Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Chia-Jeng Chen

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 1. 13 major watersheds (black boundaries with abbreviations near the outlets) of Taiwan and 28 upstream catchments (red shadings) eeu Nemes Sa ei: rede chew Figure 1. 13 major watersheds (black boundaries with abbreviations near the outlets) of Taiwan and 28 upstream catchments (red shadings)

Figure 1 13 major watersheds (black boundaries with abbreviations near the outlets) of Taiwan and 28 upstream catchments (red shadings) eeu Nemes Sa ei: rede chew Figure 1. 13 major watersheds (black boundaries with abbreviations near the outlets) of Taiwan and 28 upstream catchments (red shadings)

Related Figures (11)

Table 1. List of 14 climate indices used in this study.
Table 1. List of 14 climate indices used in this study.
+: Inside the parenthesis is the relative location of each watershed in Taiwan (NW: NorthWest; W: West; SW: SouthWest; SE: SouthEast; E: East; NE: NorthEast). : Lagged correlation is not available for the PJ index. significant at p = 0.05 are bold and italic).
+: Inside the parenthesis is the relative location of each watershed in Taiwan (NW: NorthWest; W: West; SW: SouthWest; SE: SouthEast; E: East; NE: NorthEast). : Lagged correlation is not available for the PJ index. significant at p = 0.05 are bold and italic).
Figure 3. As in Figure 2, but for lagged correlations.
Figure 3. As in Figure 2, but for lagged correlations.
Figure 4. Box plots of correlation values of upstream (left) and downstream (right) runoff with climate indices.
Figure 4. Box plots of correlation values of upstream (left) and downstream (right) runoff with climate indices.
Figure 5. Selected moving-window correlation time series.
Figure 5. Selected moving-window correlation time series.
Figure 7. Correlation maps of the PJ index before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom panels are PJ vs.
Figure 7. Correlation maps of the PJ index before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom panels are PJ vs.
Figure 8. Correlation maps of the East Taiwan runoff (ETWQ) before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom panels are ETWQ vs. SLP, ETWQ vs. ERSST, and ETWQ vs. GPCP data, respectively. Correlation values at a 5% significance level are stippled. Figure 8. Correlation maps of the East Taiwan runoff (ETWQ) before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom
Figure 8. Correlation maps of the East Taiwan runoff (ETWQ) before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom panels are ETWQ vs. SLP, ETWQ vs. ERSST, and ETWQ vs. GPCP data, respectively. Correlation values at a 5% significance level are stippled. Figure 8. Correlation maps of the East Taiwan runoff (ETWQ) before (left panel) and after (right panel) year 1999. Top, center, and bottom
Figure 9. Evolution of SSTA composites from 0- to 9-month lead times based on wet-minus-dry years for the JAS ETWQ before (left panel)
Figure 9. Evolution of SSTA composites from 0- to 9-month lead times based on wet-minus-dry years for the JAS ETWQ before (left panel)
Related topics:
Environmental ScienceClimatologyPacific Decadal Oscillation
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved