Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by robert Wadada

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 2: Age and financial literacy performance of rural women Distribution of economic factors of rural women

Table 2 Age and financial literacy performance of rural women Distribution of economic factors of rural women

Related Figures (5)

Table 3: Economic factors of rural women
Table 3: Economic factors of rural women
Distribution of financial behavior factors of rural women Volume:08, Issue:01 "January 2023" Table 4: Financial behavior factors of rural women
Distribution of financial behavior factors of rural women Volume:08, Issue:01 "January 2023" Table 4: Financial behavior factors of rural women
Influence of financial behavior factors on financial literacy among rural women Volume:08, Issue:01 "January 2023" International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research
Influence of financial behavior factors on financial literacy among rural women Volume:08, Issue:01 "January 2023" International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research
From Table 6, on average, women who were neither economical nor spending-oriented were expected to have financial literacy performance of 10.34 more than those who were very economical with p-value of 0.037* (CI=0.63-20.05). Also, women who had maintained minima! financial records, on average, were expected to have financial literacy performance of 7.05 more compared to those that never maintained any financial records, with p-value of 0.033*(CI=0.57- 13.53). Again, on average, women who planned and implemented a regular savings programme were expected to have financial literacy level of 13.04 more compared to those who did not plan and implement a regular savings programme with a p-value of 0.000* (CI=6.00-20.07). Ir addition, women who budgeted and tracked their spending, on average, they were expected tc have a financial literacy performance of 6.35 more compared to women who did not budget and track their spending with a p-value of 0.010* (CI=0.63-12.08).
From Table 6, on average, women who were neither economical nor spending-oriented were expected to have financial literacy performance of 10.34 more than those who were very economical with p-value of 0.037* (CI=0.63-20.05). Also, women who had maintained minima! financial records, on average, were expected to have financial literacy performance of 7.05 more compared to those that never maintained any financial records, with p-value of 0.033*(CI=0.57- 13.53). Again, on average, women who planned and implemented a regular savings programme were expected to have financial literacy level of 13.04 more compared to those who did not plan and implement a regular savings programme with a p-value of 0.000* (CI=6.00-20.07). Ir addition, women who budgeted and tracked their spending, on average, they were expected tc have a financial literacy performance of 6.35 more compared to women who did not budget and track their spending with a p-value of 0.010* (CI=0.63-12.08).
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved