Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Gergely Kovásznai

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 1. The architecture of BV2EPR

Figure 1 The architecture of BV2EPR

Related Figures (2)

Table 1. Evaluation for the original SMT2 file Boolector is switched off. We give the file sizes (in bytes) in all formats and additionally provide the runtimes of Boolector (for SMT2), Lingeling (for CNF), and iProver (for EPR), using a timeout of 10 minutes.
Table 1. Evaluation for the original SMT2 file Boolector is switched off. We give the file sizes (in bytes) in all formats and additionally provide the runtimes of Boolector (for SMT2), Lingeling (for CNF), and iProver (for EPR), using a timeout of 10 minutes.
Table 2. Evaluation for the simplified SMT2 file benchmarks where iProver is faster. While it is probably still possible to improve EPR solvers on this kind of instances, formulas generated by BV2EPR can also help providing challenging benchmarks for current state-of-the-art solvers. The tool BV2EPR is available at [7].
Table 2. Evaluation for the simplified SMT2 file benchmarks where iProver is faster. While it is probably still possible to improve EPR solvers on this kind of instances, formulas generated by BV2EPR can also help providing challenging benchmarks for current state-of-the-art solvers. The tool BV2EPR is available at [7].
Related topics:
Computer Science
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved