Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 5 – uploaded by Kaveh Ostad-Ali-Askari

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 6. | Simulated Discharge river with variable Manning Overland Roughness coefficient to compare Measured Discharge.

Figure 6 | Simulated Discharge river with variable Manning Overland Roughness coefficient to compare Measured Discharge.

Related Figures (12)

Fig. 1. | Show the position of Haraz Watershed (Mazandaran Province, Iran). (Naeeji et al., 2020; Dadar et al., 2016). basic is located between the Amlash and Babol rivers (Shrestha et al, 2020). The southern district of the plain is enclosed by mountains and highlands (Schuol et al., 2006). The zone covers from the Damavand peak (5675 ma.s.1.) as the highest height in the highlands to the deepest region with -25 m a.s.l. in the plain. The study zone (6850 km?) is drained by the two foremost streams Haraz and Babolroud (Baéova Mitkova et al., 2023). These stable streams instigate from the Alborz elevations and grasp the Caspian Sea after passing through forestlands, rangelands, urban zones and agronomic land in the Haraz plain. In terms of geomorphology, the Haraz plain can be watershed is approximately 66.81 square kilometers and the main river stretches for 16.8 kilometers. The geographical coordinates of the rivers are as follows: latitude from 36°-06’ to 36°-15’ N, and longitude from 53°-15’ to 53° -29’ E. Fig. 1 shows the position of Haraz watershed. The mentioned statistical parameters were retrieved from Karehsang, Chelav and Razan, Panjab places. Haraz River shows a significant part in the exists of the persons of this area, particularly in their agronomic segment. The Haraz plain is located in the Mazandaran province, one of the northern provinces of Iran between the Caspian Sea and the Alborz mountains. This seaside
Fig. 1. | Show the position of Haraz Watershed (Mazandaran Province, Iran). (Naeeji et al., 2020; Dadar et al., 2016). basic is located between the Amlash and Babol rivers (Shrestha et al, 2020). The southern district of the plain is enclosed by mountains and highlands (Schuol et al., 2006). The zone covers from the Damavand peak (5675 ma.s.1.) as the highest height in the highlands to the deepest region with -25 m a.s.l. in the plain. The study zone (6850 km?) is drained by the two foremost streams Haraz and Babolroud (Baéova Mitkova et al., 2023). These stable streams instigate from the Alborz elevations and grasp the Caspian Sea after passing through forestlands, rangelands, urban zones and agronomic land in the Haraz plain. In terms of geomorphology, the Haraz plain can be watershed is approximately 66.81 square kilometers and the main river stretches for 16.8 kilometers. The geographical coordinates of the rivers are as follows: latitude from 36°-06’ to 36°-15’ N, and longitude from 53°-15’ to 53° -29’ E. Fig. 1 shows the position of Haraz watershed. The mentioned statistical parameters were retrieved from Karehsang, Chelav and Razan, Panjab places. Haraz River shows a significant part in the exists of the persons of this area, particularly in their agronomic segment. The Haraz plain is located in the Mazandaran province, one of the northern provinces of Iran between the Caspian Sea and the Alborz mountains. This seaside
ble 2. Inspect operative Over land Roughness factor in the Average Discharge design
ble 2. Inspect operative Over land Roughness factor in the Average Discharge design
Fig. 2. Comparation Monthly Simulated Release of the SWAT with Quantified overflow. and contrasted with the experiential overflow. It should be stated that in this phase of computations individual rainfall information were fed into the prototypical. Fig. 3 shows difference CN2 Simulated Discharge. Fig. 4 shows difference Manning Overland Roughness coefficient with Simulated Discharge. In this phase of investigation, other essential climatological component with temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and solar radiation in addition to Examine effective curve number in the Average Simulated Discharge Sympathy Investigation of Climatological Components in Stream Overflow
Fig. 2. Comparation Monthly Simulated Release of the SWAT with Quantified overflow. and contrasted with the experiential overflow. It should be stated that in this phase of computations individual rainfall information were fed into the prototypical. Fig. 3 shows difference CN2 Simulated Discharge. Fig. 4 shows difference Manning Overland Roughness coefficient with Simulated Discharge. In this phase of investigation, other essential climatological component with temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and solar radiation in addition to Examine effective curve number in the Average Simulated Discharge Sympathy Investigation of Climatological Components in Stream Overflow
In order to study the sensitivity of the runoff estimated by the model to precipitation, initially, all precipitation values were multiplied to 1.52 and the runoff was
In order to study the sensitivity of the runoff estimated by the model to precipitation, initially, all precipitation values were multiplied to 1.52 and the runoff was
Fig. 5. | Simulated Discharge river with variable curve number to compare Measured Discharge. Fig. 4. Difference Manning Overland Roughness coefficient with Simulated Discharge.
Fig. 5. | Simulated Discharge river with variable curve number to compare Measured Discharge. Fig. 4. Difference Manning Overland Roughness coefficient with Simulated Discharge.
Ostad-Ali-Askari et al.: Soil and water assessment too! model for runoff reaction to land use variations... Fig. 8. Result Simulated Discharge with Difference information input Sola Radiation.
Ostad-Ali-Askari et al.: Soil and water assessment too! model for runoff reaction to land use variations... Fig. 8. Result Simulated Discharge with Difference information input Sola Radiation.
Fig. 9. | Consequence Replicated Release Average Monthly with Alteration data input Relative Moisture.
Fig. 9. | Consequence Replicated Release Average Monthly with Alteration data input Relative Moisture.
Alteration Simulated Release with Change data Input Temperature
Alteration Simulated Release with Change data Input Temperature
Fig. 10. Simulated Discharge with Difference information input Wind Speed.
Fig. 10. Simulated Discharge with Difference information input Wind Speed.
Fig. 11. Simulated Discharge with Difference information Input Temperature
Fig. 11. Simulated Discharge with Difference information Input Temperature
Related topics:
Hydrology/HydrographyHydrologyWatershed HydrologyHydraulic and HydrologyStatistical HydrologyHydrological modelling
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved