Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 26 – uploaded by Ahmed Mosa

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure (3.5): Network topology for fidelity testing

Figure 26 (3.5): Network topology for fidelity testing

Related Figures (71)

Figure (2.2): Architecture for 2D underwater sensor networks [2].
Figure (2.2): Architecture for 2D underwater sensor networks [2].
Figure (2.9): HH-V BF with per-hop vector computing.
Figure (2.9): HH-V BF with per-hop vector computing.
Figure (2.12): Input- output map for the river water quality problem in a fuzzy inference system. Figure (2.12): Input- output map for the river water quality problem in a fuzzy
Figure (2.12): Input- output map for the river water quality problem in a fuzzy inference system. Figure (2.12): Input- output map for the river water quality problem in a fuzzy
Figure (3.6): Throughput with fixe input traffic per node
Figure (3.6): Throughput with fixe input traffic per node
Figure (3.7): Throughput with fixed total input traffic
Figure (3.7): Throughput with fixed total input traffic
Table (3.1): Simulation Parameters of MAC Protocols Test
Table (3.1): Simulation Parameters of MAC Protocols Test
Figure (3.8): Simulation Scenario of MAC Protocol Test
Figure (3.8): Simulation Scenario of MAC Protocol Test
Figure (3.11): Average End To End Delay of UWSN MAC Protocols
Figure (3.11): Average End To End Delay of UWSN MAC Protocols
Figure (3.12): Total Drop Packets of UWSN MAC Protocols
Figure (3.12): Total Drop Packets of UWSN MAC Protocols
lable (3.3) Simulation Parameters of Routing Protocols Test
lable (3.3) Simulation Parameters of Routing Protocols Test
Figure (3.13): Packet Delivery Ratio of UWSN Routing Protocols
Figure (3.13): Packet Delivery Ratio of UWSN Routing Protocols
Figure (3.15): Energy Consumption of UWSN Routing Protocols
Figure (3.15): Energy Consumption of UWSN Routing Protocols
Figure (3.17): Total Drop Packets of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (3.17): Total Drop Packets of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (3.18): Average End to End Delay of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (3.18): Average End to End Delay of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (3.20): Received Throughput of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (3.20): Received Throughput of UWSN in Final Design
Figure (4.2): Fuzzy language Rules for the inputs PH and DO.
Figure (4.2): Fuzzy language Rules for the inputs PH and DO.
Figure (4.4): A surface graph representing the interactions between DO, PH and the final index value.
Figure (4.4): A surface graph representing the interactions between DO, PH and the final index value.
Figure (4.6): Comparative between indexes in June 2007
Figure (4.6): Comparative between indexes in June 2007
€} Applications Places System @¢ % ahmed mosa Sun Jun 23, 1:47 AM 4) After this we will get the following trace file (some rows as example):-
€} Applications Places System @¢ % ahmed mosa Sun Jun 23, 1:47 AM 4) After this we will get the following trace file (some rows as example):-
b) Execute the TCL file that contained the final design program and all simulation parameters. ®& ahmed mosa Sun Jun 23, 1:45AM q)E
b) Execute the TCL file that contained the final design program and all simulation parameters. ®& ahmed mosa Sun Jun 23, 1:45AM q)E
d) To compute any operation or parameters test using the AWK short script to get result that shown in previous section.
d) To compute any operation or parameters test using the AWK short script to get result that shown in previous section.
Also example of other parameters result:-
Also example of other parameters result:-
Table (3.2): simulation result of UWSN MAC -protocols
Table (3.2): simulation result of UWSN MAC -protocols
Related topics:
Underwater AcousticsUnderwater Communication
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved