Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Fig. 3. Typical cross-sections (a) just downstream of the breached dike toe and (b) 50 m downstream of the dam showing the pre-flood and post flood channel morphology and the peak water level. Bed and bank erosion from the dam-break flood increased the cross-sections by 60% on average.  Rectified aerial photographs at a scale of 1:5000 aided in locating specific areas that experienced significant morphologic change (e.g. considerable scour and deposition) that were of special interest and in delineating the flooded areas (Fig. 1b). Eye-witness reports of local res- idents and professional engineering personnel completed the real-time visual scenario which was later verified in the field by ground surveying and additional photography.  In the laboratory, the samples were oven-dried at 105 °C, mechani- cally disaggregated and sieved using sieves with meshes of 0.063, 0.106, 0.145, 0.250, 0.354, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 4.75 and 8.0 mm for the bank loess, present channel bed and pre-flood soil. For the alluvial fan deposit the sieves used were 0.063, 0.075, 0.180, 0.425, 0.850, 2.0, 4.75 and 8 mm. For all samples grain size distributions (GSDs) were produced using

Figure 3 Typical cross-sections (a) just downstream of the breached dike toe and (b) 50 m downstream of the dam showing the pre-flood and post flood channel morphology and the peak water level. Bed and bank erosion from the dam-break flood increased the cross-sections by 60% on average. Rectified aerial photographs at a scale of 1:5000 aided in locating specific areas that experienced significant morphologic change (e.g. considerable scour and deposition) that were of special interest and in delineating the flooded areas (Fig. 1b). Eye-witness reports of local res- idents and professional engineering personnel completed the real-time visual scenario which was later verified in the field by ground surveying and additional photography. In the laboratory, the samples were oven-dried at 105 °C, mechani- cally disaggregated and sieved using sieves with meshes of 0.063, 0.106, 0.145, 0.250, 0.354, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 4.75 and 8.0 mm for the bank loess, present channel bed and pre-flood soil. For the alluvial fan deposit the sieves used were 0.063, 0.075, 0.180, 0.425, 0.850, 2.0, 4.75 and 8 mm. For all samples grain size distributions (GSDs) were produced using