Academia.eduAcademia.edu

start to finish but, rather, were multiple and constantly developing - diverging, converging, and ultimately cohering into new ideas. Outcomes gave rise to spin-off ideas and projects. The people in the innovation journey did not resemble a single entrepreneur leading a fixed set of people over time but, rather, were a fluidly forming and loosely bounded group with multiple members taking a variety of different roles over time. Transactions did not take place in an orderly and prespecified manner but among an expanding and contracting network of stakeholders. The context was not a static backdrop providing opportunities for innovation but a subjective enacted reality that both supported and constrained the innovation process. Finally, the process was not simple and cumulative but consisted of many divergent, parallel and convergent paths, some related, others not (Table 1.)  There exist few studies of innovation journeys of eco-innovations. But we can expect that the above insights pertain largely also to eco-innovations. Constraining and enabling factors may be different, though. In the case of pollution control, regulatory demand plays an important role, guiding research in terms of the design parameters and managerial decisions. Cleaner process technologies and product innovations still have to meet normal user requirements in order to be successfully taken up.  factors may be different, though. In the case of pollution control, regulatory demand plays

Table 1 start to finish but, rather, were multiple and constantly developing - diverging, converging, and ultimately cohering into new ideas. Outcomes gave rise to spin-off ideas and projects. The people in the innovation journey did not resemble a single entrepreneur leading a fixed set of people over time but, rather, were a fluidly forming and loosely bounded group with multiple members taking a variety of different roles over time. Transactions did not take place in an orderly and prespecified manner but among an expanding and contracting network of stakeholders. The context was not a static backdrop providing opportunities for innovation but a subjective enacted reality that both supported and constrained the innovation process. Finally, the process was not simple and cumulative but consisted of many divergent, parallel and convergent paths, some related, others not (Table 1.) There exist few studies of innovation journeys of eco-innovations. But we can expect that the above insights pertain largely also to eco-innovations. Constraining and enabling factors may be different, though. In the case of pollution control, regulatory demand plays an important role, guiding research in terms of the design parameters and managerial decisions. Cleaner process technologies and product innovations still have to meet normal user requirements in order to be successfully taken up. factors may be different, though. In the case of pollution control, regulatory demand plays