Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Legend: 1.00 — 1.75 —2.24 = Sa Based on .25 =Excellent; 1.26 — 1.74 =Very Satisfactory; isfactory; 2.25 — 2.74 = Fair; 2.75 — 3.00 = Poor the table 2, majority of the students has a poor clinical performance in Internship 1 and fair in Internship 2. accepted set Physical Therapy profession lacks of standards (criteria) and evaluation forms in the c inical education centers [2]. ; Table 2. Student Internship Performance on Different Affiliated Hospitals/C enters (N=27)

Table 2 Legend: 1.00 — 1.75 —2.24 = Sa Based on .25 =Excellent; 1.26 — 1.74 =Very Satisfactory; isfactory; 2.25 — 2.74 = Fair; 2.75 — 3.00 = Poor the table 2, majority of the students has a poor clinical performance in Internship 1 and fair in Internship 2. accepted set Physical Therapy profession lacks of standards (criteria) and evaluation forms in the c inical education centers [2]. ; Table 2. Student Internship Performance on Different Affiliated Hospitals/C enters (N=27)

Related Figures (3)

Legend: 1.00 — 1.25 =Excellent; 1.26 — 1.74 =Very Satisfactory; 1.75 — 2.24 = Satisfactory; 2.25 — 2.74 = Fair; 2.75 —3.00 = Poor
Legend: 1.00 — 1.25 =Excellent; 1.26 — 1.74 =Very Satisfactory; 1.75 — 2.24 = Satisfactory; 2.25 — 2.74 = Fair; 2.75 —3.00 = Poor
Table 3. Correlation between Laboratory Performance and Internship 1 Performance
Table 3. Correlation between Laboratory Performance and Internship 1 Performance
Table 4. Correlation between Laboratory Performance and Internship 2 Performance
Table 4. Correlation between Laboratory Performance and Internship 2 Performance
Related topics:
laboratory performance
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved