Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 5. (A) General overview of the mural painting from Thubchen Lakhang temple in Lo Manthang, Nepal. (B) Close-up of th green sampling area (East wall) before and after cleaning.  olenna 1s a natural variety of ochre whose colour has been stabilised and homogenised by burning the pigment at a relatively high temperature. The main ingredients in burnt sienna are iron oxide in the form of haematite (Fe2O3, 30-50%) and amorphous silica (10-30%) mixed with minor components of MnO,, Alumina, alkali, quartz and calcium carbonate, which are present in the range 1-10%.!° The Raman spectrum of burnt sienna, which is shown in Fig. 4(B), shows clearly the presence of haematite by bands at 225(Aj,), 299(E,), 410(E,) and 613 (E,) cm™’. It is a matter of debate as to whether another Raman band observed at 659 cm7! belongs to aniron impurity in the form of magnetite (Fe3O,) whose bands are known to be observed at 665 cm7! (Aig), 550 cm™! (To¢) and 310 cm™! (E,).7°?” The Raman band observed at 659 cm™! could then be attributed to magnetite; however, the expected magnetite bands at 550 and 310 cm7! (of medium and weak intensity, respectively) are not visible in our recorded Raman spectrum of burnt Sienna. Therefore, the opinion that the band at 659 cm™! can be attributed to a disorder band in the crystalline structure of haematite caused by exposure to high temperature during burning is more likely to be correct.”*”? Cao et al.8 speculated that the band at 659 cm7! can be attributed to the nanostructure of the a-Fe,O3, as the band changes drastically in intensity according to the source. This hypothesis is backed by Bersani et al.” who also mention the possibility of the band coming from a disorder-induced activation of a forbidden IR mode. The FIR spectrum has bands that clearly indicate the presence of haematite by bands at 262, 319, 393, 460 and 529 cm™!.°° In the MIR spectrum, the bands at 700, 779, 798 and 1084 cm7! can be attributed to quartz.'? Quartz is not observed in the Raman spectrum of Sienna. This can be due to the particle size being of approximately the same size as the spatial resolution of the Raman microscope, which means that in micro-Raman  Both the olive green pigment and the preparation layer are examined by FIR spectroscopy. Approximately 0.40 mg of the T2 olive green sample was ground and mixed with PE as described above in the experimental methods. Figure 6(A) shows the recorded FIR spectrum of the olive green pigment compared with an FIR spectrum of kaolinite, which has strong bands at 537, 470 and 432 cm7!. The kaolinite shown here has a high iron oxide content, as suggested by the FIR band at 393 cm™!, which is also present in our T2 sample. n the FIR spectrum of synthesised malachite, we observe strong bands at 525, 430 and 303 cm7!, which are all present in the T2 sample. The band at 430 cm7!, observed as a weak band in the T2 sample, is overlapping with the band from kaolin. Water or hydroxide bands are also present in the sample, as suggested by the multiple bands present in the 300-50 cm7! region of the FIR spectrum. These vibrational bands can be attributed to the hydroxide groups present in the malachite or also to air. In the same region, strong background absorption is visible, possibly due to instrument or environmental interference or other components not yet recorded in our FIR spectroscopic database. Small trace amounts of azurite, brochantite, calcite and vermilion are also expected in this sample as reported in the literature." Brochantite is not present in our FIR database, and although azurite, calcite and vermilion find place in it, their spectra do not correspond with the bands observed in our sample. We can conclude by FIR spectroscopic examination of our olive green T2 sample that it contains malachite and kaolinite with high iron oxide content.

Figure 5 (A) General overview of the mural painting from Thubchen Lakhang temple in Lo Manthang, Nepal. (B) Close-up of th green sampling area (East wall) before and after cleaning. olenna 1s a natural variety of ochre whose colour has been stabilised and homogenised by burning the pigment at a relatively high temperature. The main ingredients in burnt sienna are iron oxide in the form of haematite (Fe2O3, 30-50%) and amorphous silica (10-30%) mixed with minor components of MnO,, Alumina, alkali, quartz and calcium carbonate, which are present in the range 1-10%.!° The Raman spectrum of burnt sienna, which is shown in Fig. 4(B), shows clearly the presence of haematite by bands at 225(Aj,), 299(E,), 410(E,) and 613 (E,) cm™’. It is a matter of debate as to whether another Raman band observed at 659 cm7! belongs to aniron impurity in the form of magnetite (Fe3O,) whose bands are known to be observed at 665 cm7! (Aig), 550 cm™! (To¢) and 310 cm™! (E,).7°?” The Raman band observed at 659 cm™! could then be attributed to magnetite; however, the expected magnetite bands at 550 and 310 cm7! (of medium and weak intensity, respectively) are not visible in our recorded Raman spectrum of burnt Sienna. Therefore, the opinion that the band at 659 cm™! can be attributed to a disorder band in the crystalline structure of haematite caused by exposure to high temperature during burning is more likely to be correct.”*”? Cao et al.8 speculated that the band at 659 cm7! can be attributed to the nanostructure of the a-Fe,O3, as the band changes drastically in intensity according to the source. This hypothesis is backed by Bersani et al.” who also mention the possibility of the band coming from a disorder-induced activation of a forbidden IR mode. The FIR spectrum has bands that clearly indicate the presence of haematite by bands at 262, 319, 393, 460 and 529 cm™!.°° In the MIR spectrum, the bands at 700, 779, 798 and 1084 cm7! can be attributed to quartz.'? Quartz is not observed in the Raman spectrum of Sienna. This can be due to the particle size being of approximately the same size as the spatial resolution of the Raman microscope, which means that in micro-Raman Both the olive green pigment and the preparation layer are examined by FIR spectroscopy. Approximately 0.40 mg of the T2 olive green sample was ground and mixed with PE as described above in the experimental methods. Figure 6(A) shows the recorded FIR spectrum of the olive green pigment compared with an FIR spectrum of kaolinite, which has strong bands at 537, 470 and 432 cm7!. The kaolinite shown here has a high iron oxide content, as suggested by the FIR band at 393 cm™!, which is also present in our T2 sample. n the FIR spectrum of synthesised malachite, we observe strong bands at 525, 430 and 303 cm7!, which are all present in the T2 sample. The band at 430 cm7!, observed as a weak band in the T2 sample, is overlapping with the band from kaolin. Water or hydroxide bands are also present in the sample, as suggested by the multiple bands present in the 300-50 cm7! region of the FIR spectrum. These vibrational bands can be attributed to the hydroxide groups present in the malachite or also to air. In the same region, strong background absorption is visible, possibly due to instrument or environmental interference or other components not yet recorded in our FIR spectroscopic database. Small trace amounts of azurite, brochantite, calcite and vermilion are also expected in this sample as reported in the literature." Brochantite is not present in our FIR database, and although azurite, calcite and vermilion find place in it, their spectra do not correspond with the bands observed in our sample. We can conclude by FIR spectroscopic examination of our olive green T2 sample that it contains malachite and kaolinite with high iron oxide content.