Figure 1: How Would You Rate the Workshop Overall (n=14) Education. The majority of respondent, 35.7% (n=5), work with High School students. The educators, understanding the purpose of presented activities, and their ability to apply workshop remaining 64.3% (n=9), work with a combination of Elementary, Middle, High School, Higher Figure 2: Race/Ethnicity of Workshop Participants (n=13) Figure 5: Activity A - Scenario 1 Themes for Activity B. For those focused on scenario 1, some of the key themes were the need to In the post-session survey, participants were asked about their attitudes around sex navigation, ability to collaborate and participant reference to lecture content and their own the same observation rubric, and they noted common themes such as ease of Jam board framework in their work with youth. Participants were asked to record their opinions about sex education in K-12 before and after the workshop. Before the workshop, 38.5% of survey Figure 10: Confidence in Supporting Students’ Sex Education Before the Workshop ® Very confident ® Slightly confident ® Completely confident ® Moderately confident 'Agreed" that one workshop was enough, 28.6% of respondents "Disagreed" (n=4). Thi response was further validated in the qualitative responses. Participants were asked to name wha' could be improved and participants noted a non-active breakout room and more workshops. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / NOTES: What is this pedagogy at it's core and how can | apply it? What does this framework look like in action? : hooks' notion of Social Justice
