Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Mukunda BG

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 6: New factors named (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts).

Table 6 New factors named (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts).

Related Figures (6)

Table 1: Descriptive characteristics of participants (N=372). Reliability and validity of responses obtained from the questionnaire
Table 1: Descriptive characteristics of participants (N=372). Reliability and validity of responses obtained from the questionnaire
Table 3: KMO and Bartlett's test (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana). Table 4: Total variance explained (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana).
Table 3: KMO and Bartlett's test (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana). Table 4: Total variance explained (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana).
Note: Extraction method: Principal component analysis.
Note: Extraction method: Principal component analysis.
Table 2: Rating of tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana
Table 2: Rating of tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana
Table 7: Multiple regression model (Tourists’ perception towards local handicrafts). Note: a. Dependent variable: Tourist’s perception
Table 7: Multiple regression model (Tourists’ perception towards local handicrafts). Note: a. Dependent variable: Tourist’s perception
Table 5: Rotated component matrix (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana). Note: a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.
Table 5: Rotated component matrix (tourist perception towards the local handicrafts at Channapatana). Note: a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.
Related topics:
PerceptionHandicraft tourism
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved