Figure 91 – uploaded by Ibrahem Maher

See full PDF downloadDownload figure

Figure 6.31 The variation of normal force against rotational speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.3 mm. — Figure 6 31 The variation of normal force against rotational speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.3 mm.

Related Figures (142)

Figure 2.3 plan view of a conventional turning process with feed marks

or lead angel.

If the feed is larger than 2t,sinC, (Case I in Figure 2.5), the ideal peak-to- finishing it is approximately

Figure 2.7 Formation of the Built-up edge

Figure 3.3 ANFIS architecture for a two-input Sugeno fuzzy model. For explain this model simply, we have assumed only two rules, and two ANFIS architecture is shown in Figure 3.3. Five network layers are used by

Table 3.1 Measured Ra in microns (training data set)

Table 3.2 Measured Ra in microns (testing data set)

Figure 3.4 loading the training data set

Figure 3.8 Fuzzy rules properties

Figure 3.10 Training error curve of modeling Ra for trimf using 100 epochs.

Figure 3.13 Training error curve of modeling Ra for gaussmf using 100

Figure 3.14 Training error curve of modeling Ra for pimf using 100 epochs.

Figure 3.15 Training error curve of modeling Ra for dsigmf using 100 epochs. Training Error Figure 3.16 Training error curve of modeling Ra for psigmf using 100 epochs.

Training Error - The difference between two sigmoid memberships function (dsigmf) gives a

Figure 3.19 Initial and final membership function of depth of cut.

Figure 3.21 The rule viewer of fuzzy toolbox of Matlab program of modeling Ra.

Figure 4.1 ProLight2000 CNC end milling machine.

Figure 4.2 Stylus-based profilometer.

Figure 4.6 Strain distributions using finite element simulation

Figure 4.9 The end milling dynamometer

Figure 4.10 Assembly drawing of the milling dynamometer.

Table 4.1 parts list of the milling dynamometer.

Table 5.1 Measured feed force and normal force (training data set)

Table 5.2 Measured feed force and normal force (testing data set)

Figure 5.2 Training error curve of modeling Ra for trapmf using 100 epochs.

Figure 5.5 Training error curve of modeling Ra for pimf using 100 epochs.

Figure 5.6 Training error curve of modeling Ra for dsigmf using 100 epochs.

Figure 5.8 Initial and final membership function of normal force.

Figure 6.1 The variation of surface roughness against speed at different feed

Figure 6.2 The variation of surface roughness against speed at different feed

Figure 6.3 The variation of surface roughness against speed at different feed

Figure 6.4 The variation of surface roughness against feed rate at different

Figure 6.5 The variation of surface roughness against feed rate at different

Figure 6.6 The variation of surface roughness against feed rate at different speed for depth of cut = 0.7 mm Figure 6.6 The variation of surface roughness against feed rate at different

Figure 6.7 The variation of surface roughness against speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.3 mm Figure 6.7 The variation of surface roughness against speed and feed rate for

Figure 6.9 the variation of surface roughness against speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.7 mm Figure 6.9 the variation of surface roughness against speed and feed rate for

Figure 6.10 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 50 mm/min Figure 6.10 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at

Figure 6.11 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at

Figure 6.12 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at

‘igure 6.13 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut a different speed for feed rate = 200 mm/min Figure 6.13 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at

Figure 6.14 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut j different speed for feed rate = 250 mm/min Figure 6.14 The variation of surface roughness against depth of cut at

Figure 6.16 The variation of feed force against speed at different feed rate for

Figure 6.17 The variation of feed force against speed at different feed rate for depth of cut = 0.5 mm. Figure 6.17 The variation of feed force against speed at different feed rate for

Figure 6.18 The variation of feed force against speed at different feed rate for

Figure 6.20 The variation of normal force against speed at different feed rate for depth of cut = 0.5 mm. Figure 6.20 The variation of normal force against speed at different feed rate

Figure 6.21 The variation of normal force against speed at different feed rate for depth of cut = 0.7 mm. Figure 6.21 The variation of normal force against speed at different feed rate

Figure 6.22 The variation of feed force against feed rate at different speed for

Figure 6.23 The variation of feed force against feed rate at different speed for

Figure 6.24 The variation of feed force against feed rate at different speed for depth of cut = 0.7 mm. Figure 6.24 The variation of feed force against feed rate at different speed for

Figure 6.26 The variation of normal force against feed rate at different speed for danth of cut —0.5 mm. Figure 6.26 The variation of normal force against feed rate at different speed

Figure 6.27 The variation of normal force against feed rate at different speed

Figure 6.28 The variation of feed force against rotational speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.3 mm. Figure 6.28 The variation of feed force against rotational speed and feed ra

Figure 6.29 The variation of feed force against rotational speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.5 mm.

Figure 6.32 The variation of normal force against rotational speed and feed rate for depth of cut = 0.5 mm. Figure 6.32 The variation of normal force against rotational speed and feed

Figure 6.34 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed

Figure 6.35 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 100 mm/min. Figure 6.35 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed

Figure 6.36 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 150 mm/min. Figure 6.36 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed

Figure 6.37 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed

Figure 6.38 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed fan Fnanand natn — JRN mm/min Figure 6.38 The variation of feed force against depth of cut at different speed

Figure 6.39 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 50 mm/min. Figure 6.39 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different

Figure 6.40 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different

Figure 6.41 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 150 mm/min. Figure 6.41 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different

Figure 6.42 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 200 mm/min. Figure 6.42 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different

Figure 6.43 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different speed for feed rate = 250 mm/min. Figure 6.43 The variation of normal force against depth of cut at different

Figure 6.44 The variation of feed force against rotational speed and dept of cut for feed rate = 150 mm/min. Figure 6.44 The variation of feed force against rotational speed and dept of

Figure 6.45 The variation of normal force against rotational speed and depth of cut for feed rate = 150 mm/min.

Figure 6.47 Measured Ra versus predicted Ra

Table 6.1 Comparison of measured Ra and predicted Ra.

Figure 2 Elements and resultant unevenness of surface: | - shape flaw; 2 -

Figure 3 The average roughness, Ra.

Figure 5 Three surfaces all have the same Ra and similar shapes of the

Figure 6 The maximum height of the profile, Rt

Where Rvi is the depth of the deepest valley in the i-th sample length and Rtt is

Figure 7 Roughness height, Rz(ISO) depth within a sampling length, as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 8 Third highest peaks to third lowest valley height The parameter R3zi is the height from the third highest peak to the third lowest R3zi - Third Highest Peak to Third Lowest Valley Height

order to be counted, as shown in Figure 9. line. A peak must cross above the upper threshold and below the lower threshold 1

Figure 10 Peak count versus threshold for a ground surface and a turned surface parameter shows no stability. For the turned surface there is a bit of flattening out

Figure 12 Mean spacing, Sm

parameter such as Ra is probably not adequate to characterize the quality of th

Figure 15 Physical Significance of the bearing ratio curve of a surface lies at a given height) as shown in Figure 15. a profile lies above a certain height (compared to the ADF which tells how much

down from the mean line of the roughness profile.

Figure 20 Gaussian probability scales