Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Mark Palmer

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 3. The first version of the Gyre and Gimble environment and an example of interactive objects. Sir John Tenniel’s origina illustrations inspired the nonphotorealistic rendering.

Figure 3 The first version of the Gyre and Gimble environment and an example of interactive objects. Sir John Tenniel’s origina illustrations inspired the nonphotorealistic rendering.

Related Figures (8)

Figure 1. Integrating Al-based behavior in the game engine's event system. of interaction. The collision of objects that then occurred as a result of an object’s desire to escape constituted, from the system per- spective, the starting point for the computa- tion of chains of events (and consequences). arising out of the situations and conversations in which Alice finds herself. Take, for exam- ple, this conversation from Alice’s Adven- tures in Wonderland and Through the Look- ing Glass (Penguin Books, 1998):
Figure 1. Integrating Al-based behavior in the game engine's event system. of interaction. The collision of objects that then occurred as a result of an object’s desire to escape constituted, from the system per- spective, the starting point for the computa- tion of chains of events (and consequences). arising out of the situations and conversations in which Alice finds herself. Take, for exam- ple, this conversation from Alice’s Adven- tures in Wonderland and Through the Look- ing Glass (Penguin Books, 1998):
Figure 2. An overview of the system architecture. The system is based on a game engine ported to a CAVE-like immersive display.
Figure 2. An overview of the system architecture. The system is based on a game engine ported to a CAVE-like immersive display.
Figure 4. Structured representation of an object in the ontology.
Figure 4. Structured representation of an object in the ontology.
Figure 5. The cause-effect (CE) action and its use of objects’ semantic properties.
Figure 5. The cause-effect (CE) action and its use of objects’ semantic properties.
Figure 6. The application of the CHANGE-EFFECT Macro-Operator (MOp). The book hits the candle while trying to escape the user's gaze. Upon impact, the candle should normally tilt forward. However, the system intercepts the action and modifies its default consequences using MOp, resulting in the candle being set alight instead.
Figure 6. The application of the CHANGE-EFFECT Macro-Operator (MOp). The book hits the candle while trying to escape the user's gaze. Upon impact, the candle should normally tilt forward. However, the system intercepts the action and modifies its default consequences using MOp, resulting in the candle being set alight instead.
Figure 7. The Plausibility matrix provides heuristic coefficients based on the difference in type between the original and modified effects.
Figure 7. The Plausibility matrix provides heuristic coefficients based on the difference in type between the original and modified effects.
Figure 8. The user behavior is interpreted in terms of her relation to the environmen: and determines the environment reaction.
Figure 8. The user behavior is interpreted in terms of her relation to the environmen: and determines the environment reaction.
Figure 9. The “level of disruption” is a parameter governing the generation of unrealistic causality.
Figure 9. The “level of disruption” is a parameter governing the generation of unrealistic causality.
Related topics:
Cognitive ScienceArtificial IntelligenceArt
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved