Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 31 – uploaded by Goodhead Abraham

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 45: Execution results file (ExecutionResults_MinMin_4_10000.txt) algorithm which favours smaller jobs was used in scheduling. See Table 45. 7.5 Comparison between GridSim and the GPMS simulator

Table 45 Execution results file (ExecutionResults_MinMin_4_10000.txt) algorithm which favours smaller jobs was used in scheduling. See Table 45. 7.5 Comparison between GridSim and the GPMS simulator

Related Figures (99)

Table 1 Benefits of parallel computing
Table 1 Benefits of parallel computing
Table 2 Scheduling Experiments
Table 2 Scheduling Experiments
Table 5 Functions of the GPMS components 4.2.3 Context Diagram
Table 5 Functions of the GPMS components 4.2.3 Context Diagram
tes. The JobReceiver receives processed jobs from the Grid sites and returns them to users.
tes. The JobReceiver receives processed jobs from the Grid sites and returns them to users.
Figure 4a and 4b: Two level Context diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 4a and 4b: Two level Context diagram for the GPMS system
GPMS systems and some high-level view of the functionality of the system. Figure 5: Use Case diagram for the GPMS system 4.2.5 Activity Diagram
GPMS systems and some high-level view of the functionality of the system. Figure 5: Use Case diagram for the GPMS system 4.2.5 Activity Diagram
between users’ and the system. Figure 7: Sequence diagram for the GPMS system
between users’ and the system. Figure 7: Sequence diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 8a: Class diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 8a: Class diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 9b: Class diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 9b: Class diagram for the GPMS system
Figure 10: A model of the GPMS with multiple groups
Figure 10: A model of the GPMS with multiple groups
Figure 11: A model of the GPMS with four groups
Figure 11: A model of the GPMS with four groups
Figure 12: Flowchart for priority sorting of jobs
Figure 12: Flowchart for priority sorting of jobs
4.6.2. Grid Machines
4.6.2. Grid Machines
Table 14 Features and attributes of a Grid machine 6.3 Simulation of Grid, CPU Speed and Number of Cores
Table 14 Features and attributes of a Grid machine 6.3 Simulation of Grid, CPU Speed and Number of Cores
Table 15 Characteristics and components of the simulated Grid
Table 15 Characteristics and components of the simulated Grid
Figure 13: Schematic diagram of the system
Figure 13: Schematic diagram of the system
Table 17 Example rows of values (relevant attributes only) from the GWF trace file 4.6.6.1 Simulation of Priority
Table 17 Example rows of values (relevant attributes only) from the GWF trace file 4.6.6.1 Simulation of Priority
Figure 16: Speedup in percentage by Priority over MinMin
Figure 16: Speedup in percentage by Priority over MinMin
Figure 17: Total scheduling time of Priority and MinMin with increasing number of jobs
Figure 17: Total scheduling time of Priority and MinMin with increasing number of jobs
Figure 18: Total and average scheduling time of Priority and MinMin
Figure 18: Total and average scheduling time of Priority and MinMin
Table 23 Result and speedup for MinMin and ETB-EvenDist SimTog is shown in Table 26 and Table 27 and Figures 28 and 29 respectively.
Table 23 Result and speedup for MinMin and ETB-EvenDist SimTog is shown in Table 26 and Table 27 and Figures 28 and 29 respectively.
Table 24 Results and speedup for MinMin and ETB-SimTog
Table 24 Results and speedup for MinMin and ETB-SimTog
Figure 21: Total and Average of scheduling time for ETB-SimTog and MinMin
Figure 21: Total and Average of scheduling time for ETB-SimTog and MinMin
Figure 22: Speedup (in multiples) of the ETB-EvenDist over MinMin
Figure 22: Speedup (in multiples) of the ETB-EvenDist over MinMin
Figure 23: Speedup (in multiples) of the ETB-SimTog over MinMin
Figure 23: Speedup (in multiples) of the ETB-SimTog over MinMin
Figure 24: Speedup (in percentage) of the ETB-EvenDist over the MinMin
Figure 24: Speedup (in percentage) of the ETB-EvenDist over the MinMin
Figure 25: Speedup (in percentage) of the ETB-SimTog over the MinMin
Figure 25: Speedup (in percentage) of the ETB-SimTog over the MinMin
Figure 27: ETB-EvenDist: Improvement on MinMin and across groups
Figure 27: ETB-EvenDist: Improvement on MinMin and across groups
Figure 28: ETB-SimTog: Improvement on MinMin and across Groups
Figure 28: ETB-SimTog: Improvement on MinMin and across Groups
Table 29 Scheduling times and speedup for MinMin vs. ETSB-EvenDist
Table 29 Scheduling times and speedup for MinMin vs. ETSB-EvenDist
Figure 33: Speedup (in multiples) by ETSB-SimTog against MinMin
Figure 33: Speedup (in multiples) by ETSB-SimTog against MinMin
Figure 34: Speedup (in multiples) by ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin
Figure 34: Speedup (in multiples) by ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin
Figure 35: Speedup (in percentage) by ETSB-SimTog against MinMin
Figure 35: Speedup (in percentage) by ETSB-SimTog against MinMin
Figure 36: Speedup (in percentage) by ETSB-EvenDist against MinMin
Figure 36: Speedup (in percentage) by ETSB-EvenDist against MinMin
Figure 37: Improvement of ETSB-SimTog over MinMin across groups
Figure 37: Improvement of ETSB-SimTog over MinMin across groups
Figure 38: Improvement of ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin across groups
Figure 38: Improvement of ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin across groups
Figure 39: Improvement of ETSB-SimTog over MinMin and between group:
Figure 39: Improvement of ETSB-SimTog over MinMin and between group:
Figure 40: Performance improvement of ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin and groups
Figure 40: Performance improvement of ETSB-EvenDist over MinMin and groups
Figure 41: Rate of Improvement of ETSB-SimTog across group cardinality
Figure 41: Rate of Improvement of ETSB-SimTog across group cardinality
Figure 42: Rate of Improvement of ETSB-EvenDist across group cardinality
Figure 42: Rate of Improvement of ETSB-EvenDist across group cardinality
Table 34 Result and Improvement for ETB and ETSE Table 35 ANOVA Test: Priority vs. ETB and ETSB methods
Table 34 Result and Improvement for ETB and ETSE Table 35 ANOVA Test: Priority vs. ETB and ETSB methods
Table 36 ANOVA Test: MinMin, ETB and ETSB methods Table 37 Speedup for ETB and ETSB methods using two group
Table 36 ANOVA Test: MinMin, ETB and ETSB methods Table 37 Speedup for ETB and ETSB methods using two group
Table 41 Standard Deviation, Correlation and t-tests for Priority, ETB and ETSB
Table 41 Standard Deviation, Correlation and t-tests for Priority, ETB and ETSB
Figure 43: Scheduling performance by all methods with increasing jobs
Figure 43: Scheduling performance by all methods with increasing jobs
Figure 44: Scheduling performance by GPMS methods with increasing jobs
Figure 44: Scheduling performance by GPMS methods with increasing jobs
Figure 45: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using two groups
Figure 45: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using two groups
Figure 47: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using four groups
Figure 47: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using four groups
Figure 48: Improvement across methods using four groups
Figure 48: Improvement across methods using four groups
Figure 49: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using eight groups
Figure 49: Speedup by ETB and ETSB methods using eight groups
Figure 52: Improvement by ETB and ETSB methods across Groups
Figure 52: Improvement by ETB and ETSB methods across Groups
Figure 53: Improvement comparison between the GPMS methods (multiples)
Figure 53: Improvement comparison between the GPMS methods (multiples)
Figure 55: Percentage and mean scheduling time of the GPMS methods
Figure 55: Percentage and mean scheduling time of the GPMS methods
Figure 57: Aggregate rate of improvement with increasing group
Figure 57: Aggregate rate of improvement with increasing group
sample result statistics header file with some data is shown in the Table 44.
sample result statistics header file with some data is shown in the Table 44.
Related topics:
Computer ScienceDistributed Computing
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved