In Changkija, Rosy Yumnam & I. Amenla Changkija (eds.), Studies in language, literature and linguistics, 1–10. New Delhi: Taran Publication.Search in Google Scholar

Benedict, Paul King (ed.). 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Contributing editor: James A. Matisoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753541Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, David. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics no. 14: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.10.32655/LTBA.19.1.02Search in Google Scholar

Caasm. 2018. Changki ayu rongmen. Nagaland: Changki Ayim Asem Senso Mungdang.Search in Google Scholar

Changkiri, Temjentenzuk. 2023. Chumi: Mezentepri Otsü aa. Dimapur: Temjentenzuk Changkiri.Search in Google Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198522Search in Google Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2011. On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(2). 21–47. https://doi.org/10.32655/ltba.34.2.03.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3). 626–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/414343.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1984. Transitivity and ergative case in Lhasa Tibetan. In Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 131–140. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v10i0.1976Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.289.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2011. “Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(2). 9–20. https://doi.org/10.32655/ltba.34.2.02.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/412519.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Cathryn & Mark Donohue. 2016. On ergativity in Bumthang. Language 92(1). 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0004.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037.Search in Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2024. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 27th edn. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com (accessed 19 November 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1985. Ergative morphology and transitivity gradient in Newari. In Franz Plank (ed.), Relational typology, 89–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110848731.89Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.280Search in Google Scholar

Hirschmann, David. 1971. Inanimate agency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72. 195–213.10.1093/aristotelian/72.1.195Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017.Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 1995. ‘Ergative’ marking in Tibeto-Burman. In Yoshio Nishi, James Matisoff & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), New horizons in Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax, 189–228 (Senri Ethnological Studies 41). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Search in Google Scholar

Longkumer, Jungmayangla. 2005. A sociological study of an Ao naga village changki village. Shillong: North-Eastern Hill University Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. 2015. Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate-inanimate distinction. Cognition 136. 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.021.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Man, Jeroen van de Weijer, Chris Sinha & Zhengguang Liu. 2019. Optional ergative marking in Tujia. Lingua 223. 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.02.011.Search in Google Scholar

Marrison, Geoffrey E. 1967. The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India, volume I (Texts) and volume II (Appendices). London: SOAS, University of London Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. 2015. The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. Berkeley: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, William B. 1992. The semantics of ergative marking in Gooniyandi. Linguistics 30. 275–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.2.275.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, William B. 2006. Focal and optional ergative marking in Warrwa (Kimberley, Western Australia). Lingua 116(4). 393–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, William B. 2007. Ergative marking of intransitive subjects in Warrwa. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27. 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600701531351.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, William B. 2009. Typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 480–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00118.x.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, William B. 2010. Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120(7). 1610–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Monsang, Sh. Francis & Rajesh Kumar. 2020. Ergative marking in Monsang. SKY Journal of Linguistics 33. 49–66.Search in Google Scholar

Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity. John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.72Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805066Search in Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert. 1955. The classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 11. 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1955.11659552.Search in Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert. 1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Weisbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Subbarao, Karumuri V. 2012. South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139003575Search in Google Scholar

Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2010. Animacy and information structure in the system of ergative marking in Umpithamu. Lingua 120(7). 1637–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.011.Search in Google Scholar

Vollmann, Ralf. 2014. Optional ergative case marking in Tibetan. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237223944_Optional_ergative_case_marking_in_Tibetan (accessed 28 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Watters, David E. 1973. Clause patterns in Kham. In Austin Hale (ed.), Clause, sentence, and discourse patterns in selected languages of Nepal. Part 1, general approach, 39–202. Norman, Oklahoma: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Oklahoma.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, Christina M. 2011. Optional case marking in Darma (Tibeto-Burman). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(2). 101–131. https://doi.org/10.32655/ltba.34.2.06.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Philip, Ga-hyun Jeon & Yu Li. 2009. Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition 1. 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2009.009.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Phillip, Ga-hyun Jeon, Bianca Klettke & Yu Li. 2010. Force creation and possible causes across languages. In Barbara Malt & Philip Wolff (eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, 93–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0006Search in Google Scholar