Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Michael Domjan

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 1. Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods for groups L, T-C, T-NoC and UP during acquisition and extinction in Experiment | (sexual conditioning). The CS was a light for group L and a terrycloth object for groups T-C, T-NoC and UP. Subjects in group T-C copulated with the terrycloth CS, whereas those in groups L and T-NoC did not show conditioned copulatory behavior. F. Koksal et al. / Behaviour Research and Therapy 42 (2004) 1421-1434

Figure 1 Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods for groups L, T-C, T-NoC and UP during acquisition and extinction in Experiment | (sexual conditioning). The CS was a light for group L and a terrycloth object for groups T-C, T-NoC and UP. Subjects in group T-C copulated with the terrycloth CS, whereas those in groups L and T-NoC did not show conditioned copulatory behavior. F. Koksal et al. / Behaviour Research and Therapy 42 (2004) 1421-1434

Related Figures (2)

Fig. 2. Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods during acquisition and extinction in Experi- ment 2 (food conditioning). The CS was a light for group L and a terrycloth object for group T. F. K6ksal et al. / Behaviour Research and Therapy 42 (2004) 1421-1434
Fig. 2. Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods during acquisition and extinction in Experi- ment 2 (food conditioning). The CS was a light for group L and a terrycloth object for group T. F. K6ksal et al. / Behaviour Research and Therapy 42 (2004) 1421-1434
Fig. 3. Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods in acquisition and extinction in Experiment 3 for groups T-C and T-NoC. The CS was the terrycloth object in phases 1 and 4 and the light in phases 2 and 3. MAMMA ALLIW TLL. Groups T-C showed stronger acquisition of the approach response to the terrycloth CS in phase | than group T-NoC. A repeated measures ANOVA across all 30 trials of phase 1 showed a significant main effect of group, F(1, 20) = 12.94, p < 0.01, a significant effect of trials, F (6,20) = 18.3, and a_ significant group x trial interaction, F(6,20) = 2.87, ps < 0.05. Conditioned copulatory behavior emerged between trials 15 and 20 in group T-C, shortly after these subjects began spending more time near the terrycloth CS than group T-NoC.
Fig. 3. Mean seconds spent in the CS zone during the 30 s CS periods in acquisition and extinction in Experiment 3 for groups T-C and T-NoC. The CS was the terrycloth object in phases 1 and 4 and the light in phases 2 and 3. MAMMA ALLIW TLL. Groups T-C showed stronger acquisition of the approach response to the terrycloth CS in phase | than group T-NoC. A repeated measures ANOVA across all 30 trials of phase 1 showed a significant main effect of group, F(1, 20) = 12.94, p < 0.01, a significant effect of trials, F (6,20) = 18.3, and a_ significant group x trial interaction, F(6,20) = 2.87, ps < 0.05. Conditioned copulatory behavior emerged between trials 15 and 20 in group T-C, shortly after these subjects began spending more time near the terrycloth CS than group T-NoC.
Related topics:
PsychologyBusiness and ManagementJapanese QuailBehavioral Animal ModelsBehaviour Therapy
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved