Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Carlos Roberto Camello Lima

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
TABLE II. Monitoring of TPM pillar implementation and resulting OEE metric variation TABLE III. Big losses and the OEE element contributing to its improvement

Table 3 II. Monitoring of TPM pillar implementation and resulting OEE metric variation TABLE III. Big losses and the OEE element contributing to its improvement

Related Figures (9)

The work is predicated on the Survey method and was based on industrial companies chosen by convenience, operating in various sectors in Brazil that use the TPM method. Figure 2 summarizes the steps adopted in the research. The development of each step and the concepts used are presented in detail in the subsections. At the initial development of the pilot uestionnaire, three companies were chosen, that answered
The work is predicated on the Survey method and was based on industrial companies chosen by convenience, operating in various sectors in Brazil that use the TPM method. Figure 2 summarizes the steps adopted in the research. The development of each step and the concepts used are presented in detail in the subsections. At the initial development of the pilot uestionnaire, three companies were chosen, that answered
develop trainings and activities to act in the culture and raise employees’ awareness, performing activities to prevent accidents. For this reason, it is important to periodically inspect the equipment and facilities in relation to unsafe activities, and train the evacuation of the workplace in the event of fire [38]. Figure 1 shows the sequence of TPM pillars implementation suggested by several authors [1, 39]. Also, according to these authors, the pillars can be implemented simultaneously, considering their interrelation. Figure 1. Sequence proposed for TPM pillars’ implementation aa rs sgt gta 7.
develop trainings and activities to act in the culture and raise employees’ awareness, performing activities to prevent accidents. For this reason, it is important to periodically inspect the equipment and facilities in relation to unsafe activities, and train the evacuation of the workplace in the event of fire [38]. Figure 1 shows the sequence of TPM pillars implementation suggested by several authors [1, 39]. Also, according to these authors, the pillars can be implemented simultaneously, considering their interrelation. Figure 1. Sequence proposed for TPM pillars’ implementation aa rs sgt gta 7.
TABLE I: Comparison of the pillars implementation sequence suggested versus accomplished This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TABLE I: Comparison of the pillars implementation sequence suggested versus accomplished This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 3 brings the types of maintenance used by the companies. A balanced distribution can be observed among predictive, with 20%, preventive, 22.2%, planned corrective, 24.4% and unplanned corrective maintenance, 24.4%. It is emphasized that the expectation for the last type of maintenance is from a lower rate due to the expected technological evolution and the development of professionals in the implemented process.
Figure 3 brings the types of maintenance used by the companies. A balanced distribution can be observed among predictive, with 20%, preventive, 22.2%, planned corrective, 24.4% and unplanned corrective maintenance, 24.4%. It is emphasized that the expectation for the last type of maintenance is from a lower rate due to the expected technological evolution and the development of professionals in the implemented process.
Figure 5: Sequence of TPM pillars’ implementation. Figure 4: Incidence of implemented TPM pillars
Figure 5: Sequence of TPM pillars’ implementation. Figure 4: Incidence of implemented TPM pillars
Figure 5, the sequence in which the TPM pillars were implemented is presented.
Figure 5, the sequence in which the TPM pillars were implemented is presented.
rework, average index of 8.7% and drop in the startup performance, average index of 8.2%. Figure 6 shows the average distribution of the big losses with impact in the OEE elements, as follows: Availability, with average index of 45,9%, and in all of them, the larger contribution is on the reduction of equipment breakdown, average index of 10.5%, Downtime, average index of 10.5%, and MTTR (mean time to repair) 9.7%; Efficiency, large losses contributed to 33.9%, leading to a reduction of the numbers of accidents, average index of 10.5%; Quality, large losses contributed to 20.3%, in a balanced way, as: defective production or
rework, average index of 8.7% and drop in the startup performance, average index of 8.2%. Figure 6 shows the average distribution of the big losses with impact in the OEE elements, as follows: Availability, with average index of 45,9%, and in all of them, the larger contribution is on the reduction of equipment breakdown, average index of 10.5%, Downtime, average index of 10.5%, and MTTR (mean time to repair) 9.7%; Efficiency, large losses contributed to 33.9%, leading to a reduction of the numbers of accidents, average index of 10.5%; Quality, large losses contributed to 20.3%, in a balanced way, as: defective production or
www.ijemr.net Figure 6: Average distribution of the big losses with impact in the OEE elements.
www.ijemr.net Figure 6: Average distribution of the big losses with impact in the OEE elements.
Related topics:
BusinessSocial Science Research Network
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved