Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Eko Iswanto

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 1. Preference of nymphs to settle on rice varieties. The bars followed by the same letter each time are not significantly different (DMRT3 = 0.05). 2, 6, and significan significant 33, RH and 2 yd The settling of nymphs on rice varieties was not significantly d There were different results for the adult (Figure 2). The number o ifferent in every observation (Figure 1). f adults observed in each rice varieties at hours after infestation (HAI) were not ifferent (P> 0.05). After 24 hours, adults y settled on TN1 compared to Inpari 13, Inpari PTB33 (F= 5.52; P< 0.001). Since 48 to 72 HAI, number of adults in resistant varieties significantly less than 7 TN (F= 11.57; P< 0.001). Among modern rice varieties, the lowest number of adults was found in Inpari 13 t nan Inpari 31 and Inpari 33. The result of settling test showed that nymphs were spread equally in each variety. At 2, 6, and 12

Figure 1 Preference of nymphs to settle on rice varieties. The bars followed by the same letter each time are not significantly different (DMRT3 = 0.05). 2, 6, and significan significant 33, RH and 2 yd The settling of nymphs on rice varieties was not significantly d There were different results for the adult (Figure 2). The number o ifferent in every observation (Figure 1). f adults observed in each rice varieties at hours after infestation (HAI) were not ifferent (P> 0.05). After 24 hours, adults y settled on TN1 compared to Inpari 13, Inpari PTB33 (F= 5.52; P< 0.001). Since 48 to 72 HAI, number of adults in resistant varieties significantly less than 7 TN (F= 11.57; P< 0.001). Among modern rice varieties, the lowest number of adults was found in Inpari 13 t nan Inpari 31 and Inpari 33. The result of settling test showed that nymphs were spread equally in each variety. At 2, 6, and 12

Related Figures (3)

Figure 1. Preference of gravid females to settle on rice varieties. The bars followed by the same letter each time are not significantly different (DMRT;a= 0.05).
Figure 1. Preference of gravid females to settle on rice varieties. The bars followed by the same letter each time are not significantly different (DMRT;a= 0.05).
Figure 3. The number of eggs by five gravid females on each variety. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (DMRT;a=0.05). HAL, the nymphs which were settled on tested varieties were in the range of 44—50.6%, and others nymphs were stayed on the soil and plastic mylar. At 24 hours after infestation, the settled nymphs on the tested varieties increased up to 76.5-88.1%. It was suggested that the nymphs were sensitive to antixenosis released by the resistant varieties. Different result showed on the adults, all of them were settled on the tested varieties since the first observation. It means that the adults needed less time than nymphs to select or find the acceptance and suitability host. stayed on the soil and plastic mylar. At 24 hours after
Figure 3. The number of eggs by five gravid females on each variety. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (DMRT;a=0.05). HAL, the nymphs which were settled on tested varieties were in the range of 44—50.6%, and others nymphs were stayed on the soil and plastic mylar. At 24 hours after infestation, the settled nymphs on the tested varieties increased up to 76.5-88.1%. It was suggested that the nymphs were sensitive to antixenosis released by the resistant varieties. Different result showed on the adults, all of them were settled on the tested varieties since the first observation. It means that the adults needed less time than nymphs to select or find the acceptance and suitability host. stayed on the soil and plastic mylar. At 24 hours after
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved