TABLE 3: MATERIALS Seismic load TABLE 2: GEOMETRY DETAILS International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (ijsrset.com) alternate exterior, Damping device alternate interior Figure 7 : displacement of different earthquake zones on model 2.1 Figure 7 : displacement of different earthquake zones and Zone II is 53.5 mm, the results are expected. Figure 6 : Displacement graph on model 1 III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Figure 9 shows story displacement of 30 stories square-shaped building (3 m story height and 90 meter building height) with 390 numbers of damping device arranged with different configuration. In this study, the damping device at exterior alternate story is displacement only 153.1 mm (30% displacement reduces compared to without any damping device), damping device at alternate exterior is 182.9 mm (15.28% displacement reduces compared to without any damping device) and damping device at alternate interior is 219.8 mm (1.66% displacement reduces compared to without any damping device). Figure 8 : displacement of different story height on model 2.1 161.8 mm. device arranged with different configuration. In this tudy, the damping device at exterior alternate story is isplacement only 153.1 mm (30% _ displacement educes compared to without any damping device), isplacement reduces compared to without any damping evice) and damping device at alternate interior is 219.8 S d r damping device at alternate exterior is 182.9 mm (15.28% d d mm (1.66% displacement reduces compared to without any damping device). a displacement only 181.2 mm (40% displacement reduces compared to without any damping device), damping device at alternate exterior is 257.2 mm (15.285 displacement reduces compared to without any damping device) and damping device at alternate interior is 274.9 mm (9.45 % displacement reduces compared to without any damping device). a The Figure 13 shows story displacement of 30 stories circular-shaped building with 390 numbers of damping evice arranged with different configuration. In this tudy, the damping device at exterior alternate story is isplacement only 124.7. mm (37.65% displacement educes compared to without any damping device), amping device at alternate exterior is 155 mm (22.5% isplacement reduces compared to without any damping ce S ce tT d d a evice) and damping device at alternate interior is 156.5 mm (21.75 % displacement reduces compared to without any damping device). Figure 13 : displacement on model 4 In this thesis work, the maximum story displacement of different shaped buildings like square shaped, L-shaped Figure 14: Maximum displacement on model 2.2,3,4 damping device arranged at different configuration as Figure 16: Maximum story stiffness on model 2.2,3,4 Figure 15 : Maximum Story Drift on model 2.2,3,4 @ alternate story @ alternate exterior _malternate interior ™ without damper Figure 17: Maximum story force on model 2.2,3,4 IV.CONCLUSION
