Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Gene Jan

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
COMPARISON OF VARIOUS ALGORITHMS IN COMPLETE COVERAGE NAVIGATION OF A MOBILE ROBOT

Table 1 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS ALGORITHMS IN COMPLETE COVERAGE NAVIGATION OF A MOBILE ROBOT

Related Figures (5)

Fig. 1 The vertical cell decomposition. A: Sweep line for the cell decomposition; B: The possible planned robot trajectory in the roadmap [25]. Initialization of each critical point of obstacles in the configuration workspace;
Fig. 1 The vertical cell decomposition. A: Sweep line for the cell decomposition; B: The possible planned robot trajectory in the roadmap [25]. Initialization of each critical point of obstacles in the configuration workspace;
Fig. 2 Illustration of a convex hull and convex polygon
Fig. 2 Illustration of a convex hull and convex polygon
yee eee Fig. 4 Illustration of the detailed motion planning of adjacency graph GT’. A: Degree = 1; B: Degree = 2; C: Degree = 3. Fig. 3 Illustration of detailed motion planning of adjacency graph G°. A: Degree = 2; B: Degree = 3.
yee eee Fig. 4 Illustration of the detailed motion planning of adjacency graph GT’. A: Degree = 1; B: Degree = 2; C: Degree = 3. Fig. 3 Illustration of detailed motion planning of adjacency graph G°. A: Degree = 2; B: Degree = 3.
The CAC algorithm with several steps described above is depicted in Figure 5.
The CAC algorithm with several steps described above is depicted in Figure 5.
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved