Figure 2 Hydrostatic principle of the ball-burnishing tool.
Related Figures (12)
Fig. 3. Significance of effects upon burnishing process. Fig. 6. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.2 mm, ft = 0.10 mm/rev. Fig. 5. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.2 mm, ft = 0.075 mm/rev. Fig. 4. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.2 mm, ft = 0.05 mm/rev. Fig. 15. Roughness vs. burnishing feed: R = 0.8 mm, p = 38 MPa. Fig. 10. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.8 mm, ft = 0.10 mm/rev. Fig. 9. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.4mm, ft = 0.14 mm/rev Figs. 4-12 show that, for all cases studied the higher pres- sure (38 MPa) led to better surface roughness, and better orig- inal surface caused better final roughness. For the hardness involved (over 59 HRC), an efficient way of burnishing must Fig. 8. Roughness vs. pressure: R = 0.4mm, ft = 0.11 mm/rev. Fig. 18. Roughness reduction vs. burnishing feed: R = 0.8 mm, p = 38 MPa. Fig. 17. Roughness reduction vs. burnishing feed: R = 0.4 mm, p = 38 MPa. Fig. 16. Roughness reduction vs. burnishing feed: R = 0.2 mm, p = 38 MPa.
