Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 7. Comparison of results from D/I methodology (top figures, black lines indicate the uncertainty margins caused by uncertainty in decoupling), PSCAD simulation (middle figures) and RC-divider results (bottom figures): (a) Energization from substation connected by 4.4 km overhead line to the transition point; (b) Energization from substation connected via 6.8 km overhead line. For both switching events the high frequency oscillations are overrepresented in the divider measurement as compared to both D/I measurement and simulation.  Figure 7 shows the result from simultaneous measurement with the D/I method (top figures) and an RC divider (bottom figures). In between, the PSCAD simulations are presented. The measurements are taken at both transition points with the parallel circuit in service. It is observed that oscillations occur in the divider response, which are far more severe than found in both the simulation and the D/I response. It should be noted that, although simulation and D/I response are quite similar, also here the measured oscillation immediately after energizing is somewhat stronger than simulated.

Figure 7 Comparison of results from D/I methodology (top figures, black lines indicate the uncertainty margins caused by uncertainty in decoupling), PSCAD simulation (middle figures) and RC-divider results (bottom figures): (a) Energization from substation connected by 4.4 km overhead line to the transition point; (b) Energization from substation connected via 6.8 km overhead line. For both switching events the high frequency oscillations are overrepresented in the divider measurement as compared to both D/I measurement and simulation. Figure 7 shows the result from simultaneous measurement with the D/I method (top figures) and an RC divider (bottom figures). In between, the PSCAD simulations are presented. The measurements are taken at both transition points with the parallel circuit in service. It is observed that oscillations occur in the divider response, which are far more severe than found in both the simulation and the D/I response. It should be noted that, although simulation and D/I response are quite similar, also here the measured oscillation immediately after energizing is somewhat stronger than simulated.