Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 7 – uploaded by ehsan hoseini

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 4. The phylogram (A) and cladogram (B) of the 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Branch support values are Bayesian posterior probabilities.

Figure 4 The phylogram (A) and cladogram (B) of the 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Branch support values are Bayesian posterior probabilities.

Related Figures (12)

Table 1. Specimens studied in the anatomical survey along with their related data _Table 2. Specimens studied in the phylogenetic analyses along with their related data
Table 1. Specimens studied in the anatomical survey along with their related data _Table 2. Specimens studied in the phylogenetic analyses along with their related data
Table 3. Anatomical traits of epidermis in the studied species of Salix, Populus, and Bivinia
Table 3. Anatomical traits of epidermis in the studied species of Salix, Populus, and Bivinia
Fig. 1 (A-T). Cross section of petioleyunder optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, I. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra, P. S. humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya, S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.). ab: abaxial surface, ad: adaxial surface, a: epidermis, b: collenchyma, c: parenchyma, d: sclerenchyma, e: xylem, f: phloem (Bars = 300 um).
Fig. 1 (A-T). Cross section of petioleyunder optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, I. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra, P. S. humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya, S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.). ab: abaxial surface, ad: adaxial surface, a: epidermis, b: collenchyma, c: parenchyma, d: sclerenchyma, e: xylem, f: phloem (Bars = 300 um).
Fig. 1 (U-Z). Cross section of petiole under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: U. Salix silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana, X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii (Bars = 300 um).
Fig. 1 (U-Z). Cross section of petiole under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: U. Salix silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana, X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii (Bars = 300 um).
Fig. 2 (A-O). Petiole epidermis under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, I. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra. tr: trichome, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 2 (A-O). Petiole epidermis under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, I. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra. tr: trichome, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 2 (P-Z). Petiole epidermis under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: P. Salix humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya,S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.), U. S. silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana, X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 2 (P-Z). Petiole epidermis under optical microscope with a magnification of 10x: P. Salix humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya,S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.), U. S. silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana, X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 3 (A-O). Petiole epidermis hand-drawings: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, 1. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 3 (A-O). Petiole epidermis hand-drawings: A. Salix aegyptica, B. S. alba, C. S. amygdaliodes, D. S. appendiculata, E. S. atrocinerea, F. S. babylonica, G. S. calliantha, H. S. calodendron, 1. S. caprea, J. S. cordifolia, K. S. discolor, L. S. eleagnos, M. S. excelsa, N. S. foetida, O. S. glabra. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 3 (P-Z). Petiole epidermis“*paintings: P. Salix humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya, S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.), U. S. silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana. X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 3 (P-Z). Petiole epidermis“*paintings: P. Salix humboldtiana, Q. S. x persica, R. S. pycnostachya, S. S. reticulata, T. S. silecisa (Tatry Mts.), U. S. silecisa (Vrchy Mts.), V. S. viminalis, W. S. waldsteniana. X. S. xanthicola, Y. Populus alba, Z. P. nigra, Z. Bivinia jalbertii. tr: trichom, ep: epidermis (Bars = 30 um).
Fig. 5. Ancestral state reconstruction and character state trace of (A) Epidermal cells shape, (B) Anticlinal wall pattern (C) Petiole compression, (D) Indumentum of epidermis and (E) Trichome distribution, on the phylogenetic tree inferre form the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Equivocal state indicates nodes with major character state shifts.
Fig. 5. Ancestral state reconstruction and character state trace of (A) Epidermal cells shape, (B) Anticlinal wall pattern (C) Petiole compression, (D) Indumentum of epidermis and (E) Trichome distribution, on the phylogenetic tree inferre form the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Equivocal state indicates nodes with major character state shifts.
Fig. 5 (contd). Ancestral state reconstruction and character state trace of (F) Presence of lateral ribs, (G) Adaxial surface curvature, (H) Petiole outline, (I) Sub-generic status and (J) Species distribution, on the phylogenetic tree inferred form the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Equivocal state indicates nodes with major character state shifts.
Fig. 5 (contd). Ancestral state reconstruction and character state trace of (F) Presence of lateral ribs, (G) Adaxial surface curvature, (H) Petiole outline, (I) Sub-generic status and (J) Species distribution, on the phylogenetic tree inferred form the Bayesian analysis of ITS dataset. Equivocal state indicates nodes with major character state shifts.
Related topics:
Biology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved