Table 3 Rawic ibe Descriptive statistics and correlations
Related Figures (3)
Downloaded by Sam Houston State University At 08:02 10 February 2015 (PT) Notes: “p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; coefficient a representing scale reliabilities are in parentheses Regression was used to test the causal relationships between variables, as job-induced tension was a dichotomous measure. Results are listed in Tables ITI and IV. The first hypothesis, 11a, stated that there is a positive relationship between need for power and WIF. The results support this hypothesis (/ = 8.81, p < 0.01). Two per cent of the variance in work/family conflict is explained by need for power. H1b stated that there is a positive relationship between need for power and FIW. This hypothesis was not supported (F = 1.48, p < 0.28). 2a \ooks at the relationship between need for achievement and WIF. Data results show a significant positive relationship between these two variables (F = 7.24, p < 0.01), with explained variance being relatively low (R? = 0.02). H2b stating that there is a positive relationship between need for achievement and FIW was not supported (F = 0.15, p < 0.70). The third hypothesis stated that there is a positive relationship between need for affiliation and the two types of conflict between work and family. Whereas 13a, which looked at the relationship between need for affiliation and WIF was not supported (F = 3.41, p < 0.07), H3), did show a significant positive correlation between need for affiliation and FIW (F = 6.35, p < 0.01). In summary, results of the first three hypotheses show that there are significant positive relationships between:
