Fig. 2 The document sizes distribution Fig. 3. The requests number distribution / 100 s Fig. 5 The relation between the cache size and the byte hit rate Fig. 4 The relation between the cache size and the hit rate Fig. 7 LFU, LFU-DA and GDSF byte hit rate Fig. 6 LFU, LFU-DA and GDSF hit rate Unlike the Fig. 7, the Fig. 9 shows that GDSFR provides better byte hit rate than LFRU-DA. In fact, the relative fre- quency corrects the GDSFR weaknesses for the reason that Fig. 9 LFRU, LFRU-DA and GDSFR byte hit rate Fig. 13 LFU, LFU-DA, GDSF, LFRU, LFRU-DA and GDSFR byte hit rate Fig. 12 LFU, LFU-DA, GDSF, LFRU, LFRU-DA and GDSFR hit rate
