Academia.eduAcademia.edu

In terms of test of difference in the physical growth and academic performance of the beneficiaries when group according to the respondents’ sex. In terms of physical grown, specifically height, males projected a mean of .0210 while females anticipated a mean of .0188, the mean difference for this indicator was at .002, t- value of 1.716 and a significance of .243, which is not significant at all.  On the other hand, still under physical growth, males showed a mean of .1801, females at .1708 mean for weight, with a mean difference of .009, 73 degree of freedom, .501 t- value and a significance of  tnd the  Table 5

Table 5 In terms of test of difference in the physical growth and academic performance of the beneficiaries when group according to the respondents’ sex. In terms of physical grown, specifically height, males projected a mean of .0210 while females anticipated a mean of .0188, the mean difference for this indicator was at .002, t- value of 1.716 and a significance of .243, which is not significant at all. On the other hand, still under physical growth, males showed a mean of .1801, females at .1708 mean for weight, with a mean difference of .009, 73 degree of freedom, .501 t- value and a significance of tnd the Table 5