Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 7 – uploaded by Giulia Pomaranzi

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 9: Comparison of mean and root mean square pressure coefficients, at 0 — 180°.

Figure 9 Comparison of mean and root mean square pressure coefficients, at 0 — 180°.

Related Figures (17)

Figure 2: Sketch of the building model.
Figure 2: Sketch of the building model.
Figure 4: Comparison of nondimensional mean velocity between PoliMi and WoW data.
Figure 4: Comparison of nondimensional mean velocity between PoliMi and WoW data.
Figure 6: Comparison of nondimensional integral time-scales between PoliMi and WoW data.
Figure 6: Comparison of nondimensional integral time-scales between PoliMi and WoW data.
Figure 7: Comparison of streamwise velocity spectra between PoliMi and WoW data at 0.67n height, compared to the Von-Karman spectrum adapted for wind engineering [28]
Figure 7: Comparison of streamwise velocity spectra between PoliMi and WoW data at 0.67n height, compared to the Von-Karman spectrum adapted for wind engineering [28]
Figure 8: Comparison of pressure coefficient first and second order statistics. Tiles on the right and on the left of each subplot refer to 0° and 180° wind directions respectively.
Figure 8: Comparison of pressure coefficient first and second order statistics. Tiles on the right and on the left of each subplot refer to 0° and 180° wind directions respectively.
Figure 11: Comparison of mean and root mean square pressure coefficients, at 20° wind directions.
Figure 11: Comparison of mean and root mean square pressure coefficients, at 20° wind directions.
Figure 13: Non-dimensional power spectral density of the pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner and mid-edge taps.
Figure 13: Non-dimensional power spectral density of the pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner and mid-edge taps.
Figure 14: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap. The red arrows indicate the negative peaks lower than Cp = —5
Figure 14: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap. The red arrows indicate the negative peaks lower than Cp = —5
Figure 15: Probability density functions of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction.
Figure 15: Probability density functions of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction.
Figure 17: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap, the red arrows indicate a negative peak lower than Cp = —5, and distribution of pressure coefficient around the tile at the time instant of the negative peak.
Figure 17: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap, the red arrows indicate a negative peak lower than Cp = —5, and distribution of pressure coefficient around the tile at the time instant of the negative peak.
Figure 18: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap, the red arrows indicate a negative peak lower than Cp = —5, and distribution of pressure coefficient around the tile at the time instant of the negative peak.
Figure 18: Time-series of pressure coefficient at 20° wind direction on top-corner tap, the red arrows indicate a negative peak lower than Cp = —5, and distribution of pressure coefficient around the tile at the time instant of the negative peak.
Figure 19: Comparison of peak pressure coefficients relative to a 22% probability of ex- ceedance, at 20° wind directions.
Figure 19: Comparison of peak pressure coefficients relative to a 22% probability of ex- ceedance, at 20° wind directions.
Figure 20: Design pressure coefficient for panels of increasing area, 20° wind direction..
Figure 20: Design pressure coefficient for panels of increasing area, 20° wind direction..
Related topics:
Mechanical EngineeringCivil Engineering
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved