Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by George Ghinea

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
E61 S60 3rd edition running Symbian 9.1 operating system. The third device, also used by meeting partici- pants, was a first generation Apple iPhone operating system v3.1.3. The final device, also used by the meeting participants, was an HTC TYTN II device, running Micro- soft Windows Mobile 6.1 operating system. The server equipment included in this user evaluation was an Apple MacBook Pro with 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of DDR2 SDRAM. This machine was used for background tasks such as scanning for meeting participants and ena- bling the registration server services. In addition to the material described, we took advantage of the Google Cloud by deploying our backend application to a cloud computer service at the Google App Engine. The overall distribution of participants for a particular device is given in Table I.

Figure 2 E61 S60 3rd edition running Symbian 9.1 operating system. The third device, also used by meeting partici- pants, was a first generation Apple iPhone operating system v3.1.3. The final device, also used by the meeting participants, was an HTC TYTN II device, running Micro- soft Windows Mobile 6.1 operating system. The server equipment included in this user evaluation was an Apple MacBook Pro with 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of DDR2 SDRAM. This machine was used for background tasks such as scanning for meeting participants and ena- bling the registration server services. In addition to the material described, we took advantage of the Google Cloud by deploying our backend application to a cloud computer service at the Google App Engine. The overall distribution of participants for a particular device is given in Table I.

Related Figures (7)

Figure 1. Application component architecture
Figure 1. Application component architecture
participants was not the focus of the exercise, with partici- pants being made aware that their skills/ability to interact with the device was not the issue.
participants was not the focus of the exercise, with partici- pants being made aware that their skills/ability to interact with the device was not the issue.
F. Analysis
F. Analysis
Figure 5. Context-aware Information results
Figure 5. Context-aware Information results
MOBILITY, CONTEXT AND CLOUD — EXPLORING INTEGRATION ISSUES IN A MEETING ROOM SCENARIO In statements 13 and 14 the applicability of the applica- tion in a meeting room setting was tested. As expected from the answers collected in the pilot evaluation, the application is per se identified as useful. However, the ability to receive more complex data such as images and its likes is highly wished for. We acknowledge this de- mand and think it could be a useful extension to further improve the usefulness of the application and thereby broaden its’ acceptance.
MOBILITY, CONTEXT AND CLOUD — EXPLORING INTEGRATION ISSUES IN A MEETING ROOM SCENARIO In statements 13 and 14 the applicability of the applica- tion in a meeting room setting was tested. As expected from the answers collected in the pilot evaluation, the application is per se identified as useful. However, the ability to receive more complex data such as images and its likes is highly wished for. We acknowledge this de- mand and think it could be a useful extension to further improve the usefulness of the application and thereby broaden its’ acceptance.
Figure 7. Overall Impression results
Figure 7. Overall Impression results
Related topics:
Distributed Computing
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved