Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 4 – uploaded by Aniruddha Pandit

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 3. a: Numerical solutions of the cumulative volume density distribution for linear grid with various discretisation resolutions. b: Numerical solutions of the cumulative volume density distribution for logarithmic grid with various discretisation resolutions.

Figure 3 a: Numerical solutions of the cumulative volume density distribution for linear grid with various discretisation resolutions. b: Numerical solutions of the cumulative volume density distribution for logarithmic grid with various discretisation resolutions.

Related Figures (13)

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of experimental setup for ferrous sulphate heptahydrate crystallisation.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of experimental setup for ferrous sulphate heptahydrate crystallisation.
Figure 2. Experimentally determined solubility curve for ferrous sulphate.
Figure 2. Experimentally determined solubility curve for ferrous sulphate.
Figure 4. a: Numerical solutions of population density distribution for linear grid with various discretisation resolutions. b: Numerical solutions of population density distribution for logarithmic grid with various discretisation resolutions.
Figure 4. a: Numerical solutions of population density distribution for linear grid with various discretisation resolutions. b: Numerical solutions of population density distribution for logarithmic grid with various discretisation resolutions.
Table 2. Operating conditions for various runs for batch cooling crystallisation of potassium sulphate (Parisi and Chianese, 2003) and FSH
Table 2. Operating conditions for various runs for batch cooling crystallisation of potassium sulphate (Parisi and Chianese, 2003) and FSH
Table 1. Comparison of optimal estimate by gPROMS simulation with literature for kinetic parameters for test case
Table 1. Comparison of optimal estimate by gPROMS simulation with literature for kinetic parameters for test case
Table 3. Optimal estimate by gPROMS simulation for kinetic parameters for FSH crystallisation
Table 3. Optimal estimate by gPROMS simulation for kinetic parameters for FSH crystallisation
Figure 6. Mass fraction distribution profiles for case study. Figure 5. Supersaturation profiles for different runs of case study.
Figure 6. Mass fraction distribution profiles for case study. Figure 5. Supersaturation profiles for different runs of case study.
Figure 10. Snapshot of MSExcel Linking with gPROMS using FOFP
Figure 10. Snapshot of MSExcel Linking with gPROMS using FOFP
Figure 7. Supersaturation profiles for run | and II in FSH crystallisation.
Figure 7. Supersaturation profiles for run | and II in FSH crystallisation.
Figure 9. Population density distribution for run II in FSH crystallisation.
Figure 9. Population density distribution for run II in FSH crystallisation.
Figure 8. Population density distribution for run | in FSH crystallisation.
Figure 8. Population density distribution for run | in FSH crystallisation.
Related topics:
Chemical Engineering
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved