Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 8 – uploaded by Alaric J Fisher

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 8 Spearman's Rank Correlation (r,) for behaviours and cu- mulative rainfall and rainfall during the previous week. Only signif- icant variables are shown. Discussion

Table 8 Spearman's Rank Correlation (r,) for behaviours and cu- mulative rainfall and rainfall during the previous week. Only signif- icant variables are shown. Discussion

Related Figures (12)

Table 1 Variables used to characterise the active mounds of Or- ange-footed Scrubfowl, disused mound sites and random sites. Variables labelled with # were remeasured in the wet season.
Table 1 Variables used to characterise the active mounds of Or- ange-footed Scrubfowl, disused mound sites and random sites. Variables labelled with # were remeasured in the wet season.
Table 2 Behaviours recorded from a pair of Orange-footed Scrubfowl at their mound.
Table 2 Behaviours recorded from a pair of Orange-footed Scrubfowl at their mound.
Table 4 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way Analysis of Variance results for site variables measured in the dry and wet seasons for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the regeneration forest (n = 3 active mounds, 6 random sites). Wet season variables are in parentheses. Only significant variables are presented. Mound temperatures
Table 4 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way Analysis of Variance results for site variables measured in the dry and wet seasons for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the regeneration forest (n = 3 active mounds, 6 random sites). Wet season variables are in parentheses. Only significant variables are presented. Mound temperatures
Table 3 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way Analysis of Varaince results for site variables measured in the dry and wet seasons for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the monsoon forest (n = 5 active mounds, 10 random sites and two disused mounds): active mounds versus random sites: active mounds versus disused mounds. Wet season variables are in parentheses. Only significant variables are presented (ns, not significant).
Table 3 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way Analysis of Varaince results for site variables measured in the dry and wet seasons for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the monsoon forest (n = 5 active mounds, 10 random sites and two disused mounds): active mounds versus random sites: active mounds versus disused mounds. Wet season variables are in parentheses. Only significant variables are presented (ns, not significant).
Table 5 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA results for site variables measured in the dry season for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the sandy coastal vine thicket (n = two ac- tive mounds, six random sites). Only significant variables are pre- sented.
Table 5 Summary of Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA results for site variables measured in the dry season for Orange-footed Scrubfowl mounds in the sandy coastal vine thicket (n = two ac- tive mounds, six random sites). Only significant variables are pre- sented.
Table 6 Summary of one-way ANOVA results for site variables measured in the dry season at active mounds in monsoon forest (n = 5), regeneration forest (n = 3), and the sandy coastal vine thicket area (n = 2). Only significant results are listed. Differences among the means were determined by a Student-Newman—Kuels means separation test. Means with the same letter are not signifi- cantly different.
Table 6 Summary of one-way ANOVA results for site variables measured in the dry season at active mounds in monsoon forest (n = 5), regeneration forest (n = 3), and the sandy coastal vine thicket area (n = 2). Only significant results are listed. Differences among the means were determined by a Student-Newman—Kuels means separation test. Means with the same letter are not signifi- cantly different.
Table 7 Comparison of behavioural categories among four daily observation periods. Values are mean percentage of time spent on each activity. The only significant differ- ences were with respect to the early time period, during which more time was spent on these activities.
Table 7 Comparison of behavioural categories among four daily observation periods. Values are mean percentage of time spent on each activity. The only significant differ- ences were with respect to the early time period, during which more time was spent on these activities.
Figure 2 Weekly mean percentage of time Orange-footed Scrub- fowl spent scratching over a 19-week period from October 1993 to March 1994 for male (a) and female (b). The scratching data (line) are superimposed on weekly rainfall (bars).
Figure 2 Weekly mean percentage of time Orange-footed Scrub- fowl spent scratching over a 19-week period from October 1993 to March 1994 for male (a) and female (b). The scratching data (line) are superimposed on weekly rainfall (bars).
Figure 3 Weekly mean percentage of time Orange-footed Scrub- fowl spent collecting leaf litter over a 19-week period from Octo- ber 1993 to March 1994 for male (a) and female (b). The collect- ing data (line) are superimposed on weekly rainfall (bars). Palmer, Christian & Fisher: Mound Characteristics of a Ground-nesting Bird
Figure 3 Weekly mean percentage of time Orange-footed Scrub- fowl spent collecting leaf litter over a 19-week period from Octo- ber 1993 to March 1994 for male (a) and female (b). The collect- ing data (line) are superimposed on weekly rainfall (bars). Palmer, Christian & Fisher: Mound Characteristics of a Ground-nesting Bird
Related topics:
ZoologyOrnithologyConservation BiologyBiologyEcologyENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved