Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by M. Violante

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
RESULTS OF FAULT INJECTION ON THE PROCESSORS TABLE II

Table 2 RESULTS OF FAULT INJECTION ON THE PROCESSORS TABLE II

Related Figures (7)

Fig. 2. Example of execution of rollback recovery using checkpoint. ‘ig. 1. Flow chart of rollback recovery using checkpoint.
Fig. 2. Example of execution of rollback recovery using checkpoint. ‘ig. 1. Flow chart of rollback recovery using checkpoint.
Fig. 3. Architecture of the synchronized lockstep with rollback.
Fig. 3. Architecture of the synchronized lockstep with rollback.
manifests itself within the same execution cycle during which it is latched has been increased, and so the probability of suc- cessful execution of the rollback, thereby providing higher de- pendability for the whole system.
manifests itself within the same execution cycle during which it is latched has been increased, and so the probability of suc- cessful execution of the rollback, thereby providing higher de- pendability for the whole system.
Fig. 4. Architecture modified to include the WHT.
Fig. 4. Architecture modified to include the WHT.
DATA SEGMENT SIZE BREAK-EVEN POINT FOR USE OF WHT
DATA SEGMENT SIZE BREAK-EVEN POINT FOR USE OF WHT
Related topics:
EngineeringComputer ScienceBiomedical EngineeringProcessor ArchitectureFault InjectionFlexibility in engineering designField Programmable Gate ArrayRollback recoverySingle Event EffectsEmbedded System
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved