Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Martin Heimann

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 5. Model mean estimated flux, total prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for selected ocean regions. Numerical estimate of annual mean flux and total uncertainty is provided in each figure. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.

Figure 5 Model mean estimated flux, total prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for selected ocean regions. Numerical estimate of annual mean flux and total uncertainty is provided in each figure. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.

Related Figures (15)

Figure 1. Zonal mean monthly predicted concentration driven by the background fluxes (fossil fuel, seasonally balanced biosphere exchange, ocean exchange) for each of the participating tracer transport models. See color version of this figure at back of this issue.
Figure 1. Zonal mean monthly predicted concentration driven by the background fluxes (fossil fuel, seasonally balanced biosphere exchange, ocean exchange) for each of the participating tracer transport models. See color version of this figure at back of this issue.
Figure 2. Simulated background seasonal amplitude versus the observed amplitude at stations north of 35°N. Amplitude is defined as the mean October—March concentration minus the mean June—August concentration. The station average simulated values are provided in the legend. The observed station average is 5.6 ppm. A one-to-one line is included. See color version of this figure at back of this issue.
Figure 2. Simulated background seasonal amplitude versus the observed amplitude at stations north of 35°N. Amplitude is defined as the mean October—March concentration minus the mean June—August concentration. The station average simulated values are provided in the legend. The observed station average is 5.6 ppm. A one-to-one line is included. See color version of this figure at back of this issue.
Figure 3. Model mean estimated flux, prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for aggregated land and ocean regions. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions. Different scales are used for the land and ocean regions.
Figure 3. Model mean estimated flux, prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for aggregated land and ocean regions. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions. Different scales are used for the land and ocean regions.
Figure 4. Model mean estimated flux, total prior flux, neutral biosphere prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for selected land regions. Numerical estimate of annual mean flux and total uncertainty is provided in each figure. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.
Figure 4. Model mean estimated flux, total prior flux, neutral biosphere prior flux, prior uncertainties, and posterior uncertainties for selected land regions. Numerical estimate of annual mean flux and total uncertainty is provided in each figure. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.
Figure 6a. Model mean control flux, and estimated fluxes with prior uncertainties scaled by factors of 2, 5, and 10 for selected land and ocean regions. Also shown are the results for a case in which the background biosphere exchange is reduced to 50% of that used in the control run. The total uncertainty (between and within uncertainty) for the control case is provided. Note that the vertical scale varies.
Figure 6a. Model mean control flux, and estimated fluxes with prior uncertainties scaled by factors of 2, 5, and 10 for selected land and ocean regions. Also shown are the results for a case in which the background biosphere exchange is reduced to 50% of that used in the control run. The total uncertainty (between and within uncertainty) for the control case is provided. Note that the vertical scale varies.
Figure 6b. Estimated fluxes for the control case, the case in which prior uncertainties for the North Pacific, Northern Ocean, and North Atlantic are reduced by a factor of 4, and the difference. The fluxes represent the sum of the Boreal North America, Temperate North America, Boreal Asia, Temperate Asia, and Europe regions.
Figure 6b. Estimated fluxes for the control case, the case in which prior uncertainties for the North Pacific, Northern Ocean, and North Atlantic are reduced by a factor of 4, and the difference. The fluxes represent the sum of the Boreal North America, Temperate North America, Boreal Asia, Temperate Asia, and Europe regions.
Figure 8a. Station sensitivity for selected land regions. Estimated flux for the control inversion (75 stations), an inversion with 68 stations (removed CRI, GMI, IZO, UTA, Carr 5000m, PRS, and HUN), the control inversion with halved uncertainty on six southern stations (Bass Strait, SPO, HBA, SYO, MAA, and PSA), and an inversion with the combination of these two station adjustments. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.
Figure 8a. Station sensitivity for selected land regions. Estimated flux for the control inversion (75 stations), an inversion with 68 stations (removed CRI, GMI, IZO, UTA, Carr 5000m, PRS, and HUN), the control inversion with halved uncertainty on six southern stations (Bass Strait, SPO, HBA, SYO, MAA, and PSA), and an inversion with the combination of these two station adjustments. Note that the vertical scale varies. The fluxes do not include fossil fuel emissions.
Figure 8b. As in Figure 8a but for selected ocean regions.
Figure 8b. As in Figure 8a but for selected ocean regions.
Table 1. Annual Model Mean Flux Estimates, Uncertainties, and Results From Previously Published Annual Mean Inversion Study “This reflects an annual mean inversion without the Darwin observing station.
Table 1. Annual Model Mean Flux Estimates, Uncertainties, and Results From Previously Published Annual Mean Inversion Study “This reflects an annual mean inversion without the Darwin observing station.
Figure 2. Simulated background seasonal amplitude versus the observed amplitude at stations north of 35°N. Amplitude is defined as the mean October—March concentration minus the mean June—August concentration. The station average simulated values are provided in the legend. The observed station average is 5.6 ppm. A one-to-one line is included.
Figure 2. Simulated background seasonal amplitude versus the observed amplitude at stations north of 35°N. Amplitude is defined as the mean October—March concentration minus the mean June—August concentration. The station average simulated values are provided in the legend. The observed station average is 5.6 ppm. A one-to-one line is included.
Related topics:
Environmental ScienceGeologyGeochemistryClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesCarbon emissionCarbon TransportGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesCarbon SinkAtmospheric Transport
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved