Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Hafizullah Dar

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
The Table-! is the clear about the demographic profile of the respondents. The highest respondents (30%) are from age group of 26 to 40 years followed by age group of 46 to 55 years (28.3%), less than 25 years (23.3%) and of above the 56 years (18.3%). Mostly, the budget class tourists have used the houseboat services as the 33.3% respondents have annual income less than Rs 1.5 lacs followed by the annual income Rs 1.5 to 3 lacs of 30% respondents, Rs 3 to 4.5 lakh of 15% respondents, Rs 4.5 to 6 lacs of 15% respondents and only 6.7% have more than Rs 6 lacs annual income. The highest percentage of respondents is of postgraduates (35%) while as only 3.3% having more than P.G qualifications. 38.3% are graduates and 18.3% are undergraduates, moreover, 5% respondents have up to 10+2 level qualifications. Talking about the occupations of respondents, majority of respondents are involved in government service (31.7%) and in business (31.7%) activities followed by agriculture (20%), self-employment (13.3%) and study (3.3%). In this study, the mail respondents are 78.3% and only 21.7% are females. In addition to this, 78.3% respondents are married and 21.7% are unmarried. The percentage of domestic respondents (73.3%) is high as compare to foreign respondents (26.7%) in this study. TABLE 1: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS

Table 1 The Table-! is the clear about the demographic profile of the respondents. The highest respondents (30%) are from age group of 26 to 40 years followed by age group of 46 to 55 years (28.3%), less than 25 years (23.3%) and of above the 56 years (18.3%). Mostly, the budget class tourists have used the houseboat services as the 33.3% respondents have annual income less than Rs 1.5 lacs followed by the annual income Rs 1.5 to 3 lacs of 30% respondents, Rs 3 to 4.5 lakh of 15% respondents, Rs 4.5 to 6 lacs of 15% respondents and only 6.7% have more than Rs 6 lacs annual income. The highest percentage of respondents is of postgraduates (35%) while as only 3.3% having more than P.G qualifications. 38.3% are graduates and 18.3% are undergraduates, moreover, 5% respondents have up to 10+2 level qualifications. Talking about the occupations of respondents, majority of respondents are involved in government service (31.7%) and in business (31.7%) activities followed by agriculture (20%), self-employment (13.3%) and study (3.3%). In this study, the mail respondents are 78.3% and only 21.7% are females. In addition to this, 78.3% respondents are married and 21.7% are unmarried. The percentage of domestic respondents (73.3%) is high as compare to foreign respondents (26.7%) in this study. TABLE 1: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS

Related Figures (16)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMPUTER APPLICATION & MANAGEMENT FIGURES & TABLES: These should be simple, crystal clear, centered, separately numbered & self explained, and titles must be above the table/figure. Sources of data should be mentioned below the table/figure. It should be ensured that the tables/figures are referred to from the main text. ABSTRACT: Abstract should be in fully italicized text, not exceeding 250 words. The abstract must be informative and explain the background, aims, methods, results & conclusion in a single para. Abbreviations must be mentioned in full.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMPUTER APPLICATION & MANAGEMENT FIGURES & TABLES: These should be simple, crystal clear, centered, separately numbered & self explained, and titles must be above the table/figure. Sources of data should be mentioned below the table/figure. It should be ensured that the tables/figures are referred to from the main text. ABSTRACT: Abstract should be in fully italicized text, not exceeding 250 words. The abstract must be informative and explain the background, aims, methods, results & conclusion in a single para. Abbreviations must be mentioned in full.
TABLE-2: BEFORE VISITING KASHMIR, HOUSEBOAT WAS IN MIND 43.3% respondents are agree with the statement that before visiting to Kashmir houseboat was in their minds followed by 41.7% respondents who are strongly agree with same statement. 6.7% are neutral and 8.3% are strongly dis-agreed with this statement. Overall satisfaction level of respondents is quite high.
TABLE-2: BEFORE VISITING KASHMIR, HOUSEBOAT WAS IN MIND 43.3% respondents are agree with the statement that before visiting to Kashmir houseboat was in their minds followed by 41.7% respondents who are strongly agree with same statement. 6.7% are neutral and 8.3% are strongly dis-agreed with this statement. Overall satisfaction level of respondents is quite high.
Talking about the efficiency of washroom, toilet points, water etc facilities, the 56.7% respondents are agree and 8.3% respondents are strongly agree with it. The 18.3% respondents are neutral and 10% respondents are disagree, while as 6.7% respondents are strongly disagree with this statement. 51.7% respondents are agreeing with that the behavior of service providers is appreciable and 35% respondents are strongly agreed with the same statement. The 10 % respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are neutral in this statement. TABLE-8: HYGIENIC FOOD QUALITY IN HOUSEBOATS
Talking about the efficiency of washroom, toilet points, water etc facilities, the 56.7% respondents are agree and 8.3% respondents are strongly agree with it. The 18.3% respondents are neutral and 10% respondents are disagree, while as 6.7% respondents are strongly disagree with this statement. 51.7% respondents are agreeing with that the behavior of service providers is appreciable and 35% respondents are strongly agreed with the same statement. The 10 % respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are neutral in this statement. TABLE-8: HYGIENIC FOOD QUALITY IN HOUSEBOATS
Maximum number of respondents (50%) is agreeing that houseboat rooms are efficient and 18.3% respondents are strongly agreed with the above statement. The 23.3% respondents are neutral with the same statement and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagree while as 5% respondents are disagree with this statement.
Maximum number of respondents (50%) is agreeing that houseboat rooms are efficient and 18.3% respondents are strongly agreed with the above statement. The 23.3% respondents are neutral with the same statement and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagree while as 5% respondents are disagree with this statement.
The 48.3% respondents are agreeing that communication facilities are better in houseboats followed by the 11.7% of strongly agreed respondents. The 23.3% respondents are neutral in this statement. The 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing and 13.3% disagree respondents with the said statement. TABLE-5: SERVICES IN HOUSEBOATS WERE PROVIDED IN KASHMIRI STYLE
The 48.3% respondents are agreeing that communication facilities are better in houseboats followed by the 11.7% of strongly agreed respondents. The 23.3% respondents are neutral in this statement. The 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing and 13.3% disagree respondents with the said statement. TABLE-5: SERVICES IN HOUSEBOATS WERE PROVIDED IN KASHMIRI STYLE
The highest number of respondents (48.3%) are agree with the that they were served in Kashmiri traditional way, while as the 11.7% respondents are stro agree with the same statement. 18.3% respondents are neutral about this statement. The 3.3% respondents are strongly disagree and 18.3% are disagree | this statement.
The highest number of respondents (48.3%) are agree with the that they were served in Kashmiri traditional way, while as the 11.7% respondents are stro agree with the same statement. 18.3% respondents are neutral about this statement. The 3.3% respondents are strongly disagree and 18.3% are disagree | this statement.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMPUTER APPLICATION & MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMPUTER APPLICATION & MANAGEMENT
The maximum percentage of respondents (46.7%) are strongly agree that they will suggest the house boat accommodation to others in Kashmir and again the 41.7% respondents are agree with the same statement, only 6.7% respondents are disagree and 5% respondents are neutral in this statement. The response of respondents shows that tourists are satisfy with services of houseboats hence they want to suggest the houseboats to others.
The maximum percentage of respondents (46.7%) are strongly agree that they will suggest the house boat accommodation to others in Kashmir and again the 41.7% respondents are agree with the same statement, only 6.7% respondents are disagree and 5% respondents are neutral in this statement. The response of respondents shows that tourists are satisfy with services of houseboats hence they want to suggest the houseboats to others.
TABLE-9: REASONABLE CHARGES FOR HOUSEBOATS SERVICES 55% respondents are agree that they are charge reasonable for houseboat services and 15% respondents are strongly agree for the same statement. 13.3% respondents are neither agree nor disagree in this case. The 13.3% respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing with this statement. The 41.7% respondents are agreeing with the hygienic food quality in houseboats and 18.3% respondents are strongly agreed with the same statement. The 31.7% respondents are neither agree nor disagree and only 8.3% respondents are disagree with the said statement. TABLE-10: STAYING IN A HOUSEBOAT WAS CURIOSITY
TABLE-9: REASONABLE CHARGES FOR HOUSEBOATS SERVICES 55% respondents are agree that they are charge reasonable for houseboat services and 15% respondents are strongly agree for the same statement. 13.3% respondents are neither agree nor disagree in this case. The 13.3% respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing with this statement. The 41.7% respondents are agreeing with the hygienic food quality in houseboats and 18.3% respondents are strongly agreed with the same statement. The 31.7% respondents are neither agree nor disagree and only 8.3% respondents are disagree with the said statement. TABLE-10: STAYING IN A HOUSEBOAT WAS CURIOSITY
65% respondents are agreeing with the statement that ‘staying in a houseboat was curiosity’. Followed by the strongly satisfied 21.7% respondents, while a 10% are neutral and 3.3% are disagreeing with this statement. Overall, there is sufficient support and positive perception of respondents towards thi houseboats.
65% respondents are agreeing with the statement that ‘staying in a houseboat was curiosity’. Followed by the strongly satisfied 21.7% respondents, while a 10% are neutral and 3.3% are disagreeing with this statement. Overall, there is sufficient support and positive perception of respondents towards thi houseboats.
The 25% respondents are agreeing that they are satisfied with the experience of houseboat services and 13.7% respondents are strongly agree with the same statement. The 13.3% respondents are neither agree nor disagree with houseboat experience. The 10% respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing with above mentioned statement. The houseboats are not getting here much positive responses from respondents in the statement ‘if houseboats no more exist in Kashmir, would have reconsidered decision’. 41.7% are disagree with this statement and 21.7% are neutral about it; only 30% are agree and 6.7% are strongly agree with same statement. CONCLUSION
The 25% respondents are agreeing that they are satisfied with the experience of houseboat services and 13.7% respondents are strongly agree with the same statement. The 13.3% respondents are neither agree nor disagree with houseboat experience. The 10% respondents are disagreeing and 3.3% respondents are strongly disagreeing with above mentioned statement. The houseboats are not getting here much positive responses from respondents in the statement ‘if houseboats no more exist in Kashmir, would have reconsidered decision’. 41.7% are disagree with this statement and 21.7% are neutral about it; only 30% are agree and 6.7% are strongly agree with same statement. CONCLUSION
The information and opinions presented in the Journal reflect the views of the authors and not of thi Journal or its Editorial Board or the Publishers/Editors. Publication does not constitute endorsement by th journal. Neither the Journal nor its publishers/Editors/Editorial Board nor anyone else involved in creating producing or delivering the journal or the materials contained therein, assumes any liability o responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information provided in the journal, no shall they be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages arisin out of the use of information/material contained in the journal. The journal, nor its publishers/Editors Editorial Board, nor any other party involved in the preparation of material contained in the journée represents or warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, an they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of sucl material. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources. Thi responsibility of the contents and the opinions expressed in this journal is exclusively of the author (s concerned.
The information and opinions presented in the Journal reflect the views of the authors and not of thi Journal or its Editorial Board or the Publishers/Editors. Publication does not constitute endorsement by th journal. Neither the Journal nor its publishers/Editors/Editorial Board nor anyone else involved in creating producing or delivering the journal or the materials contained therein, assumes any liability o responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information provided in the journal, no shall they be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages arisin out of the use of information/material contained in the journal. The journal, nor its publishers/Editors Editorial Board, nor any other party involved in the preparation of material contained in the journée represents or warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, an they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of sucl material. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources. Thi responsibility of the contents and the opinions expressed in this journal is exclusively of the author (s concerned.
Related topics:
PsychologyPerception
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved